TY  - EJOU
AU  - Olivero, Alberto 
AU  - Giudici, Sofia 
AU  - Caviglia, Alberto 
AU  - Palagonia, Erika 
AU  - Nizzardo, Marco 
AU  - Quistini, Alberto 
AU  - Grasso, Andrea 
AU  - Maltzman, Ofir 
AU  - Colombo, Marco 
AU  - Tappero, Stefano 
AU  - Mazzone, Elio 
AU  - Dell’Oglio, Paolo 
AU  - Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo 
AU  - Galfano, Antonio 
AU  - Secco, Silvia 

TI  - HypnoVR<sup>®</sup> in minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): a safe, sedation-reducing tool improving patient experience
T2  - Canadian Journal of Urology

PY  - 
VL  - 
IS  - 
SN  - 1488-5581

AB  -  <b>Background:</b> Minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) are becoming an increasingly popular outpatient treatment option for lower urinary tract symptoms. Although generally well-tolerated, MISTs may cause periprocedural discomfort. Virtual reality devices (VRDs) have been shown to reduce patient-reported pain during several procedures. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of VRD during MISTs could improve perioperative endovenous sedation needs of a VRD during MISTs in a case-control design. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed patient data from MISTs performed between January 2024 and July 2025 at a single referral center (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy). Procedures were conducted with or without a VRD (HypnoVR<sup>®</sup>, Strasbourg, France), based on patient preference and device availability. Patients were grouped into MISTs without VRD (group 1) and MISTs with VRD (group 2). Periprocedural data, endovenous sedation needs, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain, use of additional painkiller drugs after the procedure, and complication rate have been addressed. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one procedures with VRD and 66 control procedures were analyzed. Groups were comparable in age, prostate volume, PSA, indwelling catheter presence, and type of MIST. Median (IQR) prostate volume was 41 (30–56) mL in group 1 and 36 (30–45) mL in group 2. MIST distribution was similar, though iTIND procedures were more frequent with VRD. Endovenous sedation rate was higher in group 1 (86.4 vs. 38.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Median (IQR) VAS scores were 2 (1–2) in group 1 and 1.5 (1–2.75) in group 2. No VRD-related side effects or procedure interruptions occurred. <b>Conclusion:</b> This is the first study demonstrating the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of VRD use during MISTs. Although VRD did not significantly reduce pain scores, it markedly decreased endovenous sedation use, potentially facilitating faster recovery and discharge. VRD may be considered for patients undergoing MISTs where available.
KW  - Pain control; minimally invasive surgical techniques; outpatient surgery; virtual reality; lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)

DO  - 10.32604/cju.2026.076804