@Article{,
AUTHOR = {Stanton M. Regan, Stephen D. W. Beck, Richard Bihrle, Richard S. Foster},
TITLE = {Role of routine stentograms following urinary diversion in modern practice},
JOURNAL = {Canadian Journal of Urology},
VOLUME = {16},
YEAR = {2009},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {4660--4663},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/CJU/v16n3/62175},
ISSN = {1488-5581},
ABSTRACT = {<b>Objective:</b> To examine the usefulness of routine stentograms in patient management following urinary diversion.<br/>
<b>Materials and methods:</b> A retrospective review of all patients undergoing urinary diversion from February 2004 to February 2007 was performed. Three hundred twenty-six patients were identified. One hundred fifty patients were excluded: 101 patients had no stentogram and 49 patients had incomplete records or follow up.<br/>
<b>Results:</b> Of the 176 patients, ureteral anastomotic leak was detected in three of 344 ureters (0.9%). The ureteral stents were left in situ until the leaks resolved. None of the three developed a ureteral stricture. Ten (3.0%) ureters had delayed drainage and the stents were removed as scheduled. One patient developed hydronephrosis from a retained portion of the ureteral stent. The 328 ureters (95.4%) with normal stentograms were followed for 30 weeks (3-144). Four ureters (1.25%) developed distal ureteral strictures and one patient developed a ureteral tumor recurrence. No patient developed a post-stentogram complication.<br/>
<b>Conclusions:</b> The incidence of a ureteral enteric anastomotic leak detected by stentogram is less than 1%-2%. Routine stentograms do not appear necessary in stable patients without clinical signs of a urine leak and thus are now only seldom performed at our institution.},
DOI = {}
}