TY - EJOU
AU - Garfield, Susan S.
AU - Gavaghan, Meghan B.
AU - Armstrong, Shannon O.
AU - Jones, J. Stephen
TI - The cost-effectiveness of blue light cystoscopy in bladder cancer detection: United States projections based on clinical data showing 4.5 years of follow up after a single hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride instillation
T2 - Canadian Journal of Urology
PY - 2013
VL - 20
IS - 2
SN - 1488-5581
AB - Introduction: Several studies, including the recently published phase III study by Stenzl and colleagues, have demonstrated that hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride, when used with blue light fluorescence cystoscopy, improves detection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors compared to white light cystoscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURB) alone.
Materials and methods: The objective of this study was to conduct a detailed assessment of the cost-effectiveness of using hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride with blue light cystoscopy as an adjunct to white light versus white light cystoscopy alone at the time of initial TURB in the United States. A probabilistic decision tree model, using TreeAge Pro 2011 software, was developed using base case scenario cost and utility estimates.
Results: Incorporation of hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride into diagnostic cystoscopy results in lower costs over 5 years ($25,921) as compared to those patients who initially receive white light cystoscopy ($30,581). Those patients who initially receive hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride blue light TURB also experience a lower overall cancer burden.
Conclusions: Hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride may be cost-effective when used at first TURB for patients with suspected new or recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
KW - white light cystoscopy
KW - bladder cancer
KW - bladder cancer detection
KW - Cysview
KW - cystoscopy
KW - cost-effectiveness
KW - outcomes
KW - utility
KW - cystectomy
KW - transurethral resection of the bladder
DO -