TY - EJOU AU - Garfield, Susan S. AU - Gavaghan, Meghan B. AU - Armstrong, Shannon O. AU - Jones, J. Stephen TI - The cost-effectiveness of blue light cystoscopy in bladder cancer detection: United States projections based on clinical data showing 4.5 years of follow up after a single hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride instillation T2 - Canadian Journal of Urology PY - 2013 VL - 20 IS - 2 SN - 1488-5581 AB - Introduction: Several studies, including the recently published phase III study by Stenzl and colleagues, have demonstrated that hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride, when used with blue light fluorescence cystoscopy, improves detection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors compared to white light cystoscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURB) alone.
Materials and methods: The objective of this study was to conduct a detailed assessment of the cost-effectiveness of using hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride with blue light cystoscopy as an adjunct to white light versus white light cystoscopy alone at the time of initial TURB in the United States. A probabilistic decision tree model, using TreeAge Pro 2011 software, was developed using base case scenario cost and utility estimates.
Results: Incorporation of hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride into diagnostic cystoscopy results in lower costs over 5 years ($25,921) as compared to those patients who initially receive white light cystoscopy ($30,581). Those patients who initially receive hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride blue light TURB also experience a lower overall cancer burden.
Conclusions: Hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride may be cost-effective when used at first TURB for patients with suspected new or recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. KW - white light cystoscopy KW - bladder cancer KW - bladder cancer detection KW - Cysview KW - cystoscopy KW - cost-effectiveness KW - outcomes KW - utility KW - cystectomy KW - transurethral resection of the bladder DO -