@Article{,
AUTHOR = {Nikolai Aljuri, Peter Gilling, Claus Roehrborn},
TITLE = {How I do it: Balloon tamponade of prostatic fossa following Aquablation},
JOURNAL = {Canadian Journal of Urology},
VOLUME = {24},
YEAR = {2017},
NUMBER = {4},
PAGES = {8937--8940},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/CJU/v24n4/60942},
ISSN = {1488-5581},
ABSTRACT = {Since its first report in the 1870s, control of bleeding after 
transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has remained 
a concern. Foley’s initial report of a urinary catheter involved 
placement of the balloon into the prostatic fossa following 
TURP. Removal of prostate tissue with a high-velocity saline stream (Aquablation) is a recently reported alternative 
to TURP. As Aquablation is heat-free, alternatives to non-thermal hemostasis were sought to optimize the procedure. 
We report use of a balloon catheter in the prostatic fossa after 
Aquablation as a post-resection hemostatic method.},
DOI = {}
}