TY - EJOU
AU - Sullivan, John F.
AU - Stassen, Paul N.
AU - Moran, Diarmuid
AU - Bolton, Eva M.
AU - Smyth, Lisa G.
AU - Browne, Cliodhna M.
AU - Forde, James C.
AU - Tal, Raanan
AU - Lynch, Thomas H.
TI - The transobturator suburethral sling: a safe and effective option for all degrees of post prostatectomy urinary incontinence
T2 - Canadian Journal of Urology
PY - 2018
VL - 25
IS - 2
SN - 1488-5581
AB - Introduction: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common complication. While the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has traditionally been considered the surgical standard of care, the transobturator male sling has emerged as a viable alternative with distinct advantages, including lower complication rates and a less complex surgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of a consecutive series of suburethral sling insertions using the AdVance sling in men with all degrees of post-RP SUI.
Materials and methods: A prospective cohort of men who underwent AdVance sling placement for post-RP SUI was analyzed. Pre- and postoperative urinary function, 24-hour pad usage, quality of life (QoL), complications, and need for further interventions were assessed. Incontinence severity was categorized based on daily pad use: mild (1–2 pads/day), moderate (3–5 pads/day), or severe (≥6 pads/day). Patients were followed up at 1, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. Symptom severity and QoL were evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (ICIQ-SF).
Results: A total of 77 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 68 years and a mean time from RP to sling placement of 34 months (range: 8–113 months). Preoperatively, 22% had mild, 58% had moderate, and 20% had severe incontinence. Fourteen percent had undergone post-RP radiation therapy. Overall, 73% of patients experienced complete resolution of symptoms after sling placement, 12% showed significant improvement, and 15% had no reduction in pad use. Among those with severe incontinence, 60% were classified as cured (defined as zero pads or one dry pad for security purposes). When patients who had received post-RP radiation therapy were excluded, the cure rate increased to 82%. At a mean follow-up of 30 months, ICIQ-SF scores improved significantly from a baseline mean of 17.7 (9–21.0) to 8.0 (0–20) (p < 0.0001; 95% CI: 8–12).
Conclusion: Suburethral slings, particularly the AdVance sling, are effective and safe for treating all degrees of post-radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. They are associated with significant improvements in quality of life and can be a viable option even for patients with more severe forms of SUI when appropriately selected and counseled.
KW - suburethral slings
KW - male stress urinary incontinence
KW - radical prostatectomy
DO -