Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences |

DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2022.018615

ARTICLE

Neutrosophic ϰ-Structures in Ordered Semigroups

1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia

2Department of Mathematics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, 641114, India

3Department of Mathematics and Statistic, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: G. Muhiuddin. Email: chishtygm@gmail.com

Received: 06 August 2021; Accepted: 03 November 2021

Abstract: In general, ordered algebraic structures, particularly ordered semigroups, play an important role in fuzzification in many applied areas, such as computer science, formal languages, coding theory, error correction, etc. Nowadays, the concept of ambiguity is important in dealing with a variety of issues related to engineering modeling problems, network theory, decision-making problems in real-life situations, and so on. Several theories have been developed by various researchers to overcome the difficulties that arise from uncertainty, including fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, probability, soft sets, neutrosophic sets, and many more. In this paper, we focus solely on neutrosophic set theory. In ordered semigroups, we define and investigate the properties of neutrosophic ϰ-ideals and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals. We also use neutrosophic ϰ-ideals and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals to characterize ordered semigroups.

Keywords: Ordered semigroup; ideals; neutrosophic ϰ-structures; neutrosophic ϰ-ideals; neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals

In [1], Zadeh proposed the theory of fuzzy sets to model vague notions in the universe. In [2], Atanassov generalized the fuzzy set theory concepts and renamed as Intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. According to his view, there are the two kinds of degrees of freedom in a globe such as membership to a vague subset and non-membership to that given subset. In [3], Rosenfeld introduced the concepts of fuzziness in groups and obtained several results. Recently, many researchers pursue their research in this area and these concepts have been applied to different algebraic structures such as semigroups, ordered semigroups, rings (see [4 –10]).

Smarandache proposed the notions of neutrosophic sets to handle uncertainty that arises everywhere. It is the generalization of fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Using these three attributes such as a truth (T), an indeterminacy (I) and a falsity (F) membership functions, neutrosophic sets are characterized. These sets have numerous applications in various disciplines to deal with the complexities that arise primarily from ambiguity data. A neutrosophic set can differentiate between relative and absolute membership functions. Smarandache used these sets in non-standard analysis, namely decision making theory, control theory, decision of sports (winning/defeating/tie), etc.

In [11], Muhiuddin et al. presented the notion of implicative neutrosophic quadruple-algebras, and various properties were investigated. In [12], Muhiuddin et al. found the relationship between (ɛ, ɛ)-neutrosophic ideal and (ɛ, ɛ)-neutrosophic subalgebra in a BCK-algebra. Also, they provided conditions under which an (ɛ, ɛ)-neutrosophic subalgebraic structure to be an (ɛ, ɛ)-neutrosophic ideal structure. In [13], Muhiuddin et al. introduced the theory of neutrosophic implicative ϰ-ideal in BCK-algebras, and examined its properties. In addition, the relationship between different kinds of neutrosophic implicative ϰ-ideals were discussed.

In [14], Khan et al. defined and discussed various properties of neutrosophic ϰ-subsemigroup and ɛ-neutrosophic ϰ-subsemigroup in a semigroup. As a motivation from [14], we delve into different types of notions of neutrosophic ϰ-structures, namely neutrosophic ϰ-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals and investigated various properties. In [15], Elavarasan et al. proposed the notions of neutrosophic ϰ-ideals and characteristic neutrosophic ϰ-structure in semigroup and discussed its properties. Further, the equivalent assertions for characteristic neutrosophic ϰ-structure were provided. In [16], Porselvi et al. defined and obtained various properties of neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideal structure in a semigroup. We have shown that both neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals and neutrosophic ϰ-right ideals were the same if the semigroup is regular left duo. Moreover, we have obtained equivalent conditions for regular semigroup in terms of neutrosophic ϰ-product. In [17], Porselvi et al. defined and discussed the notions of neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideal structures and neutrosophic ϰ-simple in semigroup. Also, we explored equivalent assertions for a simple semigroup, and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideal structures. For more concepts related to this work, we refer the readers to [18 –23].

The aim of this paper is to define the concepts of neutrosophic ϰ-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals in ordered semigroup, and discuss its properties. We obtain an equivalent assertion of an interior ideal in ordered semigroup in terms of characteristic neutrosophic ϰ-structures. Further, we define the notion of ɛ-neutrosophic ϰ-ideals and ɛ-neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals in ordered semigroup, and explore its properties. Moreover we show that the preimage of neutrosophic ϰ-right (resp., left, ideal) ideal is neutrosophic ϰ-right (resp., left, ideal) ideal under a homomorphism of an ordered semigroup.

An non-empty set

(i)

(ii)

(iii) For

For any

Definition 2.1. [24] Let

Definition 2.2. [24] Let

(i)

(ii) For k1∈ K and

K is an ideal of

Definition 2.3. [24] Let

(i)

(ii) For all

Defintion 2.4. [5] Let

Defintion 2.5. [5] Let

Let

Definition 2.6. Let

where

Definition 2.7. Let

Let

The set

We refer to [14–17] for basic definitions of neutrosophic ϰ-structures in a semigroup, such as neutrosophic ϰ-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals, and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideal. We define the neutrosophic ϰ-structures in an ordered semigroup

Definition 2.8. Let

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

A neutrosophic ϰ-structure

Definition 2.9. Let

(i)

(ii)

It is evident that all the neutrosophic ϰ-ideals are neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals, but neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideal need not be a neutrosophic ϰ-ideal, as given by an example.

Example 2.1. Consider the ordered semigroup

and

Let

**Definition 2.10.** Let

(i)

(ii)

It is evident that neutrosophic ϰ-ideals are always neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals, but not vice versa, as given by an example.

Example 2.2. Let

Let

Definition 2.11. Let

where

Definition 2.12. Let

(i)

If

(ii) The union of two neutrosophic ϰ-structures

where

(iii) The intersection of two neutrosophic ϰ-structures

where

3 Neutrosophic ϰ-Structures in Ordered Semigroups

In this section, we study some properties of neutrosophic ϰ-ideals and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideal structure in an ordered semigroup

Theorem 3.1. [15] Let

(i) K is left ideal (resp., right ideal),

(ii)

Theorem 3.2. Let

(i) K is left ideal (resp., right ideal),

(ii)

Proof. (i)⇒(ii) Suppose K is left ideal and let

If k2∈ K, then

If k2∉ K, then

(ii)⇒(i) Assume

Theorem 3.3. [17] Suppose

(i) K is interior ideal,

(ii)

Theorem 3.4. Let

(i) K is interior ideal,

(ii)

Proof. (i)⇒(ii) Suppose K is interior ideal and let

If k2∈ K, then

If k2∉ K, then

(ii)⇒(i) Assume

Theorem 3.5. Let

Proof. The proof is a routine procedure.

Theorem 3.6. Let

Proof. Assume

Theorem 3.7. Let

Proof. Let

Therefore

Definition 3.1. An ordered semigroup

(i) left (resp., right) simple if it does not contain any proper left (resp., right) ideal of

(ii) simple if it does not contain any proper ideal of

Definition 3.2. An ordered semigroup

Notation 3.1. Let

Theorem 3.8. Let

Proof. Let

Theorem 3.9. If

Proof. Suppose

Conversely, let

Lemma 3.1. [25] An ordered semigroup

Theorem 3.10. For any ordered semigroup

Proof. Suppose

Conversely, suppose

Theorem 3.11. Let

Proof. Suppose

Theorem 3.12. ([17], Theorem 3.17) Let

Theorem 3.13. Let

Proof. Let

Let

Let

Hence by Theorem 3.12,

Let

Definition 3.3. Let

where ɛT, ɛI, ɛF∈ [ −1, 0] such that −3≤ ɛT +ɛI +ɛF≤ 0.

Definition 3.4. Let

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

where ɛT, ɛI, ɛF∈ [ −1, 0] such that −3≤ ɛT +ɛI +ɛF≤ 0.

Definition 3.5. Let

(i)

(ii)

where ɛT, ɛI, ɛF∈ [ −1, 0] such that −3≤ ɛT +ɛI +ɛF≤ 0.

Theorem 3.14. Let

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4.14 of [14].

Theorem 3.15. Let

Proof. For any

For any

Therefore

Theorem 3.16. Let

then the set

is an interior ideal of

Proof. Let

Now for any

So k1k2k3∈ Ω.

Let

Following [26], let

For a map

Theorem 3.17. Let

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4.16 of [14].

Theorem 3.18. Let

Proof. Let

Let k1≤ k2. Then

Therefore

Theorem 3.19. Let

Proof. For any

Let k1≤ k2. Then

Hence by Theorem 3.17,

Let

over

Theorem 3.20. Let

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4.17 of [14].

Theorem 3.21. Let

Proof. Let

Let

Therefore

Theorem 3.22. Let

Proof. Let

Let

Therefore, by Theorem 3.20,

Let

over

Theorem 3.23. Let

If

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4.18 of [14].

Theorem 3.24. Let

If

Proof. Let

Now,

Let k1, k2∈ M with k1≤ k2. Then

Therefore

Theorem 3.25. Let

If

Proof. Let

Now,

Let

Hence, by Theorem 3.23,

In ordered semigroups, the concepts of neutrosophic ϰ-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals, and neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals were introduced and their properties were investigated. We defined ordered semigroups by employing various neutrosophic ϰ-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals, neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals and so on. In our future work, we intend to define different types of notions in neutrosophic ϰ-structures over-ordered semigroups, such as neutrosophic ϰ-prime, neutrosophic ϰ-quasi-prime, and investigate the structural properties of ordered semigroups using the concepts and results in ordered semigroups. Hopefully, our research work will continue in this direction and will create a platform for other algebraic structures.

Funding Statement: The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for careful checking of the details and for helpful comments that improved this paper. This work was supported by the Taif University Researchers Supporting Project (TURSP-2020/246), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

1. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

2. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96. DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

3. Rosenfeld, A. (1971). Fuzzy groups. Journal of Mathematics Analysis and Applications, 35, 512–517. DOI 10.1016/0022-247X(71)90199-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

4. Kehayopulu, N. (1998). A note on strongly regular ordered semigroups. Scientiae Mathematicae, 1(1), 33–36. [Google Scholar]

5. Kehayopulu, N., Tsingelis, M. (2006). Fuzzy interior ideals in ordered semigroups. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 21, 65–71. [Google Scholar]

6. Kuroki, N. (1981). On fuzzy ideals and fuzzy biideals in semigroups. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5, 203–215. [Google Scholar]

7. Mohseni Takallo, M., Ali Borzooei, R., Song, S., Jun, Y. B. (2021). Implicative ideals of BCK-algebras based on MBJ-neutrosophic sets. AIMS Mathematics, 6(10), 11029–11045. DOI 10.3934/math.2021640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

8. Mukherjee, T. K., Sen, M. K. (1989). Prime fuzzy ideals in rings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 32, 337–341. DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90266-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

9. Jin, Q., Hu, K., Bo, C. X., Li, L. (2021). A new single-valued neutrosophic rough sets and related topology. Journal of Mathematics, 2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5522021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

10. Kehayopulu, N., Tsingelis, M. (1999). A note on fuzzy sets in semigroups. Scientiae Mathematicae, 2(3), 411–413. [Google Scholar]

11. Muhiuddin, G., Ahmad, N., Al-Kenani Roh, E. H., Jun, Y. B. (2019). Implicative neutrosophic quadruple BCK-algebras and ideals. Symmetry, 11(2), 277. [Google Scholar]

12. Muhiuddin, G., Bordbar, H., Smarandache, F., Jun, Y. B. (2018). Further results on (ɛ; ɛ)-neutrosophic subalgebras and ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 20, 36–43. [Google Scholar]

13. Muhiuddin, G., Kim, S. J., Jun, Y. B. (2019). Implicative ϰ-ideals of BCK-algebras based on neutrosophic ϰ structures. Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 11(1), 1950011. [Google Scholar]

14. Khan, M., Anis, S., Smarandache, F., Jun, Y. B. (2017). Neutrosophic ϰ-structures and their applications in semigroups. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 14(6), 583–598. [Google Scholar]

15. Elavarasan, B., Smarandache, F., Jun, Y. B. (2019). Neutrosophic ϰ-ideals in semigroups. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 28, 273–280. [Google Scholar]

16. Porselvi, K., Elavarasan, B., Smarandache, F., Jun, Y. B. (2020). Neutrosophic ϰ-bi-ideals in semigroups. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 35, 422–434. [Google Scholar]

17. Porselvi, K., Elavarasan, B., Smarandache, F. (2020). Neutrosophic ϰ-interior ideals in semigroups. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 36, 70–80. [Google Scholar]

18. Muhiuddin, G. (2021). P-ideals of BCI-algebras based on neutrosophic N-structures. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(1), 1097–1105. [Google Scholar]

19. Muhiuddin, G., Jun, Y. B. (2020). Further results of neutrosophic subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras based on neutrosophic point. TWMS Journal of Applied and Engineering Mathematics, 10(2), 232–240. [Google Scholar]

20. Muhiuddin, G., Smarandache, F., Jun, Y. B. (2019). Neutrosophic quadruple ideals in neutrosophic quadruple BCI-algebras. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 25, 161–173. [Google Scholar]

21. Muhiuddin, G. (2018). Neutrosophic subsemigroups. Annals of Communication in Mathematics, 1(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar]

22. Muhiuddin, G., Jun, Y. (2018). P-semisimple neutrosophic quadruple BCI-algebras and neutrosophic quadruple p-ideals. Annals of Communication in Mathematics, 1(1), 26–37. [Google Scholar]

23. Hussain, S. S., Hussain, R. J., Muhiuddin, G. (2020). Neutrosophic vague line graphs. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 36, 121–130. [Google Scholar]

24. Kehayopulu, N., Tsingelis, M. (2005). Fuzzy bi-ideals in ordered semigroups. Information Sciences, 171(1–3), 13–28. DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2004.03.015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

25. Kehayopulu, N. (1991). Note on green’s relations in ordered semigroups. Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 36(2), 211–214. [Google Scholar]

26. Cao, Y. (2003). Quotient ordered homomorphisms of ordered semigroups. Communications in Algebra, 31(11), 5563–5579. [Google Scholar]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |