Most developing countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and many more are still fighting against poliovirus. According to the World Health Organization, approximately eighteen million people have been infected with poliovirus in the last two decades. In Asia, still, some countries are suffering from the virus. The stochastic behavior of the poliovirus through the transition probabilities and non-parametric perturbation with fundamental properties are studied. Some basic properties of the deterministic model are studied, equilibria, local stability around the stead states, and reproduction number. Euler Maruyama, stochastic Euler, and stochastic Runge-Kutta study the behavior of complex stochastic differential equations. The main target of this study is to develop a nonstandard computational method that restores dynamical features like positivity, boundedness, and dynamical consistency. Unfortunately, the existing methods failed to fix the actual behavior of the disease. The comparison of the proposed approach with existing methods is investigated.
Jenkins et al. in 2006 formulated a model in which he concluded that the use of monovalent is better than other vaccines. It provides outstanding outbreak control [1]. Haldar et al. [2] introduced the poliovirus vaccine in India. Kalkowska et al. in 2020 represent a differential equation-based stochastic model for poliovirus transmission. The model shows the poliovirus transmission for 2019 to 2023 with a strategic eradication plan [3]. Minor studied the types of polioviruses, vaccination, and eradication of the virus worldwide [4]. Thompson [5] investigated the transmission dynamics of the poliovirus in Nigeria. Duque-Marin et al. [6] studied two types of vaccines in the mathematical model. Denes et al. [7] presented a model which describes polio transmission in tropical regions. Cheng et al. [8] discussed a polio vaccination model in two different age classes. Alba et al. [9] addressed the correlation between climate and vaccination through a mathematical model. Shaghaghi et al. in 2018, studied that the OPV and IVPPvs vaccine was helpful for the eradication of the virus last few years [10]. Shimizu in 2014 [11] explained IPV is very effective against the poliovirus, and the author reviewed the introduction, development, and characterization of the OPV vaccine. In addition, his place in the world was told. Rafique et al. in 2020 presented a mathematical model in which they discovered the dynamics of poliovirus transmission using standard methods with vaccination [12]. Nidia et al. [13] in 2007, examined the effects of the poliovirus on human life and the steps taken to eradicate the virus and discussed what steps we could take in the future to get rid of it. Thompson et al. [14] presented polio outbreaks in the USA. Kalkowska et al. introduced a model to identify poliovirus and opportunities to increase population immunity [15]. Kim et al. [16] presented a model to examine the transmission of virulent circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses. Hillis [17] formulated a model in different regions before using artificial poliovirus vaccination. Mendrazitsky et al. [18] explained a disease of epidemic development model. The model analyzed other properties of polio and its non-equilibrium outbreak dynamics. Debanne et al. [19] presented a mathematical model of poliovirus in America. Naik et al. [20,21] studied the fractional modeling of cancer and HIV infection with the well-known results of stabilities.
The strategy of the paper is as follows. The first section goes to literature, and Section 2 goes to stochastic modeling of poliovirus and its fundamental properties. Section 3 goes to the proposed numerical method and its simulation with current approaches in the literature. Section 4 goes to the paper’s conclusion and remarks.
Poliovirus Model
For any time t, S: represents the class that is influenced by infection, E: represents the class that is disclosed by infection, I: represents an infective class, V: represents immunization class, A: represents the constant immigration rate of the human population. β: is the per unit time probability of infection transmission by the infective population. r: is the reduction in the exposed class due to transmission of infection. v: represents the proportion of recruits in the susceptible class moving to the vaccinated class, v1: is the number of vaccinated exposed populations, b: number of exposed populations moving to the infection class. µ: natural death of the human population, α: disease death rate. The first order, nonlinear, and coupled ordinary differential equations of the poliovirus epidemic model are assumed as follows:
dS=(A−βSI−rβSE−(μ+v)S)dt+σ1SdB(t).
dE=(βSI+rβSE−(b+μ+v1)E)dt+σ2EdB(t).
dI=((b+v1)E−(μ+α)I)dt+σ3IdB(t).
dV=(vS−μV)dt+σ4VdB(t).with initial condition S (0) ≥ 0; E (0) ≥ 0; I (0) ≥ 0; V (0) ≥ 0, and (σi:i=1,2,3,4) is the peutrbation term with B(t) is the Brownian motion [22,23].
Properties [24]
This section studies the positivity and boundedness of the system ((1)–(4)). Let us consider the vector as follows:
U(t)=(S(t),E(t),I(t),V(t)).
And the norm |U(t)|=S2(t)+E2(t)+I2(t)+V2(t).
dU(t)=H(U,t)dt+K(U,t)dW(t).
As, L=∂∂t+∑i=14Hi(U,t)∂∂ui+12∑i,j=14(KT(U,t)K(U,t))i,j×∂2∂Ui∂Uj, where L is differential operator.
If L acts on a function V1∈C2,1(R4×(0,∞);R+) then we denote
LV(U,t)=V1t(U,t)+V1U(U,t)H(U,t)+12Trace(KT(U,t)VUU(U,t)K(U,t)).where transportation is denoted by T.
Theorem 1: For model ((1)–(4)) and any given initial value (S(0),E(0),I(0),V(0))∈R+4, there is a unique solution (S(t),E(t),I(t),V(t)) on t≥0 and will remain in R+4 with probability one.
Proof: By Ito’s formula, the model ((1)–(4)) admits a positive solution in the unique local on [0,τe], and explosion time is denoted by τe. Because the local Lipschitz condition is satisfied by all the coefficients of the model as mentioned earlier.
Next, let us show that the given model ((1)–(4)) admits this solution in the global sense; that is, τe=∞ almost sure.
Let mo=0 be sufficiently large for S(0),E(0),I(0), and V(0) lying with the interval [1mo,mo]. For each integer m≥mo, define a sequence that is so-called stopping times as
τm=inf{tϵ[0,τe]:S(t)∉(1m,m)orE(t)∉(1m,m)orI(t)∉(1m,m)orV(t)∉(1m,m)}.where we set infϕ=∞(ϕ represents the empty set). Since τm is non-decreasing as m→∞,
τ∞=limm→∞τm.
Then τ∞≤τe. To prove, τ∞=∞.
In case of violation of statement, then T>0 and εϵ(0,1) such that
P{τ∞≤T}>ε.this, there is an integer m1>m0 such that
Let us consider the vector C=[S,E,I,V]T of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) of the poliovirus epidemic model ((1)–(4)). We want to calculate the expectation and variance (see Table 1).
The Euler Maruyama approach is cast-off to determine the numerical result of the Eq. (17) by using the values of the parameters given in Table 2 as follows:
Values of parameter [26]
Parameters
DFE
EE
A
0.5
0.5
μ
0.5
0.5
v
0.6
0.6
α
0.0001
00.0001
v1
0.001
0.001
b
0.9
0.9
r
0.5
0.5
σ1
0.04
0.04
β
1.002
2.002
Cn+1=Cn+f(Cn,t)Δt+L(Cn,t)dB.
[Sn+1En+1In+1Vn+1]=[SnEnInVn]+[[A−βSnIn−rβSnEn−μSn−vSnβSnIn+rβSnEn−bEn−μEn−v1EnbEn+v1En−μIn+αInA−μVn]]Δt+[A+βSnIn+rβSnEn+μSn+vSn−βSnIn−rβSnEn0−vSn−βSnIn−rβSnEnβSnIn+rβSnEn+bEn+μEn+v1En−bEn−v1En00−bEn−v1EnbEn+v1En+μIn+αIn0−vSn00vSn+μVn]ΔBnwhere C(0)=Co=[0.5,0.3,0.2,0.1,]T,0≤t≤C and Brownian motion is denoted as B.
Stochastic Nonstandard Finite Difference Method
The stochastic NSFD can be developed for the system ((1)–(4)) as
dSdt=A−βSI−rβSE−(μ+v1)S.
The breakdown of the proposed method for the above equation.
Sn+1=Sn+h[A−βSn+1In−rβSn+1En−(μ+v1)Sn+1+σ1SnΔB1].
Sn+1=Sn+hA+hσ1SnΔB11+hβIn+hrβEn+h(μ+v1).
Similarly, we break the remaining system into a proposed method like (19), as follows:
En+1=En+hβSnIn+hrβSnEn+hσ2EnΔB21+h(b+μ+v1).
In+1=In+h((b+v1)En+σ3InΔB31+h(μ+α).
Vn+1=Vn+hv1sn+σ4VnΔB41+hμ.where, n = 0, 1, 2,…, and discretization gap is denoted by “h”.
Stability Analysis
Theorem 5: The stochastic NSFD method is stable if the eigenvalues of Eqs. (19)–(22) lie in the unit circle for any n≥0.
Proof: Let the functions L1, L2, L3, L4 by assuming ΔBn=0, from the system ((19)–(22)) as follows:
Hence, by using the Mathematica software all the eigen values of the above Jacobean matrix lie in the unit circle if R0<1. Thus, the system ((19)–(22)) is stable.
Now, for endemic equilibrium (EE) K1 = (S*, E*, I*, V*). The given Jacobean matrix is
Using Mathematica software, the most many eigenvalues of the Jacobean is less than one when R0>1. Thus, endemic equilibrium is stable.
Results and Conclusion
Fig. 1 admits the comparative analyses of the proposed approach with current methods in the sense of stochastic. The numerical experimentations can easily conclude that other stochastic numerical methods are conditionally convergent or diverge with larger time step values. The nature of biological properties is not consistent with existing literature methods. For this sake, the nonstandard finite difference is designed to restore the structure of continuous models. Computational methods like stochastic Euler, stochastic Runge Kutta, and Euler Maruyama are presented. Unfortunately, these methods are only applicable for the small step size. These methods diverge when we increase the time and do not obey the dynamical properties (positivity, stability, consistency, and boundedness). The stochastic nonstandard finite difference (SNSFD) method is appropriate for all complex and nonlinear stochastic epidemic models. The stochastic model is a reliable and efficient technique to handle highly nonlinear problems close to nature. The stochastic model is the extension of the deterministic model. We present the non-parametric perturbation technique for the said model. Our focus is to propose an always dynamically consistent, positive, and bounded scheme. That is why we investigate the nonstandard finite difference method in the sense of the stochastic. A comparison section is presented for the efficiency of the processes. Furthermore, we extend this idea to other types of models in the future, as shown in [27–31].
(a) Stochastic NSFD for DFE at h = 0.01 (b) Stochastic NSFD at h = 100 (c) stochastic NSFD for EE at h = 100 (d) Infected class (comparison) at h = 0.01 (e) Infected class (comparison) at h = 0.7 (f) Infected class (comparison) at h = 0.01 (g) Infected class (comparison) at h = 1 (h) Infected class (comparison-RK) of at h = 0.01 (i) Infected class (comparison-RK) at h = 2
Thanks to all authors who contributed equally to preparing the article.
Funding Statement: The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
ReferencesJenkins, P. C., Modlin, J. F. (2006). Decision analysis in planning for polio outbreak in the United States. ,118(2),611–618. DOI 10.1542/peds.2005-2358.Haldar, P., Agrawal, P., Bhatnagar, P., Tandon, R., McGray, S.et al. (2019). Fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine, India. ,97(5),328–334. DOI 10.2471/BLT.18.218370.Kalkowska, D. A., Pallansch, M. A., Wassilak, S. G., Cochi, S. L., Thompson, K. M. (2021). Global transmission of live polioviruses: Updated dynamic modeling of the polio endgame. ,41(2),248–265. DOI 10.1111/risa.13447.Minor, P. D. (2016). An introduction to poliovirus: Pathogenesis, vaccination, and the endgame for global eradication. In: , pp. 1–10. New York, NY: Humana Press.Thompson, J. E. (2014). A class structured mathematical model for polio virus in Nigeria. https://www.math.tamu.edu/undergraduate/research/REU/results/REU_2014/JaneThompsonPaper.pdf.Duque-Marín, E., Vergaño-Salazar, J. G., Duarte-Gandica, I., Vilches, K. (2019). Mathematical modelling of some poliomyelitis vaccination and migration scenarios in Colombia. ,1160,012021. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1160/1/012021.Denes, A., Szekely, L. (2017). Global dynamics of a mathematical model for the possible re-emergence of polio. ,293(1),64–75. DOI 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.08.010.Cheng, E., Gambhirrao, N., Patel, R., Zhowandai, A., Rychtar, J.et al. (2020). A game theoretical analysis of poliomyelitis vaccination. ,499,110298. DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110298.Alba, G. D., Rebolledo, Z. A., Suavez, P. (1976). Influence of climate and vaccination on the incidence of poliomyelitis. ,18(1),509–517.Shaghaghi, M., Soleyman-Jahi, S., Abolhassani, H., Yazdani, R., Azizi, G.et al. (2018). New insights into physiopathology of immunodeficiency associated vaccine derived poliovirus infection systematic review of over five decades of data. ,36(13),1711–1719. DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.059.Shimizu, H. (2016). Development and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccines derived from sabin strains in Japan. ,34(16),1975–1985. DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.015.Rafique, M., Shahid, N., Ahmed, N., Shaikh, T. S., Asif, M.et al. (2020). Efficient numerical method for the solution of the poliovirus epidemic model with the role of vaccination. ,4(16),16–30. DOI 10.32350/sir/2020/44/1052.Jesus, N. H. D. (2007). Epidemics to eradication: the modern history of poliomyelitis. ,4,70. DOI 10.1186/1743-422X-4-70.Thompson, K. M., Wallace, G. S., Tebbens, R. J. D., Smith, P. J., Barskey, A. E.et al. (2012). Trends in the risk of US polio outbreaks and polio virus vaccine availability for response. ,127(1),23–37. DOI 10.1177/003335491212700104.Kalkowska, D. A., Tebbens, R. J. D., Thompson, K. M. (2014). Modeling strategies to increase population immunity and prevent poliovirus transmission in two high risk areas in Northern India. ,210(1),398–411. DOI 10.1093/infdis/jit844.Kim, J. H., Rho, S. H. (2015). Transmission dynamics of oral polio vaccine viruses and vaccine derived poliovirus on networks. ,364(1),266–274. DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.09.026.Hillis, A. (1979). A mathematical model for the epidemiologic study of infectious diseases. ,8(1),167–176. DOI 10.1093/ije/8.2.167.Mendrazitsky, S. B., Stone, L. (2005). Modeling polio as a disease of development. ,237(1),302–315. DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.04.017.Debanne, S. M., Rowland, D. Y. (1996). Statistical certification of eradication of poliomyelitis in the Americas. ,150(1),83–103. DOI 10.1016/S0025-5564(98)00007-8.Naik, P. A., Zu, J., Naik, M. U. D. (2021). Stability analysis of a fractional-order cancer model with chaotic dynamics. ,14(6),1–20. DOI 10.1142/S1793524521500467.Naik, P. A., Zu, J., Owolabi, K. M. (2020). Modeling the mechanics of viral kinetics under immune control during primary infection of HIV-1 with treatment in fractional order. ,545,123816. DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123816.Khan, T., Zaman, G., El-Khatib, Y. (2021). Modeling the dynamics of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) via stochastic epidemic model. ,24,104004. DOI 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104004.El-Khatib, Y., Al-Mdallal, Q. (2022). On Solving SDEs with linear coefficients and application to stochastic epidemic models. ,6(2),280–286. DOI 10.31197/atnaa.948300.Sene, N. (2020). Analysis of the stochastic model for predicting the novel coronavirus disease. ,568. DOI 10.1186/s13662-020-03025-w.Driekmann, O., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., Roberts, M. G. (2009). The construction of next-generation matrices for compartmental epidemic models. ,7(47),873–885. DOI 10.1098/rsif.2009.0386.Agarwal, M., Bhadauria, A. S. (2011). Modeling spread of polio with the role of vaccination. ,6(12),552–571.Xu, Y., Wei, L., Jiang, X., Zhu, Z. (2021). Complex dynamics of a SIRS epidemic model with the influence of hospital bed number. ,26(12),6229–6252. DOI 10.3934/dcdsb.2021016.Lu, C. (2022). Dynamical analysis and numerical simulations on a crowley-martin predator-prey model in stochastic environment. ,413,126641. DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126641.Haokun, Q., Meng, X. (2021). Mathematical modeling, analysis and numerical simulation of HIV: The influence of stochastic environmental fluctuations on dynamics. ,187(1),700–719. DOI 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.027.Shatanawi, W., Raza, A., Arif, M. S., Rafiq, M., Bibi, M.et al. (2021). Essential features preserving dynamics of stochastic dengue model. ,126(1),201–215. DOI 10.32604/cmes.2021.012111.Arif, M. S., Raza, A., Abodayeh, K., Rafiq, M., Bibi, M.et al. (2020). A numerical efficient technique for the solution of susceptible infected recovered epidemic model. ,124(2),477–491. DOI 10.32604/cmes.2020.011121.