@Article{cmes.2025.067108,
AUTHOR = {Sameera V. Mohd Sagheer, U. Nimitha, P. M. Ameer, Muneer Parayangat, Mohamed Abbas, Krishna Prakash Arunachalam},
TITLE = {A Survey of Generative Adversarial Networks for Medical Images},
JOURNAL = {Computer Modeling in Engineering \& Sciences},
VOLUME = {146},
YEAR = {2026},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {--},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/CMES/v146n2/66292},
ISSN = {1526-1506},
ABSTRACT = {Over the years, Generative Adversarial Networks (<mml:math id="mml-ieqn-1"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math>) have revolutionized the medical imaging industry for applications such as image synthesis, denoising, super resolution, data augmentation, and cross-modality translation. The objective of this review is to evaluate the advances, relevances, and limitations of <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-2"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math> in medical imaging. An organised literature review was conducted following the guidelines of <i>PRISMA</i> (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The literature considered included peer-reviewed papers published between <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-3"><mml:mn>2020</mml:mn></mml:math> and <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-4"><mml:mn>2025</mml:mn></mml:math> across databases including PubMed, <i>IEEE</i> Xplore, and Scopus. The studies related to applications of <i>GAN</i> architectures in medical imaging with reported experimental outcomes and published in English in reputable journals and conferences were considered for the review. Thesis, white papers, communication letters, and non-English articles were not included for the same. <i>CLAIM</i> based quality assessment criteria were applied to the included studies to assess the quality. The study classifies diverse <i>GAN</i> architectures, summarizing their clinical applications, technical performances, and their implementation hardships. Key findings reveal the increasing applications of <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-5"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math> for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, reducing data scarcity through synthetic data generation, and supporting modality translation. However, concerns such as limited generalizability, lack of clinical validation, and regulatory constraints persist. This review provides a comprehensive study of the prevailing scenario of <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-6"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math> in medical imaging and highlights crucial research gaps and future directions. Though <mml:math id="mml-ieqn-7"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math> hold transformative capability for medical imaging, their integration into clinical use demands further validation, interpretability, and regulatory alignment.},
DOI = {10.32604/cmes.2025.067108}
}