@Article{ijmhp.2025.071322,
AUTHOR = {Tianyu Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Kenny S. L. Cheah, Ye Zhang},
TITLE = {ChatGPT, Loneliness, and Well-Being among International PhD Students in Malaysia: A Mixed-Methods Study},
JOURNAL = {International Journal of Mental Health Promotion},
VOLUME = {27},
YEAR = {2025},
NUMBER = {12},
PAGES = {2023--2038},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/IJMHP/v27n12/65308},
ISSN = {2049-8543},
ABSTRACT = {<b>Background:</b> Despite access to university counseling services, many students underutilize them due to cultural stigma, language barriers, and perceived irrelevance. As a result, ChatGPT has emerged as an informal, always-available support system. This study investigates how international PhD students in Malaysia navigate loneliness, mental well-being, and social disconnection through interactions with Generative AI (mainly ChatGPT. <b>Methods:</b> Using a mixed-methods design, the study surveyed 155 international doctoral students and analyzed quantitative responses across four dimensions: loneliness, well-being (WHO-5), perceived social support, and AI-facilitated emotional support. Additionally, open-ended responses were examined using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify emergent themes. <b>Results:</b> Quantitative findings showed that ChatGPT use was modestly associated with greater loneliness (r = 0.17) and lower perceived social support (r = −0.16), with only a weak positive link to well-being (r = 0.11). Regression analysis confirmed these small effects, while qualitative themes revealed that students used ChatGPT mainly for emotional venting and productivity, underscoring its value as short-term support but also its potential to displace human interaction. More specifically, thematic analysis revealed two dominant student experiences: (1) emotional venting and calmness, and (2) productivity through non-judgmental dialogue. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that while ChatGPT offers emotional reprieve and academic clarity, it may also displace human interaction. This study highlights the promise and pitfalls of AI-driven mental support in higher education. It urges institutions to enhance peer networks, foster culturally responsive mentoring, and develop ethical AI usage guidelines to support international doctoral students holistically.},
DOI = {10.32604/ijmhp.2025.071322}
}