DOI:10.32604/biocell.2021.014439
www.techscience.com/journal/biocell
| Biocell DOI:10.32604/biocell.2021.014439 | www.techscience.com/journal/biocell |
| Review |
Application of photodynamic therapy in cancer: challenges and advancements
1National Center for International Research of Bio-Targeting Theranostics, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Bio-Targeting Theranostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Targeting Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangxi Talent Highland of Bio-Targeting Theranostics, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China
2Scientific Research and Education Department, The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China
3The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China
4Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530001, China
*Address correspondence to: Zhiming Deng, cdzm_deng@yeah.net; Yong Huang, Huangyong503@126.com
#These authors contributed equally to this work
Received: 27 September 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020
Abstract: Although great achievements have been made in the past decades in medicine, cancer remains a worldwide public health issue. Surgery is usually accompanied by shortcomings such as residual lesions and poor treatment effects, and the successive appearance of other treatment methods, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not changed the postoperative recurrence rate, toxicity, and side effects. However, the advent of photodynamic therapy has greatly improved this situation. Photodynamic therapy is an emerging tumor diagnosis and treatment technology with good application prospects, photodynamic therapy uses a specific wavelength of light to excite a photosensitizer to generate reactive oxygen species, damage tumor blood vessels and promote tumor cell apoptosis, exerting an anti-tumor effect. Photodynamic therapy has become a new clinical anti-tumor therapy due to its clear efficacy, few side effects, and easy use in combination with other therapies. In this review, we summarized the main mechanism, current challenges, and advancements of photodynamic therapy.
Keywords: Photodynamic therapy; Reactive oxygen species; Photosensitizer; Cancer; Mechanism
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2018, cancer has claimed 9.6 million lives, and the global cancer burden will rise to 18.1 million new cases (Siegel et al., 2018). Over the years, researchers have studied the mechanism of cancer cell proliferation, infiltration, and migration to provide new ideas for treatment. Presently, cancer treatments mainly include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. For most patients with solid tumors, surgery is considered the most common and effective way to cure tumors. However, surgery may cause local metastases and positive margins, and radiation therapy and chemotherapy can lead to side effects such as fatigue, nausea and vomiting, hair loss, and blood cell reduction (Balcer-Kubiczek and Eley, 2018; Schirrmacher, 2019).
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) originated in 1900 by Oscar Raab (Raab, 1900), who stumbled on the finding that paramecia exposed to acridine orange and light can be quickly killed, thus, the theory of combining chemical and light energy to induce cell death was proposed. PDT uses a combination of a photosensitizer (PS), light, and oxygen molecules to selectively kill diseased tissues. When the PS absorbs sufficient energy from a specific light wavelength, they activate oxygen molecules in the surrounding environment of the tumor tissue, exerting cytotoxic effects to treat malignant lesions (Yanovsky et al., 2019). In 1975, Kelly et al. (1975) successfully used hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) as a PS to treat bladder cancer, setting a precedent for PDT in cancer treatment. Although PDT is still a new and non-invasive method of tumor treatment, it has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) to treat tumors and non-malignant diseases (Baskaran et al., 2018; Gong et al., 2016; Song et al., 2018) (Fig. 1).
In recent decades, PDT has become an effective method for cancer treatments in scientific research and clinical practice due to its many advantages, including the following: (1) PDT can kill tumor cells locally by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) in a short time, without causing tumor resistance; (2) PS produces apoptosis-inducing ROS only after light exposure, and the time and location of the illumination are controllable, minimizing, the toxicity of the PS to the body; (3) PDT can avoid minor lesions that are invisible to the eyes during surgery, improve the prognosis and prevent recurrence; (4) PDT can be used multiple times for the same tumor site and can be combined with other therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation and gene therapy (Cheong et al., 2015; Hwang et al., 2018; Ozog et al., 2016; Wachowska et al., 2015a). Therefore, PDT is a new clinical method with huge potential advantages.
This review discussed the brief history and development of the first-generation to existing third-generation photosensitizers, and the principles and mechanisms of PDT, current challenges, and future perspectives.
Figure 1: Timeline of select approvals of photodynamic therapy photosensitizers for cancer indications.
Principle of Photodynamic Therapy
Photodynamic therapy mainly comprises three elements: A light source that provides energy for the photodynamic response; PS that can absorb the corresponding light and perform the photodynamic response; and a large amount of ROS produced by electron or energy transfer through excited PS, particularly singlet oxygen (1O2) and superoxide (Ancona et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2019). Consequently, the role of PDT is based on the synergistic effect of excitation light of a precise wavelength, PS, and ROS (Dabrowski and Arnaut, 2015; Zhang and Li, 2018).
In the process of optical imaging in vivo, the penetration depth of photons mainly depends on the absorption and scattering of tissue. Because the wavelength of the light source of traditional is mostly in the visible light region, the tissue penetration of photon is weak and easily interfered by endogenous substances; thus, they cannot be used in the photodynamic therapy of deep tumors (Mansoori et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2018). Correspondingly, the near-infrared (NIR) light has low absorption and strong scattering in biological tissues, indicating that it has a large optical penetration depth. In the range of 650–950 nm, the NIR radiation absorption of tissue components is significantly lower than that of visible light, which is the “first optical window” (NIR-I). The NIR-II window for bioimaging applications is typically from 1000 to 1700 nm (Cao et al., 2019). At the same time, the factors influencing clinical PDT include the intensity of the light source and light frequency. Hence, specific excitation wavelengths need to be selected according to the tumor type and PS for PDT.
A PS is a photosensitive compound that can transit from the ground state to the excited state after being irradiated at a specific wavelength. As the core element of PDT, the characteristics of the PS determine the therapeutic effect. Currently, many PSs belonging to the first and second generations have been approved by the FDA for clinical treatment and trials (Tab. 1).
The first-generation PS, hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD), was isolated and identified in 1980 (Zhang et al., 2018a). Compared with healthy cells, tumor cells can absorb more PS; thus, HpD was considered a suitable cancer diagnosis and PDT drug for a long period (Gray et al., 1967). Peng and his group (Peng et al., 2016) combined HpD with calcitriol to provide an effective and selective way to improve the treatment of breast cancer cells by PDT. However, HpD also has disadvantages such as a long half-life, poor tissue permeability, a low chemical purity, a weak effect on deep pathological tissues, and a long blood circulation time, leading to a poor therapeutic effect and limiting its wide clinical application (Li et al., 2018b; Zhang et al., 2018a).
The second-generation PS is an optimized monomer compound developed based on the first-generation PS, and most of them are heterocyclic porphyrins (Morgan, 1989; Morgan et al., 1985), including bacteriochlorins (Ethirajan et al., 2011), bacterial chlorophyll (Zhang et al., 2017a), chlorin (Zhou et al., 2016), protoporphyrins (Singh et al., 2015), phthalocyanines (Kinsella et al., 2001), and their derivatives. Some compounds also have a non-porphyrin structure, such as 5-aminolevulinic acid, curcumin, quinone, phenothiazine, and psoralen (Harris and Pierpoint, 2012). Most of the porphyrin PS have been developed from the structure of hematoporphyrin, mainly including chlorine and chlorophyll derivatives. For PDT to act on deeper tumor tissues during treatment, modifying groups on porphyrin rings will shift the maximum absorption wavelength of PS toward the NIR region (James et al., 2013). Chlorin e6 (Ce6) is a type of natural chlorophyll extracted from algae and silkworm sand that, is obtained via a series of separation, purification, and modification steps (James et al., 2018). As an excellent new PS, Ce6 has a maximum absorption wavelength of approximately 660 nm and has fewer side effects on healthy tissues, making it a good choice for PDT. Feng et al. (2019) developed a co-delivery albumin nano-system based on bovine serum albumin, cyclopamine and diselenide-containing amphiphilic hyaluronic acid-chlorin e6 polymers. This nano-system had the advantages of targeting tumor cells and releasing Ce6 through redox reaction in the cell and proved its anti-tumor efficacy in in vitro and in vivo experiments. 5-ALA is a non-fluorescent endogenous biochemical substance in PS with a non-porphyrin structure (Harris and Pierpoint, 2012; He et al., 2017a; Mahmoudi et al., 2019), serving as a precursor to the synthesis of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), which is photosensitive in vivo and does not accumulate in large quantities under normal conditions. However, PpIX is generated in rapidly dividing cells in vivo in the presence of a large amount of exogenous 5-ALA, and PDT could be performed after light exposure (Arnaut et al., 2014). The advantages of 5-ALA include its relatively fixed excitation wavelength, lower toxicity, higher enrichment in tumor tissues, and rapid removal from healthy tissues and plasma (Champeau et al., 2019). Presently, ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy has been widely used in neoplastic and non-tumor skin diseases, such as psoriasis (Yi et al., 2019), acne (Barbaric et al., 2018), squamous cell carcinoma (Morton and Braathen, 2018), basal cell carcinoma (Trafalski et al., 2019), and mycosis fungoides (Han et al., 2016). However, the second-generation of PS cannot be injected intravenously due to their poor water solubility (Lucky et al., 2015).
Table 1: First and second-generation photosensitizers approved for clinical use or undergoing clinical trials
Photosensitizers have many innate advantages, but their inherent disadvantages greatly limit their development space in medicine. More specifically, most PSs have a lower solubility in water and higher polymerization capacity, resulting in a lower photodynamic activity. Additionally, these PSs lack selectivity toward diseased tissue or tumor cells, causing serious side effects in humans (Li et al., 2017b; Zhang et al., 2020). However, activatable PSs can be designed to be activated only in the context of specific tumor markers or the tumor microenvironment to effectively avoid light damage to normal tissue and skin, thus improving the precision of PDT (Liu and Li, 2020). Therefore, the development of third-generation PS mostly focuses on novel derivatives of second-generation PSs that enlarges the functional group or molecule, such as linking biospecific targeted molecules (Abrahamse and Hamblin, 2016), binding to molecules that increase biocompatibility (Li et al., 2018b), introducing complexes formed from compounds with specific physiological functions (Li et al., 2017a), and loading on multifunctional carriers (Chilakamarthi and Giribabu, 2017; Shen et al., 2016). They accumulate less in healthy tissues, reducing the effective concentration, and improving safety (Kataoka et al., 2017). Ruiyun Zhang and others (Zhang et al., 2016b) treated breast cancer with nanoparticles (NPs), which are formed by the self-assembly of Ce6 and DOX. Thus, a new type of carrier-free nano-drug was manufactured that plays a synergistic role in tumor treatment. Molina et al. (2016) adopted the method of nanoprecipitation to obtain abundant human serum albumin (HSA) NPs with a diameter of about 295 ± 5 nm, loaded with Ce6, which can reduce the extracellular residence time of the NPs, and play a key role in the drug metabolism and transportation. Core-shell NPs with liposome and polymer compounds, which were loaded with PS, chemotherapeutic drug oxaliplatin, and programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, were synthesized by He et al. (2016); in subsequent experiments, the synergistic effect of PDT, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy on colon cancer was confirmed. A novel nanocluster was synthesized by Cai et al. (2020) that can be hydrolyzed by the tumor-specific carboxylesterase (CE) and penetrate through the deep tumor. PDT can be promoted by enhancing the singlet oxygen generation capacity. Su’s team (Su et al., 2019b) presented a strategy using an amphiphilic diblock copolymer and a stimulus-responsive dye as components to distinguish between healthy and diseased cells. Zhai’s team (Zhai et al., 2019) successfully developed a new class of activated photosensitizers to achieve the transformation of photosensitivity performance from complete inhibition to stress initiation.
A PS has two ground state electrons that rotate in opposite directions (Zhang and Feng, 2018). When the light absorbed by a PS is excited by appropriate energy, an electron will be excited into a higher energy orbit, forming an excited state (Moan et al., 1998; Ochsner, 1997). Excited PSs are extremely unstable. After reacting with surrounding oxygen molecules, they can react with non-oxygen substrates, transfer protons or electrons to generate free radicals, and further interact with ground oxygen to generate ROS (Type I reaction) (Hong et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2018). However, activated PSs can also directly react with the ground state oxygen and then return to the ground state, transfer energy to the ground state oxygen to generate ROS (Type II reaction) (Lucky et al., 2015). Regardless of the Type I reaction or Type II reaction, a large amount of ROS will be produced, leading to apoptosis and necrosis after oxidative stress (Abrahamse and Hamblin, 2016; Gdovin et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2019; Mansoori et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2018) (Fig. 2). In the presence of oxygen, most PSs work primarily in Type II reactions. At the same time, it is generally believed that the photodynamic destruction of 1O2 is dominant. Thus, Type II reaction is considered the main reaction in PDT (Lange and Bednarski, 2016; Xiao et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2020).
Reactive oxygen species are by-products of the body’s metabolism in an aerobic environment. During the process of oxidative phosphorylation of mitochondria to produce ATP, oxygen molecules are generated through Complex I and Complex III of the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) respiratory chain (Battogtokh et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018b). When the body is in a pathological state, electrons escape from the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and oxygen molecules are catalyzed by peroxidase to form peroxide ions or superoxide ions. After continuous transformation in the cell, oxygen radicals with active chemical reactions are formed, including superoxide radicals (·O2−), hydroxyl radicals (·OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2) (Battogtokh et al., 2018; Dryden, 2018). Moreover, cytochromeP450 (CYP450), lipoxidase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and xanthine oxidase (XO) are the pathways of endogenous ROS production (Bouzid et al., 2015; Costa et al., 2016). Some external environments (such as drugs, chemical pollutants, and radiation therapy) can also induce the production of exogenous ROS.
Under normal circumstances, the oxidation and anti-oxidation systems in the cell are in equilibrium (Fig. 3). On the one hand, ROS are continuously generated during the metabolism of healthy cells and participates in many physical functions, such as defense functions and the synthesis of specific physiologically active substances. On the other hand, even if a large amount of ROS is synthesized, it will be adjusted to balance by the body’s enzyme and non-enzyme systems. ROS enzymatic scavengers mainly comprise antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and glutathione S-transferase (GST). They will continuously clear the ROS produced in the cells (He et al., 2017b). Non-enzymatic ROS scavengers can provide an electron to oxygen free radicals to change their unpaired state to neutralize it, such as glutathione (GSH), thioredoxin (TrxA), vitamin C, and vitamin E (Pizzino et al., 2017).
Figure 2: Mechanism of action of PDT.
Figure 3: Schematic diagram of intracellular redox.
However, when the body is in a state of disease or stimulated by foreign substances, this dynamic balance may be affected. Excessive ROS accumulation and weakening of the antioxidant capacity will lead to mitochondria dysfunction, which will lead to oxidative stress (Diaz-Vivancos et al., 2015) and excessive oxidation of DNA (Milisav et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2019; Taverne et al., 2018), proteins (Sies, 2018) and lipids (Su et al., 2019a) in cells, inducing cancer (Klaunig, 2018; Moloney and Cotter, 2018). Kasai and Nishimura (Kasai, 1984) first reported the formation of 8-OHdG by oxygen radicals in 1984. ROS attack the 8th carbon atom of the guanine nucleobase in the DNA molecule to produce 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), leading to the translocation of G:C→T:A, which mediates the activation of proto-oncogenes or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and is involved in tumorigenesis. Chernigina’s team (Chernigina et al., 2017) used the DNA comet assay to measure the DNA levels of leukocytes in tumor-carrying rats treated with PDT to indirectly assess and predict the rate of malignant tumor growth. ROS will change the tertiary structure of proteins, facilitate the formation of protein-protein cross-linking, and degrade proteins and inactivate enzymes. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the phospholipid of biofilm are very sensitive to ROS attack due to the multiple double bonds with active chemical properties. The oxidation and decomposition of lipids easily occur, causing damage to cells and leading to cell death and body damage (Hauck et al., 2019).
Mechanism of Action of Photodynamic Therapy
Studies have shown that the anti-tumor effect of PDT stems from three interrelated mechanisms: (1) Direct cytotoxic effect of ROS on tumor cells; (2) Targeting the tumor vasculature, leading to vascular damage; and (3) Activating the immune system, inducing and regulating immune responses (Lan et al., 2019; Van Straten et al., 2017). Cell death and apoptosis mediated by ROS are the fundamental mechanisms for the effect of PDT (Dobson et al., 2018; Olsen et al., 2017; Zou et al., 2017).
Cytotoxic effects of reactive oxygen species
Gapeyev et al. (2001) proposed that calcium channels of the plasma membrane could be chosen as the target by external periodic signals under the influence of some external factors. A high concentration of ROS can lead to the opening of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition pore (mPTP), causing a reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), the release of cytochrome C, the triggering of the caspase cascade, the destruction of DNA, and accelerate of cell apoptosis. A close relationship exists between the increased ROS content and increased Ca2+ concentration in the process of apoptosis (Bertero and Maack, 2018; Zhang et al., 2016a; Zhang et al., 2016c). Cao’s study (Cao et al., 2011) showed that, in the apoptosis pathway of breast cancer cells, the Ca2+ released in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria was caused by ROS generation, increased Ca2+ resulting in the opening of mPTP and decreased of Δψm. The opening of mPTP and decreased Δψm increased the content of Ca2+ in the mitochondria, further intensifying the opening of the pores in the form of positive feedback and amplifying the apoptosis signal in turn, thus forming a cycle favorable to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway.
As a multi-potent cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) not only induces cell differentiation, survival, and apoptosis but also changes the intracellular redox state in the cell and increases ROS content (Blaser et al., 2016; Pinegin et al., 2018). TNF-α can change the structure of mitochondrial membrane receptors, inhibit the initial stage of the respiratory chain, and leak unpaired electrons to oxygen molecules so that the intracellular mitochondrial permeability and ROS increase, eventually leading to apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2017b). NOX is one of the most important enzymes responsible for ROS formation. It generates superoxide through the assembly of a multisubunit protein complex utilizing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) as the electron donor (Musicki et al., 2010). Studies have shown that FasL can activate Racl protein expression by regulating Ras signaling, and Racl protein can transfer electrons from NADPH to oxygen molecules to form ·O2−. The expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins was then down-regulated by the ROS generated through the ubiquitination pathway, causing the activation of downstream caspase-8 and cell apoptosis (Wang, 2008).
Blood vessels carry nutrients and oxygen to tumor cells, which are essential for tumors to survive and metastasize to other parts of the body. The large blood vessel wall space, poor structure, and insufficient lymphatic circulation in tumor tissue are conducive to PS accumulation (Baluk et al., 2005). However, the tumor area surrounding the normal vasculature may help remove PS. Many specific receptors have been identified in vascular endothelial cells, and the binding of PS to specific vectors such as albumin, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) will enhance the affinity of receptors and uptake of endothelial cells (Bin et al., 2006). When the light source irradiates the PS, singlet oxygen acts on the blood vessel and produces a series of physiological responses such as leukocyte adhesion, platelet aggregation, increased vascular permeability, vasoactive molecule release, and vasoconstriction to prevent tumor vascular remodeling (Dolmans et al., 2002; Hamblin and Abrahamse, 2020; Yanovsky et al., 2019). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key protein that is a major signaling molecule of hypoxic cells (Chatterjee et al., 2013); PDT can down-regulate VEGF (Bucher et al., 2014; Tong et al., 2016), leading to blood stasis, vascular obstruction, and the lack of oxygen and nutrition in tumor tissue, to achieve the photodynamic treatment effect of the tumor. Aleksandra et al. (Kawczyk-Krupka et al., 2018) confirmed that, under hypoxia conditions, ALA-PDT reduces the release of VEGF in SW620 colon cancer cell line, producing an anti-angiogenesis effect.
Photodynamic therapy also triggers an immune response when it induces necrosis of the tumor and its vasculature. PDT activates the body’s innate immunity by triggering inflammation-related signaling pathways, promoting cytokine release, inducing neutrophils and macrophages to accumulate at the tumor site, and activating complement (Maeding et al., 2016; Nath et al., 2019; Showalter et al., 2017). At the same time, macrophages present tumor antigens to CD4+ T lymphocytes by phagocytosis of the killed tumor cells and then activates CD8+ T lymphocytes to induce necrosis and apoptosis of nearby tumor cells, further stimulating specific anti-tumor immunity (Dobson et al., 2018; Wachowska et al., 2015b; Yang et al., 2016). The immune response may occur not only in the PDT site but also in local and distant lymphoid tissues. Kousis’s team (Kousis et al., 2007) reported that PDT induces neutrophilic infiltration into the tumor cells and enhances the strength of the tumor-specific primary immune response and establishment of memory antitumor immune responses. Canti et al. (2010) confirmed the mechanism by which tumor-bearing mice treated with PDT induce a specific immune response against reattack by tumor cells. Therefore, compared with the immunosuppressive effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and other treatment methods, PDT shows superiority to activate the immune response and control tumor recurrence.
Challenges and Future Perspectives
The anti-cancer effect of PDT has been discovered for more than a century. PDT, which is a non-invasive and harmless, involving tumor phototherapy tools, plays an increasingly important role in cancer treatment. However, due to complex biological systems and individual differences in patients, different measures should be taken in different clinical situations, such as, changing the light source, designing new photosensitizers to relieve tumor hypoxia microenvironment and combining chemotherapy, photothermal therapy (PTT), and immunotherapy (Liang et al., 2020). It will be a long time and challenge before PDT becomes a first-line treatment strategy for cancer. Researchers hope that synergistically enhanced interactions will have an effect greater than the sum of the treatments, improving the overall outcome and even achieving the optimal outcome of eradicating malignant solid tumors.
The depth of light penetration is one of the prevalent limitations of the applications PDT. Thus, in recent years, the efficacy of PDT has been improved by using electromagnetic radiation X-rays or fluorescence rays (Mallidi et al., 2016). A series of photodynamic reactions occurs after a PS absorbs light of a specific wavelength, but different irradiation schemes will also produce different results under the same light source. Photons at high fluence rates of light transmission can penetrate the skin to about 3 mm of subcutaneous tissue, but the oxygen content of tumor tissue can also be consumed too quickly. Therefore, the light dosage regimen may also affect the anti-tumor effect, and the optimal dosage regimen may depend on the situation (Keereweer et al., 2014).
Although the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR) can increase the concentration of PSs in tumors, the size distribution, morphology, and surface modification can affect the location. HSA consists of three homologous domains, two of which are the major drug binding sites. In clinical application, PS can be administered intravenously or locally, and different PSs will bind to HSA at different sites, so their distribution and pharmacokinetics will change accordingly. From the moment the drug is administered until the PS reaches the target location, various physical, chemical, and biological events occur that together affect the final location of PS.
The Type I reaction in the PDT process and limited range of singlet oxygen causes a hypoxia microenvironment of the tumor, which enhances the resistance of the tumor to PDT. The combination of PS and a catalyst can alleviate hypoxia. Li et al. (2018a) assembled a new type of nanostructured phthalocyanine that can efficiently promote ROS production through a Type I reaction. Luo’s team (Luo et al., 2020) designed a nano-scale metal-organic framework based on bacterial chlorine, which can perform efficient PDT through Type I and Type II reactions. Deng et al. (2020) synthesized IR780 and catalase-co-loaded liposomes and promoted tumor oxygenation by utilizing the high catalytic efficiency of CAT when it encountered H2O2.
Simple PDT treatment cannot eradicate solid tumors accurately and completely due to its limitations. Chemotherapy drugs inhibit cell division and cause cancer cell death. However, the serious side effects of the drug on the whole body limit its clinical application. Chen et al. (2017) described the covalent coupling of HSA to Ce6 after the self-assembly and encapsulation of catalase and the chemotherapy drug paclitaxel (PTX). This effect significantly regulates TME and enhances the anti-tumor effect.
Photothermal therapy is a technique that converts energy from near-infrared radiation absorbed by certain molecules into heat that destroys cancer cells. Different from PDT using external ROS and other oxygen free radicals to kill cancer cells, PTT uses the combination of light and a special light absorption system to induce local overheat, leading to cell death. Li Wei’s team (Li et al., 2019) generated a nanosystem comprising indocyanine green conjugated to hollow gold nanospheres and oxygen-transporting hemoglobin liposomes that modify targeted peptides to achieve PDT and PTT.
The immune response induced by PDT involves almost all aspects of the immune system, which may become the target of treatment. Gollnick et al. (2002) proposed that, unlike other traditional vaccines, the PDT-generated tumor cell lysates do not require a combination of adjuvants. Ishida et al. (2016) used a monoclonal antibody that binds to epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) with PS to allow deeper penetration into tissue and specifically target and eliminate tumors.
The importance of this review is to briefly introduce the development process, treatment mechanism, current challenges, and prospects for the future of photodynamic therapy. PDT has made great progress with its unique advantages; however, its full potential has yet to be shown. Additionally, the photodynamic reaction is a complex process involving molecular, subcellular, and vascular changes that cause tumor necrosis or apoptosis. There are still many problems in its mechanism of action and clinical application, and clinicians still use a double-edged sword to target and treat tumors. However, as nano-medicine, biology and cutting-edge optical technology development and integration, researchers are working on mechanisms to improve the anti-tumor effect, while reducing the side effects and improving the safety of patients. The combination of knowledge from these fields will ultimately lead to the development of a powerful and immediate treatment for cancer.
We hope this work will raise awareness of the cellular biomechanical aspects of PDT in health and disease, as a direction for the future development of PDT in combination with other therapies, individualized treatment planning, and real-time monitoring, let it play an increasingly important role in the treatment of various malignant tumors and becoming one of the important means of clinical treatment.
Author Contribution: Zixuan Wang, Hongmei Peng and Shi Wei wrote the paper and prepared figures and table. Lu Gan, Linlin Xie and Pan Wu conceived the review. Liping Zhong, Jian He and Yongxiang Zhao reviewed drafts of the paper. Zhiming Deng, Hongliang Tang and Yong Huang analyzed and corrected the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Ethics Approval: Not applicable.
Availability of Data and Materials: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Funding Statement: This review was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82072340), the Major National Science and Technology Projects–Major New Drug Creation (2019ZX09301-132); Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT_15R13); Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Project (No. AD17129003).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |