
@Article{cmc.2023.038639,
AUTHOR = {Zhiguo Chen, Jiabing Cao},
TITLE = {VMCTE: Visualization-Based Malware Classification Using Transfer and Ensemble Learning},
JOURNAL = {Computers, Materials \& Continua},
VOLUME = {75},
YEAR = {2023},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {4445--4465},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/cmc/v75n2/51971},
ISSN = {1546-2226},
ABSTRACT = {The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) effect has made
telecommuting and remote learning the norm. The growing number of
Internet-connected devices provides cyber attackers with more attack vectors.
The development of malware by criminals also incorporates a number of
sophisticated obfuscation techniques, making it difficult to classify and detect
malware using conventional approaches. Therefore, this paper proposes a
novel visualization-based malware classification system using transfer and
ensemble learning (VMCTE). VMCTE has a strong anti-interference ability.
Even if malware uses obfuscation, fuzzing, encryption, and other techniques
to evade detection, it can be accurately classified into its corresponding
malware family. Unlike traditional dynamic and static analysis techniques,
VMCTE does not require either reverse engineering or the aid of domain
expert knowledge. The proposed classification system combines three
strong deep convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, MobilenetV1, and
MobilenetV2) as feature extractors, lessens the dimension of the extracted
features using principal component analysis, and employs a support vector
machine to establish the classification model. The semantic representations of
malware images can be extracted using various convolutional neural network
(CNN) architectures, obtaining higher-quality features than traditional
methods. Integrating fine-tuned and non-fine-tuned classification models
based on transfer learning can greatly enhance the capacity to classify
various families of malware. The experimental findings on the Malimg dataset
demonstrate that VMCTE can attain 99.64%, 99.64%, 99.66%, and 99.64%
accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall, respectively.},
DOI = {10.32604/cmc.2023.038639}
}



