@Article{ee.2025.074439, AUTHOR = {Xiutai Cao, Yuxin Sun, Bowen Shi, Hao Zhang, Hongli Tang, Yongbin Bi, Huiying Zhong}, TITLE = {Numerical Simulation of CO₂ Huff-and-Puff Mechanism and CO₂/N₂ Synergistic Huff-and-Puff in the Edge-Bottom Water Reservoirs}, JOURNAL = {Energy Engineering}, VOLUME = {}, YEAR = {}, NUMBER = {}, PAGES = {{pages}}, URL = {http://www.techscience.com/energy/online/detail/25516}, ISSN = {1546-0118}, ABSTRACT = {With the steady advancement of China’s “Dual-Carbon” goals, CO₂ huff-and-puff technology has become one of the mainstream methods for enhancing oil recovery (EOR) in oilfields. However, differences in sweep radius of CO₂, CO₂-oil interaction mechanisms, injection parameters, and huff-and-puff modes between conventional heavy-oil and light-oil reservoirs still require further investigation. The NP oilfield consists of an upper heavy-oil zone and a lower light-oil zone, with the reservoir inclined at a certain angle. Taking this oilfield as the study area, a positively rhythmic reservoir geological model was established. A compositional numerical simulation approach was employed to analyze the sweep radius of CO₂ and the mechanisms of oil-saturation reduction of various huff-and-puff cycles under edge-water reservoir conditions. To address the issue of insufficient energy supply in well groups within closed fault blocks, the effects of synergistic CO₂–N₂ huff-and-puff on the development performance of conventional heavy-oil and light-oil reservoirs were further investigated. The results show that the sweep radius of CO₂ huff-and-puff in heavy-oil reservoirs is significantly larger than that in light-oil reservoirs. Under a 10 m oil-column height, the maximum sweep radius reaches 100 m for heavy oil reservoirs, compared with 65 m for light oil reservoirs. Moreover, the average oil-saturation reduction per cycle in heavy-oil reservoirs is 0.58% higher than that in light-oil reservoirs. For well groups in closed fault blocks with weak energy supply, synergistic CO₂–N₂ huff-and-puff can effectively enhance oil recovery, benefiting from the gravity override effect of N₂. Based on numerical simulation, the optimal CO₂: N₂ injection ratios for synergistic huff-and-puff were determined to be 2.1:1 for heavy oil and 1.67:1 for light oil. These findings provide important theoretical support for optimizing CO₂ flooding development strategies in reservoirs of similar types.}, DOI = {10.32604/ee.2025.074439} }