@Article{ee.2026.074048,
AUTHOR = {Federico Minelli, Diana D’Agostino, Vennapusa Jagadeeswara Reddy, Panagiotis Michailidis},
TITLE = {Towards Resilient Cities: Robust Selection of Rooftop Renewable Energy Technologies in Mediterranean Multifamily Buildings},
JOURNAL = {Energy Engineering},
VOLUME = {},
YEAR = {},
NUMBER = {},
PAGES = {{pages}},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/energy/online/detail/26674},
ISSN = {1546-0118},
ABSTRACT = {This study investigates the problem of prioritizing rooftop renewable energy (RE) system configurations for a multi-family residential building in Mediterranean climate. The analysis focuses on fixed-tilt photovoltaics (PV), single-axis and dual-axis tracking PV, and small vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWT), each assessed with and without lithium-ion storage. A co-simulation framework is used, coupling EnergyPlus building-HVAC system simulation with PV and wind generation modeling and rule-based battery dispatch to evaluate hourly demand–supply interactions. Three decision criteria are considered for each alternative: total system cost, annual building electric energy demand reduction, and net avoided life-cycle emissions. Stakeholder preferences are elicited via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), considering the building owner as the decision-maker. The design alternatives are then ranked with three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods (TOPSIS, ARAS, and COPRAS) and a global rank is computed through an ensemble (Borda) aggregation. Results show that due to roof-area constraints, dense fixed-tilt PV system layouts are favored to achieve maximum annual generation (≈60.8 MWh per year), whereas tracking systems achieve higher specific yield but lower system capacity per roof because of increased need of spacing and maintenance corridors. Design alternatives that incorporate energy storage significantly raise self-consumption and demand reduction. Indeed, fixed PV with large storage can reach high annual coverage of building electric energy consumption, while the same PV without storage can reduce it by ~43.7%. VAWT options contribute modestly to energy demand reduction given unfavorable urban wind conditions and their shorter lifetime. Under owner-centric weights that emphasize cost, the ensemble ranking prioritizes low-CAPEX PV solutions (dual-axis PV without storage, single-axis PV without storage, single-axis PV with small storage, and fixed-tilt PV). Instead, design alternatives encompassing large energy storage and small-wind alternatives occupy the lower ranks. The findings provide useful insights and a stakeholder-wise tool to select rooftop RE technologies on Mediterranean residential buildings, balancing economic feasibility with energy and environmental performance.},
DOI = {10.32604/ee.2026.074048}
}