@Article{fdmp.2026.077360,
AUTHOR = {Yushe Li, Peishe Wang, Suoying He, Chunguan Zhou, Feiyang Long, Zongjun Long, Maojin Fu, Jinyang Sheng, Zhe Geng, Shuzhen Zhang, Huimin Pang, Lin Xia, Ghulam Qadir Chaudhary, Ming Gao},
TITLE = {Numerical Assessment of Novel Windbreak Designs for Flow Control and Heat Transfer Enhancement in Natural Draft Dry Cooling Towers},
JOURNAL = {Fluid Dynamics \& Materials Processing},
VOLUME = {22},
YEAR = {2026},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {0--0},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/fdmp/v22n2/66516},
ISSN = {1555-2578},
ABSTRACT = {This study aims to mitigate crosswind-induced performance degradation in Natural Draft Dry Cooling Towers used in power plants by developing and assessing windbreak configurations that enhance ventilation while minimizing additional airflow resistance. Three novel windbreak designs, namely single-windbreak configuration with curved profile, double-windbreak configuration with curved profile, and double-windbreak configuration with inverted curved profile, are proposed accordingly and evaluated against conventional solutions. Three-dimensional numerical models of a 120 m high NDDCT equipped with these windbreaks, together with a conventional Y-shaped windbreak, are developed for systematic comparison. The results demonstrate that windbreak effectiveness strongly depends on crosswind intensity. At low crosswind speeds of 0–6 m/s, the Y-shaped windbreak provides the greatest enhancement, increasing the ventilation rate by 25.45% and the heat rejection rate by 21.37% at 6 m/s compared with the no-windbreak configuration. In contrast, under moderate to strong crosswinds of 6–18 m/s, the single-windbreak configuration with curved profile exhibits superior performance. At 18 m/s, it increases the ventilation rate by 148.88% and the heat rejection rate by 79.74% relative to the baseline case, outperforming the Y-shaped windbreak by 26.59% in ventilation rate and 17.01% in heat rejection capacity. Analysis of airflow structure, temperature fields, and velocity distributions confirms that the single-windbreak configuration with curved profile more effectively suppresses crosswind penetration and promotes stable upward airflow at higher wind speeds. Based on a comprehensive assessment of aerodynamic and thermal performance, the Y-shaped windbreak is recommended for regions where crosswind speeds remain below 6 m/s, whereas the single-windbreak configuration with curved profile is preferable for sites exposed to stronger crosswinds exceeding this threshold.},
DOI = {10.32604/fdmp.2026.077360}
}