images Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany images

DOI: 10.32604/phyton.2022.021382


N-Exponential Fertilization Could Affect the Growth and Nitrogen Accumulation of Metasequoia glyptostroboides Seedling in a Greenhouse Environment

Jiasen Wu1, Genping Tong2, Rui Guo2, Zihao Ye1, Jin Jin1 and Haiping Lin1,3,*

1Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration, Hangzhou, 311300, China
2Qingliangfeng National Nature Reserve Administration, Lin’an, 311300, China
3State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Hangzhou, 311300, China
*Corresponding Author: Haiping Lin. Email: 13396557805@163.com
Received: 11 January 2022; Accepted: 23 February 2022

Abstract: Metasequoia glyptostroboides (M. glyptostroboides) is a unique plant species related to relic flora in China. It plays a positive role in afforestation and its long-term protection with high paleoclimate research value. However, due to the nutrients-supply deficiency, it is a big challenge to cultivate the high-quality seedlings of M. glyptostroboides. In this study, a pot experiment in a greenhouse environment was carried out to identify the effect of N-exponential fertilization on the growth and nutrient distribution of M. glyptostroboides seedling. The M. glyptostroboides rooted seedlings with 12-month growth were chosen. Different N fertilizer levels with conventional fertilization (CF: 5.0 g seedling−1), exponential fertilization including EF1, EF2, EF3 and EF4 were determined. The relevant growth indexes were measured after 210-day growth. The results indicated that non-significant differences in seedlings’ height and ground diameter were found among the above treatments (P > 0.05); At the same time, N-exponential fertilization promoted the M. glyptostroboides’s biomass in different organs (P < 0.05), with the maximum total biomass under EF3 treatment. The N accumulation in root and stem of the N-exponential fertilization treatments were increased in to some extent (P < 0.05). The maximum N accumulation was also found under EF3 treatment. Therefore, steady-state nutrition and superior growth performance of M. glyptostroboides could be obtained by N-exponential fertilization of 5.0 g cutting−1.

Keywords: Metasequoia glyptostroboides seedling; nitrogen exponential fertilization; plant growth; biomass; nutrient supply

1  Introduction

The plant seedling’s quality directly determines the survival of post-planting seedling especially in the afforestation process [1]. The high-quality seedlings with strong adaptability and rapid growth, are regarded as a sustainable management techniques. Normally, “nutrient-loaded” seedlings are chosen as one of the high-quality seedlings and are widely applied in the afforestation [2]. In that case, fertilizer application is a necessary measure to promote the quality of target seedlings [3]. Nitrogen (N) is a fundamental nutrient for plant survival [4]. Therefore, suitable N fertilizer application is important to improve the plant growth, however, excessive N application can lead to N loss which could further cause potential environmental problems such as eutrophication in water bodies [5].

Conventional fertilization (CF) regime supplies nutrients at the same rate during the fertilizer application period, inducing toxicity to young seedlings and nutrient loss in case the plant does not assimilate at its early-growth stage [3]. This application method also causes nutrient deficiencies at the growth stages, requiring more nutrients for seedling growth [4]. Compared to the conventional fertilization, the exponential fertilization can induce plant steady-state luxury nutrients consumption, which could effectively improve the nutrient uptake of plant and enhance the seedlings’ competitiveness, so as to better adapt to the specific environment of the plantation [68]. At present, exponential fertilization has been studied on a variety of tree species. Previous research has shown that the biomass accumulation of Japanese Larix kaempferi seedlings in a certain range of N supply level increased with the increase of N supply, but decreases if the amount of N is excessive [9]. While other results show that the N content of seedlings increases exponentially or linearly under exponential fertilization, indicating that the growth and nutrient absorption of seedlings could well be matched through the exponential fertilization [10]. In terms of short-term effects, medium nitrogen load is the most effective in promoting nutrient uptake in nursery and improving transplanting reaction of conventionally fertilized young plants [11]. Meanwhile, researchers demonstrated that the use of exponential fertilization could well promote the growth of Aralia elata young plant, improve the nutritional status, and meet the nutrient requirements of seedlings in different periods. Therefore, the survival rate and growth effect of seedlings were much better [12]. However, there were no significant differences in Tsuga heterophylla seedling height, biomass and nutrient concentration, and the effects on biomass and nitrogen content of stem and leaf were not significant under exponential fertilization [13]. And the growth of Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings after transplanting was not obvious under the condition of exponential fertilization as well [14]. Similar to the above studies, the research on the container seedlings of Quercus variabilis showed that the application of fertilizer had non-significant impact on the seedling height and ground diameter [15]. From the previous study, we can find that the plant species have different responses to the exponential fertilizer application which should be further studied.

Metasequoia glyptostroboides (M. glyptostroboides) is a unique plant species of the taxaceae family in China. It was discovered in Lichuan City, Hubei Province in the 1940s, and has been included in the 2013 IUCN red list of endangered species [16]. M. glyptostroboides belongs to the tree species which is relatively resistant to water flooding, and its planting can not only improve the soil quality but also promote the growth and development of M. glyptostroboide’s protection [17,18]. Therefore, M. glyptostroboide is the main afforestation tree species in coastal shelter-belt and plain river network in east China [19]. It is also grown in countries other than China, such as Canada and Australia [20]. Studies have found it to be well developed in both the eastern and western United States [21]. At present, research has been done on M. glyptostroboides seeding, seedling cultivation, cuttage propagation, etc. [2224], but there were few studies on the effects of different fertilization on. M. glyptostroboide. In our study, different fertilization on seedling height, ground diameter, biomass, nitrogen content and accumulation of leaves, stems and roots of 1-year M. glyptostroboides seedlings were studied under potted conditions. We hypothesized that N-exponential fertilization promoted the M. glyptostroboides’s biomass and increased N accumulation in root and stem. Our study revealed the law of nitrogen requirement of M. glyptostroboides seedlings and provide a basis for nutrient management for M. glyptostroboides seedlings.

2  Material and Methods

2.1 Study Site

The study site was located in the forestry station seedling breeding base of Tongxiang City, Zhejiang Province (30°41′52′′N, 120°32′38′′E), with a subtropical monsoon climate. The annual average precipitation is 1212.3 mm, with annual average sunshine hours of 1983.4 h, annual average temperature of 16.9°C, and annual frost-free period of 244 d [25]. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with a temperature of 25°C to 35°C and the relative air humidity of 55% to 75%.

2.2 Study Material

In April, 2019, a total of 225 one-year-old uncultivated M. glyptostroboides seedlings with basically the same growth were selected, the average stem and seedling height were 0.42 and 63.0 cm, respectively. They were planted in pots of 28 cm × 23 cm × 24 cm (height × base diameter × upper diameter). 10 kg paddy soil was filled for every experimental pot. The soil belonged to Ferralsols based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) [26]. The physical and chemical properties of soil were measured (pH: 6.6, organic carbon: 4.8 g kg−1, alkaline nitrogen: 22.7 mg kg−1, available phosphorus: 0.9 mg kg−1, available potassium: 55.5 mg kg−1)

2.3 Experimental Design and Fertilization Regimes

A completely randomized design was adopted, with conventional fertilization (CF, 5.0 g seedling−1) and 4 exponential fertilization (EF1, EF2, EF3 and EF4: 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 8.0 g cuttling−1, respectively). The P2O5 was 14% superphosphate (10.0 g seedling−1) and K2O was 50% potassium sulfate (5.0 g cuttling−1), which were mixed together as the base fertilizer when preparing the culture substrate. There were 15 seedlings for each treatment with 3 repetitions. The conventional fertilization provided N for 1.00 g seedling−1 per month. The exponential fertilization provided N based on exponential fertilization theory, which is described by Ingestad et al. [27]. And the corresponding fertilization dose are listed in Table 1.


2.4 Plant Sampling and Chemical Analysis

At the end of our experiment, 5 seedlings of different treatments were collected by the whole harvest method with 3 repetitions. The height and ground diameter of seedlings were measured by tapeline and vernier caliper. The roots, stems and leaves were washed with clean water and then rinsed with deionized water. Their roots, stems, and leaves were obtained, respectively. Finally, placed in envelopes and placed in an oven at 105°C for 30 min, then dried at 70°C to a constant weight, and the dry matter mass of different organs, namely biomass, was measured and calculated as described as Wu et al. [3].

After the dried plant samples were crushed, they were sifted through a 0.5 mm sieve and determined by elemental analyzer (Germany Elementer, uario EL cube).

Nitrogen accumulation (mg seedling1) = nitrogen mass fraction of different organs (mg g1)×biomass of corresponding organs (g) (1)

Biomass harvesting index (g g1) = biomass/total N application amount (2)

N harvest index(%)=N accumulation/total N application amount×100 (3)

2.5 Data Analysis

The data are presented as average ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical variance analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA, and the least significant difference (LSD) method was used for multiple comparisons in a SPSS version 21.0 [28,29]. The 0.05 for significant test was applied. The homogeneity test for raw data was conducted [30,31]. The graphs of statistical results were produced suing Origin 8 software.

3  Results

3.1 Seedling Height and Ground Diameter of M. glyptostroboides under Different N-Fertilization

Compared with CF, the seedling height of the four EF treatments increased by 6.3%–17.0%, and the ground diameter increased by 2.0%–7.1% (Fig. 1). The average seedlings height treated with EF1 was 96.8 cm, which was obviously higher than that of CF (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in seedlings’ ground diameter among treatments (P > 0.05).


Figure 1: The external properties of seedlings with different treatments

3.2 The Biomass of M. glyptostroboides Seedlings under Different Fertilization Treatments

In Table 2, EF treatments promoted the roots and stems biomass accumulation of M. glyptostroboides. Compared with the CF, EF treatments significantly increased the root biomass, total biomass and root-to shoot ratio by 45.1%–78.0%, 20.4%–22.5% and 22.4%–46.9% (P < 0.05), respectively. The stem biomass of EF1, EF2 and EF3 was also significantly higher than that of CF (P < 0.05), including EF3 root biomass (48.4 g cutting−1) and the root-to-shoot ratio (0.72) significantly higher than EF1, EF2, EF4 (P < 0.05). The leaf biomass of M. glyptostroboides was between 22.4 and 25.5 g cutting−1, and there was no significant difference among different fertilization treatments (P > 0.05).


3.3 Nitrogen Contents and Nitrogen Accumulation of M. glyptostroboidesunder Different Fertilization Treatments

The N mass fraction of M. glyptostroboides seedlings roots ranged from 28.7 to 32.3 g kg−1 (Table 3), and EF1 was significantly higher than that of CF and EF4 (P < 0.05). The N content of the stem ranged from 16.7 to 19.0 g kg−1, and non-significant difference was observed among different treatments (P > 0.05). The N mass fraction of the leaves ranged from 29.2 to 32.3 g kg−1. Compared with CF, the nitrogen mass fraction of EF reduced by 3.0% to 9.7%, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).


Exponential fertilization significantly increased the accumulation of nitrogen in the roots of M. glyptostroboides seedlings. Compared with CF, the accumulation of nitrogen in EF treatment significantly increased by 49.2%–84.4% (P < 0.05), and the accumulation of nitrogen in EF3 treatment was significantly higher than that in EF1, EF2 and EF4 (Table 3). The nitrogen accumulation of EF1, EF2 and EF3 treated stems was significantly higher than CF (P < 0.05), increasing by 32.5%∼34.9%. The accumulation of nitrogen in leaves ranged from 656.9 to 796.4 mg⋅ plant−1, with no significant difference among different treatments (P > 0.05). The total nitrogen accumulation of plants was the highest by EF3 treatment, reaching 2938.9 mg cutting−1.

3.4 Nitrogen Distribution of M. glyptostroboides with Different Fertilization

The order of N distribution rate in each organ of the seedling of the M. glyptostroboides was as follows: root > stem > leaf, the proportion of N accumulation in root, stem and leaf ranged from 37.7% to 49.1%, 24.6% to 28.0%, and 24.5% to 35.0%, respectively (Fig. 2). Compared with CF, nitrogen accumulation in EF treated roots increased significantly, while nitrogen accumulation in leaves decreased significantly (P < 0.05).


Figure 2: M. glyptostroboides’s N-distribution with different treatments

3.5 Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of M. glyptostroboides Seedlings under Different Fertilization

As can be seen from Table 4, the biomass and nitrogen harvest index of EFs (EF1, EF2 and EF3) were higher than CF (P < 0.05), while no significant difference was found between the CF and EF4 treatment whatever the biomass harvest index and nitrogen harvest index (P > 0.05).


4  Discussion

Since the external indicators such as height and ground diameter are essential to judge the status of plant growth, they are always determined to reflect the quality of seedlings. Compared with CF, the seedling height of EF1 treatment increased significantly (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the seedling height and ground diameter between other treatments. Song et al. [32] also showed the effect of exponential fertilization on the ground diameter of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (Thunb.) Oerst. was not significant. While Wu et al. [3] found that compared to the no N fertilizer application treatment, the external properties of N-fertilized seedlings of Chinese fir were significantly higher (P < 0.05), with EF2 having the best properties. Therefore, the proper N supply can improve the growth of M. glyptostroboides cuttings [33,34].

The biomass is regarded as another external indicator to reflect plant productivity. The applied nitrogen often affects the distribution of biomass in different parts of plant. Compared with CF, EF treatment significantly improved the accumulation of root and stem biomass (Table 2). Compared with conventional fertilization, the fertilizer using efficiency of exponential fertilization is higher, which indicates that exponential fertilization can effectively convert the N absorbed by plants into plant biomass [35]. In the exponential fertilization, the biomass of different organs increased first and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application, among which the biomass of stem and leaf was the highest after EF2 treatment (3.0 g seedling−1), while the biomass of root and total biomass was the largest after EF3 treatment (5.0 g seedling−1). When nitrogen application continued to increase, the plant biomass decreased slightly. For example, compared to other EFs, the EF4 decreased slightly the root biomass. Such phenomena could be related to the N supply, as N was insufficient, plants roots would increase the N absorption and further promote the root biomass [3]. An appropriate amount of exponential fertilization can promote the growth of seedlings [36] and significantly increase the dry matter mass of target plant seedlings [15,37]. On the contrary, excessive nitrogen application often causes mild poisoning of seedlings [10,12], thus inhibiting the growth and biomass accumulation of seedlings [30]. At the final harvest stage, the highest ratio (0.71) of root to shoot biomass was observed in EF3, while the lowest (0.51) was found in CK. Boivin et al. [38] reported that the growth rate of root was much higher than that of shoot during the late fertilization phase. This difference may be due to the different experimental varieties and fertilization application method [39].

Fertilization is a main factor affecting N concentration and the utilization effciency of seedlings. The improvement of N utilization efficiency can promote the quality of seedlings, thus increasing the survival rate of afforestation. The nutritional status of seedlings in vivo is an internal physiological indicator for evaluating the quality of seedlings. And nitrogen mass fraction and accumulation amount of seedlings under different fertilizers are different [40]. And after seedling afforestation, the effect of afforestation depends on the initial nutrient status of seedling, because the nutrient absorbed by root system from the soil is limited [41]. The nitrogen mass fraction in the roots of M. glyptostroboides seedlings treated with EF1 was significantly higher than that of CF and EF4, while the difference in nitrogen mass fraction of stems and leaves was not significant among different treatments, mainly because M. glyptostroboides was a deciduous tree. When sampling on October 20, the leaves had turned slightly yellow, and part of nitrogen would be transferred to roots and stems. It is also possible that N element index fertilization changed the morphology of seedling roots and enhanced the ability of seedling roots to absorb nutrients [42]. Nitrogen accumulation in roots and stems treated by EF was significantly higher than CF (P < 0.05), and increased first and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application, among which, nitrogen accumulation in root was the highest with EF3 treatment. While nitrogen accumulation in stem and leaf was highest by EF2 treatment. Salifu et al. [43] believed that when nitrogen supply was insufficient, the nutrient content of different organs of seedling would increase with the nitrogen supply increasing. When nitrogen supply surpasses seedling demand, nutrient content in different organs decreases [44].

5  Conclusions

Nitrogen exponential fertilization effectively promoted the roots and stems growth and biomass accumulation of M. glyptostroboides, and improved the nitrogen nutrient status and nutrient carrying capacity of seedling roots and stems. The total biomass and nitrogen accumulation of EF3 treatment (5.0 g seedling−1) reached the maximum value of 115.24 g seedling−1 and 2938.96 mg seedling−1, respectively. So it was the best exponential fertilization method for M. glyptostroboides greenhouse seedling cultivation.

Authorship: The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Wu J. S., Lin H.; data collection: Ye Z. H.; Jin J., analysis and interpretation of results: Wu J. S.; Tong G.; Guo R.; draft manuscript preparation: Wu J. S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgement: We gratefully acknowledge Miss Jiemiao Liu for the field work.

Funding Statement: This study was supported by the Natural Science Fundation of Zhejiang Province (LY20C160004).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.


 1.  Wang, X., Hu, Y., Liaquat, F., Zhang, X., Ye, K. et al. (2022). Effects of nitrogen exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient concentration of Hydrangea macrophylla seedlings. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 91 (2), 395–407. DOI 10.32604/phyton.2022.017981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 2.  Liu, J., Zhu, X., Cai, G., Bei, L., Cao, R. et al. (2018). Effects of N exponential on growth and nutrient accumulation of Taxodium ascendens seedlings. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 46(10), 1–4. DOI 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.10.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 3.  Wu, J. S., Lin, H. P., Guo, L. H., Dong, J. Q., Zhang, L. Y. et al. (2019). Biomass and nutrients variation of Chinese fir rooted cuttings under conventional and exponential fertilization regimes of nitrogen. Forests, 10(8), 615. DOI 10.3390/f10080615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 4.  Jin, J., Wang, L., Müller, K., Wu, J., Wang, H. et al. (2021). A 10-year monitoring of soil properties dynamics and soil fertility evaluation in Chinese hickory plantation regions of Southeastern China. Scientific Reports, 11, 23531. DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-02947-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 5.  Fang, X., Zhang, J., Meng, M., Guo, X., Wu, Y. et al. (2017). Forest-type shift and subsequent intensive management affected soil organic carbon and microbial community in Southeastern China. European Journal of Forest Research, 136, 689–697. DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1065-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 6.  Oliet, J. A., Planelles, R., Aptero, F., Valverde, R., Jacobs, D. et al. (2009). Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid condition: Relative influence of seeding morphology and mineral nutrition. New Forests, 37, 313–331. DOI 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 7.  Dai, W., Li, Y., Fu, W., Jiang, P., Zhao, K. et al. (2018). Spatial variability of soil nutrients in forest areas: A case study from subtropical China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 181, 827–835. DOI 10.1002/jpln.201800134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 8.  Pokharel, P., Kwak, J. H., Chang, S. X. (2017). Growth and nitrogen uptake of jack pine seedlings in response to exponential fertilization and weed control in reclaimed soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 53(6), 701–713. DOI 10.1007/s00374-017-1213-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

 9.  Wei, H. X., Xu, C. Y., Ma, L. Y., Jiang, L. N., Jiang, C. J. et al. (2010). Nutrient upkate of larix olgensis seedlings in response to different exponential regimes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(3), 685–690. [Google Scholar]

10. Hu, Y., Li, C., Jiang, L., Liang, D., Zhao, X. (2020). Growth performance and nitrogen allocation within leaves of two poplar clones after exponential and conventional nitrogen applications. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 154, 530–537. DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.06.053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

11. Boivin, J. R., Salifu, K. F., Timmer, V. R. (2004). Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings: Intensive loading and outplanting response on greenhouse bioassays. Annals of Forest Science, 61(8), 737–745. DOI 10.1051/forest:2004073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

12. Wei, H., Chen, G., Chen, X., Zhao, H. (2020). Growth and nutrient uptake in Aralia elata seedling exposed exponential fertilization under different illumination spectra. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 23, 644–652. DOI 10.17957/IJAB/15.1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

13. Hawkins, B. J., Burgess, D., Mitchell, A. K. (2005). Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(4), 1002–1016. DOI 10.1139/X05-026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

14. Everett, K. T., Hawkins, B. J., Kiiskila, S. (2007). Growth and nutrient dynamics of douglas-fir seedlings raised with exponential or conventional fertilization and planted with or without fertilizer. Canada Journal of Forestry Research, 37, 2552–2562. DOI 10.1139/X07-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

15. Li, G. L., Zhu, Y., Jiang, L., Shi, W. H., Wang, J. et al. (2012). Effect of exponential fertilization on growth and nitrogen storage of containerized Quercus variabilis seedlings. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 40(11), 6–9. DOI 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2012.11.030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

16. Lin, Y., Ai, X. R., Yao, L., Guo, Q. J., Zhang, M. X. et al. (2017). Population structure and dynamics of Metasequoia glyptostroboides parent trees. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36(6), 1531–1538. DOI 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201706.014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

17. Ma, P. (2015). Dynamics of soil nutrient contents and enzyme activities after short-term revegetation by Metasequoia glyptostroboides saplings in the hydro-fluctuation zone of the three gorges reservoir. Chongqing: Southwest University Press. [Google Scholar]

18. Ma, P., Li, C. X., Ren, Q. S., Yang, Y., Ma, J. (2015). Effects of simulated submergence and drought on the nutrient content of soils planted with Dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) saplings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(23), 7763–7773. DOI 10.5846/stxb201405110966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

19. Guo, W. H., Wang, H., Yu, M. K., Wu, T. G., Han, Y. Z. (2017). Latitude variation mechanism of leaf traits of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in eastern coastal China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(3), 772–778. DOI 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

20. Kuser, J. E. (1998). Metasequoia glyptostroboides: Fifty years of growth in North America. Arnoldia. http://arnoldia.arboretum.harvard.edu/pdf/articles/1998-58-4-metasequoia-glyptostroboides-fifty-years-of-growth-in-north-america.pdf. [Google Scholar]

21. Liu, H., Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Jiang, Y., Deng, S. et al. (2020). Effect of artificially accelerated aging on the vigor of Metasequoia glyptostroboides seeds. Journal of Forest Research, 31, 769–779. DOI 10.1007/s11676-018-0840-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

22. Wang, X. Q., Ma, L. Y., Guo, B. X. (2004). History and research progress on the silviculture of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in China. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 19(2), 82–88. [Google Scholar]

23. Fu, W., Dong, J., Ding, L., Yang, H., Ye, Z. et al. (2022). Spatial correlation of nutrients in a typical soil-hickory system of southeastern China and its implication for site-specific fertilizer application. Soil& Tillage Research, 217, 105265. DOI 10.1016/j.still.2021.105265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

24. Li, S. X., Yao, Y. L., Dai, X. G., Yin, T. M., Gao, H. D. (2012). Effects of environmental conditions and covering soil after sowing on seedling emergence rate of Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 32(2), 26–30. DOI 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.02.020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

25. Dong, J., Zhou, K. N., Jiang, P. K., Wu, J., Fu, W. J. (2021). Revealing vertical and horizontal variation of soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen and C:N ratio in subtropical forests of southeastern China. Journal of Environmental Management, 112483. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

26World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) (2006). A Framework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]

27. Ingestad, T., Lund, A. (1979). Nitrogen stress in birch seedling: Growth technique and growth. Physiologia Plantarum, 45, 137–148. DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1979.tb01678.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

28. Wu, W., Lin, H., Fu, W., Penttinen, P., Li, Y. et al. (2019). Soil organic carbon content and microbial functional diversity were lower in monospecific Chinese hickory stands than in natural Chinese hickory-broad-leaved mixed forests. Forests, 10, 357. DOI 10.3390/f10040357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

29. Fu, W., Fu, Z., Ge, H., Ji, B., Jiang, P. et al. (2015). Spatial variation of biomass carbon density in a subtropical region of Southeastern China. Forests, 6, 1966–1981. DOI 10.3390/f6061966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

30. Dai, W., Zhao, K., Fu, W., Jiang, P., Li, Y. et al. (2018). Spatial variation of organic carbon density in topsoils of a typical subtropical forest, Southeastern China. Catena, 167, 181–189. DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

31. Dai, W., Fu, W., Jiang, P., Zhao, K., Li, Y. et al. (2018). Spatial pattern of carbon stocks in forest ecosystems of a typical subtropical region of Southeastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 409, 288–297. DOI 10.1016/J.FORECO.2017.11.036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

32. Song, Y. Q., Qiao, C. H., Ma, X. L., Wang, L. C. (2015). Influence of different fertilization methods on growth of Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 35(1), 12–16. DOI 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.01.003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

33. Wu, J., Lin, H., Meng, C., Jiang, P., Fu, W. (2014). Effects of intercropping grasses on soil organic carbon and microbial community functional diversity under Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis sarg.) stands. Soil Research, 52(6), 575–583. DOI 10.1071/SR14021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

34. Wei, N., Li, G., Cai, M., Shi, W., Liu, W. et al. (2021). Effects of slow-release fertilization rates on seedling quality and field survival rates of four exotic oaks. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural), 45(3), 53–60. DOI 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

35. Chen, K., Chen, H., Tseng, C., Tsay, Y. (2020). Improving nitrogen use efficiency by manipulating nitrate remobilization in plants. Nature Plants, 6(9), 1126–1135. DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-00758-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

36. Wang, L. P., Yan, Z. Y., Li, J. Y., Wang, J. H., He, X. et al. (2012). Effects of exponential fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology of Catalpa bungei clones. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(23), 7452–7462. DOI 10.5846/stxb201203040288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

37. Ao, Y., Hirst, P., Li, G., Miao, Y., Zhang, R. (2018). Combined effects of provenance and slow-release fertilizer on nursery and field performance of yellowhorn seedlings. Silva Fennica, 52(5), 10034. DOI 10.14214/sf.10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

38. Boivin, J. R., Miller, B. D., Timmer, V. R. (2002). Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings under greenhouse culture: Biomass and nutrient dynamics. Annals of Forest Science, 59, 255–264. DOI 10.1051/forest:2002021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

39. Timmer, V. R., Munson, A. D. (1991). Site-specific growth and nutrient uptake of planted Picea mariana in the ontario clay belt. IV. nitrogen loading response. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21(7), 1058–1065. DOI 10.1139/x91-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

40. Li, S. X., Yang, Z. J., Xu, D. P., Zhang, N. N., Liu, X. J. (2015). Effects of nitrogen application rate on growth and nutrient accumulation of Santalum album L. seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 21(3), 807–814. DOI 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

41. Wang, H., Jin, J., Fu, W. J., Morrison, L., Lin, H. et al. (2020). Converting evergreen broad-leaved forests into tea and moso bamboo plantations affects labile carbon pools and the chemical composition of soil organic carbon. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 135225. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

42. Einsmann, J., Jones, R., Pu, M., Mitchell, R. (1999). Nutrient foraging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms. Journal of Ecology, 87, 609–619. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00376.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

43. Salifu, K. F., Timmer, V. R. (2003). Nitrogen retraslocation response of young picea mariana to nitrogen-15 supply. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 309–318. DOI 10.2136/sssaj2003.3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

44. Chen, L., Wang, C., Dell, B., Zhao, Z., Guo, J. et al. (2018). Growth and nutrient dynamics of Betula alnoides seedlings under exponential fertilization. Journal of Forestry Research, 29, 111–119. DOI 10.1007/s11676-017-0427-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

images This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.