TY  - EJOU
AU  - Ishiwata, Mai 
AU  - Ishibashi, Kohei 
AU  - Kato, Yoshiaki 
AU  - Sakaguchi, Heima 
AU  - Nakamura, Toshihiro 
AU  - Oka, Satoshi 
AU  - Miyazaki, Yuichiro 
AU  - Wakamiya, Akinori 
AU  - Ueda, Nobuhiko 
AU  - Nakajima, Kenzaburo 
AU  - Kamakura, Tsukasa 
AU  - Wada, Mitsuru 
AU  - Inoue, Yuko 
AU  - Miyamoto, Koji 
AU  - Aiba, Takeshi 
AU  - Takeda, Norihiko 
AU  - Kusano, Kengo 

TI  - Long-Term Outcome of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
T2  - Structural and Congenital Heart Disease

PY  - 2025
VL  - 20
IS  - 3
SN  - 3071-1738

AB  - <b>Background:</b> Ventricular arrhythmia is a common cause of mortality in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). The beneficial effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in patients with ACHD have been demonstrated; however, evidence on this topic remains insufficient. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes after ICD implantation in the ACHD population.<b> Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 35 consecutive patients with ACHD who underwent ICD implantation between December 2012 and August 2022. ICD implantation was classified as primary or secondary prevention. The long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy, and complications related to ICD implantation, were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Among the 35 patients, 18 patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention. During a median follow-up period of 1484 days, 3 patients in the primary prevention group and 1 patient in the secondary prevention group died. The 2- and 5-year all-cause mortality rates were 6.2% and 13.6%, respectively. Two (11.1%) and 4 (23.5%) patients in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively, received appropriate therapy. Six patients (17%) were administered inappropriate therapy, and 2 patients (5.7%) experienced device-related complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in the all-cause mortality or the rates of appropriate and inappropriate therapy between the primary and secondary prevention groups (<i>p</i> = 0.297, <i>p</i> = 0.427, and <i>p</i> = 0.490, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> The incidence of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ACHD was considerably high and comparable to that observed in patients with acquired heart disease, both in primary and secondary prevention. ICD implantation for primary prevention as well as for secondary prevention may be important in patients with ACHD.
KW  - Adult congenital heart diseases; implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; primary prevention

DO  - 10.32604/chd.2025.067716