@Article{sdhm.2026.073282,
AUTHOR = {Caiping Huang, Yulong Mei, Wangyuan Tian, Zihang Yu},
TITLE = {Concrete Bridge Defect Monitoring and Quantitative Identification via U-Net and Mathematical Morphology},
JOURNAL = {Structural Durability \& Health Monitoring},
VOLUME = {},
YEAR = {},
NUMBER = {},
PAGES = {{pages}},
URL = {http://www.techscience.com/sdhm/online/detail/27452},
ISSN = {1930-2991},
ABSTRACT = {Bridge damage detection is critical to bridge maintenance practices. However, traditional inspection methods are plagued by high labour intensity and low operational efficiency. To enhance the intelligence, objectivity, and efficiency of bridge damage detection, this study proposes an automated approach for the identification and quantitative measurement of concrete defects. Specifically, this method adopts the Visual Geometry Group (VGG) network as the backbone of the U-Net architecture to perform semantic segmentation on images containing typical concrete defects, including spalling, cracks, and exposed reinforcement bars. Subsequently, mathematical morphology algorithms are employed to optimise the segmented images, thereby mitigating errors induced by semantic segmentation. Utilising MATLAB software, the area (or length) of concrete defects is quantified by referencing objects with known dimensions. To validate the proposed method, semantic segmentation experiments were conducted on defect images collected from 17 in-service reinforced concrete bridges in Xuchang City, Henan Province. Experimental results indicate that the VGG16-U-Net model not only accurately locates and classifies three common concrete defects under complex background conditions but also enables the quantification of their area or length. The obtained results fully meet the requirements of practical engineering inspections. For the identification of concrete spalling, cracks, and exposed reinforcement, the model achieved a Mean Pixel Accuracy (MPA) of 90.53% and a Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 80.54%. Furthermore, the application of mathematical morphology to optimize segmentation errors further improved the accuracy of defect quantitative calculation, with the optimized absolute error ranging from 0.08% to 0.21%.},
DOI = {10.32604/sdhm.2026.073282}
}