Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

crossmark

Device Discovery in D2D Communication: Scenarios and Challenges

Adeel Iqbal1, Ali Nauman2, Riaz Hussain1, Irfan Latif Khan1, Ali Khaqan1, Sana Shuja1, Sung Won Kim2,*

1 COMSATS University, Islamabad, 45550, Pakistan
2 Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, 38541, Korea

* Corresponding Author: Sung Won Kim. Email: email

Computers, Materials & Continua 2023, 75(1), 1735-1750. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.034468

Abstract

Device to Device (D2D) communication is expected to be an essential part of 5G cellular networks. D2D communication enables close-proximity devices to establish a direct communication session. D2D communication offers many advantages, such as reduced latency, high data rates, range extension, and cellular offloading. The first step to establishing a D2D session is device discovery; an efficient device discovery will lead to efficient D2D communication. D2D device further needs to manage its mode of communication, perform resource allocation, manage its interference and most importantly control its power to improve the battery life of the device. This work has developed six distinct scenarios in which D2D communication can be initiated, considering their merits, demerits, limitations, and optimization parameters. D2D communication procedures for the considered scenarios have been formulated, based upon the signal flow, containing device discovery, resource allocation, and session teardown. Finally, latency for each scenario has been evaluated, based on propagation and processing delays.

Keywords


Cite This Article

A. Iqbal, A. Nauman, R. Hussain, I. L. Khan, A. Khaqan et al., "Device discovery in d2d communication: scenarios and challenges," Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 75, no.1, pp. 1735–1750, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.034468



cc This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 710

    View

  • 600

    Download

  • 1

    Like

Share Link