Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ABSTRACT

Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date

Liu Bingfei, Dui Guansuo, Zhu Yuping

The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences 2011, 17(3), 73-74. https://doi.org/10.3970/icces.2011.017.073

Abstract

Several constitutive models with different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy (SMA) are compared with the experimental date. Different approaches such as upper bound theory and lower bound theory have been adopted and a new correction formula of the yield function is proposed in this work to study the behavior of porous SMAs. Numerical results are compared with the experimental date by Zhao et al (2005). It shows that the researches using upper bound and lower bound are nearly the same and the new correction formula is much closer to the experimental data than others.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Bingfei, L., Guansuo, D., Yuping, Z. (2011). Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date. The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences, 17(3), 73-74. https://doi.org/10.3970/icces.2011.017.073
Vancouver Style
Bingfei L, Guansuo D, Yuping Z. Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date. Int Conf Comput Exp Eng Sciences . 2011;17(3):73-74 https://doi.org/10.3970/icces.2011.017.073
IEEE Style
L. Bingfei, D. Guansuo, and Z. Yuping "Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date," Int. Conf. Comput. Exp. Eng. Sciences , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 73-74. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3970/icces.2011.017.073



cc This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 1077

    View

  • 866

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link