Open Access
ARTICLE
International regional working groups on prostate cancer: results of consensus development
1
Division of Urology, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2
Department of Urology, Laval University, Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Address correspondence to Dr. Laurence H. Klotz, Division
of Urology, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health
Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, # MG 408, Toronto,
Ontario M4N 3M5 Canada
Canadian Journal of Urology 2005, 12(Suppl.1), 86-91.
Abstract
At the first Global Urologic Oncology Congress — which was held in conjunction with the SIU meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii, on October 2-3, 2004 — a total of 250 urologists from nine regions throughout the world participated in working groups to develop consensus statements about the management of prostate cancer patients. The focus was on two areas of prostate cancer: first, screening and detection — including when to do a biopsy, and how to manage low-risk patients — and second, management of high-risk patients.Conclusion: Overall, there is marked global diversity of beliefs about optimal screening and management of patients with low- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. This diversity likely reflects regional differences in epidemiologic factors, resources, and treatment patterns. Participating in the process of trying to develop international practice consensus gives urologists the opportunity to broaden their perspective about handling common clinical scenarios.
Cite This Article
Copyright © 2005 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Download PDF
Downloads
Citation Tools