Open Access
ARTICLE
Current management of small renal masses
Michelle L. Ramírez, Christopher P. Evans
Department of Urology and Cancer Center, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Christopher P. Evans,
Department of Urology, 4860 Y St., Suite 3500, University
of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
95817 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2007, 14(Suppl.6), 39-47.
Abstract
The incidence of small renal masses (< 4 cm) is
increasing due to the widespread use of imaging
studies. Many of these incidental lesions may remain
asymptomatic or in fact be benign, and recent insight
into their natural course has contributed to
modifications in management. With improvements in
biopsy technique and minimally invasive technologies,
appropriate diagnosis and treatment of these masses
are further being evaluated. Other contemporary
approaches, including surveillance, laparoscopic
partial nephrectomy, enucleation, ablative procedures,
and high-intensity focused ultrasound, are weighed
against open nephron-sparing surgery, the current
gold standard for treatment. Here, we review currently
available data on the efficacy of these treatment options.
Additionally, we examine the natural history of small
renal masses, the role of diagnostic biopsy, and follow-up strategies for proper management.
Keywords
renal cell carcinoma, nephron-sparing, nephrectomy, minimally invasive, ablation, diathermy, cryosurgery, enucleation, biopsy
Cite This Article
APA Style
Ramírez, M.L., Evans, C.P. (2007). Current management of small renal masses. Canadian Journal of Urology, 14(Suppl.6), 39–47.
Vancouver Style
Ramírez ML, Evans CP. Current management of small renal masses. Can J Urology. 2007;14(Suppl.6):39–47.
IEEE Style
M.L. Ramírez and C.P. Evans, “Current management of small renal masses,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 14, no. Suppl.6, pp. 39–47, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 The Canadian Journal of Urology.