Open Access
ARTICLE
Hematuria: etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician
Jitesh V. Patel1, Christopher V. Chambers2, Leonard G. Gomella1
1
Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
2
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Leonard G. Gomella,
Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas
Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1112 College
Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2008, 15(Suppl.4), 54-62.
Abstract
Asymptomatic microscopic and gross hematuria are
common problems for the primary care physician. The
exact defi nition of microscopic hematuria is debated,
but is defi ned by one group as > 3 red blood cells/high
power microscopic fi eld. While the causes of hematuria
are extensive, the most common differential diagnosis for
both microscopic and gross hematuria in adults includes
infection, malignancy, and urolithiasis. Clinical
evaluation of these patients often involves urological
consultation with urine cytology, urine culture,
imaging studies, and cystoscopy. Patients who have
no identifi able cause after an extensive workup should
be monitored for early detection of malignancy or occult
renal disease.
Keywords
asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, gross hematuria, primary care
Cite This Article
APA Style
Patel, J.V., Chambers, C.V., Gomella, L.G. (2008). Hematuria: etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician. Canadian Journal of Urology, 15(Suppl.4), 54–62.
Vancouver Style
Patel JV, Chambers CV, Gomella LG. Hematuria: etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician. Can J Urology. 2008;15(Suppl.4):54–62.
IEEE Style
J.V. Patel, C.V. Chambers, and L.G. Gomella, “Hematuria: etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 15, no. Suppl.4, pp. 54–62, 2008.
Copyright © 2008 The Canadian Journal of Urology.