Open Access
ARTICLE
Association of bladder sensation measures and bladder diary in patients with urinary incontinence
1
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
2
Virginia Urology Center for Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Address correspondence Dr. David E. Rapp, 5829 Ascot Glen
Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23059 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2012, 19(2), 6183-6187.
Abstract
Introduction: Investigation suggests the involvement of afferent actions in the pathophysiology of urinary incontinence. Current diagnostic modalities do not allow for the accurate identification of sensory dysfunction. We previously reported urodynamic derivatives that may be useful in assessing bladder sensation. We sought to further investigate these derivatives by assessing for a relationship with 3-day bladder diary.Materials and methods: Subset analysis was performed in patients without stress urinary incontinence (SUI) attempting to isolate patients with urgency symptoms.
Results: No association was demonstrated between bladder diary parameters and urodynamic derivatives (r coefficient range (-0.06 to 0.08)(p > 0.05)). However, subset analysis demonstrated an association between detrusor overactivity (DO) and bladder urgency velocity (BUV), with a lower BUV identified in patients without DO. Subset analysis of patients with isolated urgency/urge incontinence identified weak associations between voiding frequency and FSR (r = 0.39) and between daily incontinence episodes and BUV (r = 0.35). However, these associations failed to demonstrate statistical significance.
Conclusions: No statistical association was seen between bladder diary and urodynamic derivatives. This is not unexpected, given that bladder diary parameters may reflect numerous pathologies including not only sensory dysfunction but also SUI and DO. However, weak associations were identified in patients without SUI and, further, a statistical relationship between DO and BUV was seen. Additional research is needed to assess the utility of FSR/BUV in characterizing sensory dysfunction, especially in patients without concurrent pathology (e.g. SUI, DO).
Keywords
Cite This Article
Copyright © 2012 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Download PDF
Downloads
Citation Tools