Open Access
HOW I DO IT
Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract
Chad P. Hubsher, Robert Jansen, Dale R. Riggs, Barbara J. Jackson, Stanley Zaslau
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Stanley Zaslau, Division of
Urology, Department of Surgery, PO Box 9238, Robert C.
Byrd Health Science Center, West Virginia University,
Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2012, 19(5), 6480-6484.
Abstract
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become a standard
treatment option for patients suffering from urinary urge
incontinence, urgency-frequency, and/or nonobstructive
urinary retention refractory to conservative and
pharmacologic treatment. Since its initial development,
the manufacturer of InterStim therapy (Medtronic,
Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), has introduced technical
modifications, while surgeons and researchers have adapted
and published various innovations and alterations of the
implantation technique. In this article, we feature our
SNM technique including patient selection, comprehensive
dialogue/evaluation, procedure details, and appropriate
follow up. Although there is often great variability in
patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction, we maintain
that great success can be achieved with a systematic and
methodical approach to SNM.
Keywords
neuromodulation, sacral nerve, voiding dysfunction
Cite This Article
APA Style
Hubsher, C.P., Jansen, R., Riggs, D.R., Jackson, B.J., Zaslau, S. (2012). Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Canadian Journal of Urology, 19(5), 6480–6484.
Vancouver Style
Hubsher CP, Jansen R, Riggs DR, Jackson BJ, Zaslau S. Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Can J Urology. 2012;19(5):6480–6484.
IEEE Style
C.P. Hubsher, R. Jansen, D.R. Riggs, B.J. Jackson, and S. Zaslau, “Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 6480–6484, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Journal of Urology.