Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Effect of metastatic site on emergency department disposition in men with metastatic prostate cancer

Jesse D. Sammon1,2,*, Bartosz F. Kaczmarek1,2,*, Praful Ravi1, Maxine Sun3, Florian Roghmann3, Shyam Sukumar1,2, Khurshid Ghani1,2, Pranav Sharma1,2, Pierre I. Karakiewicz3, James O. Peabody1, Jack S. Elder1, Mani Menon1, Quoc-Dien Trinh1,2,4

1 Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
2 VUI Center for Outcomes Research Analytics & Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
3 Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
4 Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Jesse D. Sammon, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W. Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2013, 20(6), 7008-7014.

Abstract

Introduction: Though the prevalence of metastatic prostate cancer is decreasing, the rate of admission from the emergency department (ED) is increasing. Little is known about the implications of metastatic site on a patient's ED course and admission.
Materials and methods: A weighted estimate of 15,367 patients with metastatic prostate cancer who presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 was abstracted from the United States Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Descriptive statistics were used to elaborate patient and hospital characteristics of the metastatic prostate cancer population and logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors of admission.
Results: The most common site of metastasis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer presenting to the ED was bone (80.6%), followed by liver (13.2%), lung (9.3%) and other genitourinary sites (8.1%). Over the study period, there was an increase in prevalence of the four commonest metastatic sites, and admission rates varied between metastatic sites (83.2% for bone to 95.2% for nodal metastasis). Substantial variability in the rate of inpatient mortality was noted. Increasing age, Northeast region, increased comorbidity burden, and the presence of nodal metastases and other urinary metastases were shown to be independent predictors of hospital admission.
Conclusions: The commonest metastatic site in patients presenting to United States EDs with metastatic prostate cancer between 2006 and 2009 was bone. Patients presenting with nodal metastases were most likely to be admitted. Independent predictors of hospitalization included age, Northeast region, increased comorbidities, nodal metastases and other urinary metastases.

Keywords

prostate cancer, metastasis, emergency department, admission disposition

Cite This Article

APA Style
Sammon, J.D., Kaczmarek, B.F., Ravi, P., Sun, M., Roghmann, F. et al. (2013). Effect of metastatic site on emergency department disposition in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Canadian Journal of Urology, 20(6), 7008–7014.
Vancouver Style
Sammon JD, Kaczmarek BF, Ravi P, Sun M, Roghmann F, Sukumar S, et al. Effect of metastatic site on emergency department disposition in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Can J Urology. 2013;20(6):7008–7014.
IEEE Style
J.D. Sammon et al., “Effect of metastatic site on emergency department disposition in men with metastatic prostate cancer,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 7008–7014, 2013.



cc Copyright © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 150

    View

  • 127

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link