Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard?

Guido Giusti1, Silvia Proietti1, Lorenzo G. Luciani2, Roberto Peschechera1, Antonella Giannantoni3, Gianluigi Taverna1, Giuseppe Sortino1,4, Pierpaolo Graziotti1

1 Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
2 Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
3 Department of Urology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
4 Department of Urology, G. Rodolico Hospital, Catania, Italy
Address correspondence to Dr. Silvia Proietti, Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinicaland Research Center, Via Manzoni, 56, 20089, Milan, Italy

Canadian Journal of Urology 2014, 21(2), 7207-7212.

Abstract

Introduction: Major kidney stones have traditionally been treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), which until a few years ago was considered inappropriate for this purpose, is becoming a viable, attractive alternative. The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RIRS combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of stones >2 cm in diameter in a large series of patients, reporting complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Materials and methods: By retrospective analysis, we identified a total of 162 patients who were affected by stones greater than 2 cm in diameter and who had undergone RIRS. We reviewed demographic and stone characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and complications.
Results: The mean stone size was 2.7 cm ± 0.6 cm. The primary, secondary, and tertiary stone-free rates were 66%, 80.9%, and 87.7%, respectively. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.48. The complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were Clavien I in 20.4% of patients, Clavien II in 0%, Clavien III in 4.9%, Clavien IV in 0.6%, and Clavien V in 0%.
Conclusions: As an alternative to standard procedures for the treatment of renal calculi greater than 2 cm in diameter, RIRS is safe and effective, with a low complication rate.

Keywords

renal stones, endourology, flexible ureteroscopy, complications

Cite This Article

APA Style
Giusti, G., Proietti, S., Luciani, L.G., Peschechera, R., Giannantoni, A. et al. (2014). Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? . Canadian Journal of Urology, 21(2), 7207–7212.
Vancouver Style
Giusti G, Proietti S, Luciani LG, Peschechera R, Giannantoni A, Taverna G, et al. Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? . Can J Urology. 2014;21(2):7207–7212.
IEEE Style
G. Giusti et al., “Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? ,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 7207–7212, 2014.



cc Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 124

    View

  • 128

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link