Open Access
RESIDENT’S CORNER
Ureteral obstruction following partial nephrectomy: can it be caused by fibrin glue?
Timothy D. Lyon, Katherine M. Theisen, Kevin J. Rycyna,
Ronald M. Benoit
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Timothy D. Lyon, Department
of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471
Fifth Avenue, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2015, 22(1), 7674-7676.
Abstract
Fibrin sealants are widely used during partial nephrectomy,
however reports regarding the potential complications
associated with their use are limited. We present the case of a
67-year-old male who developed delayed ureteral obstruction
without hydronephrosis following partial nephrectomy
in a solitary kidney. We hypothesize that the obstruction
and absence of hydronephrosis were caused by extrinsic
compression and subsequent inflammation due to the fibrin
glue. Our report underscores the importance of a high index
of suspicion for obstruction when acute kidney injury occurs
following partial nephrectomy when fibrin glue is used, even
in the absence of collecting system dilatation.
Keywords
partial nephrectomy, fibrin tissue adhesive, ureteral obstruction
Cite This Article
APA Style
Lyon, T.D., Theisen, K.M., Rycyna, K.J., Benoit, R.M. (2015). Ureteral obstruction following partial nephrectomy: can it be caused by fibrin glue?. Canadian Journal of Urology, 22(1), 7674–7676.
Vancouver Style
Lyon TD, Theisen KM, Rycyna KJ, Benoit RM. Ureteral obstruction following partial nephrectomy: can it be caused by fibrin glue?. Can J Urology. 2015;22(1):7674–7676.
IEEE Style
T.D. Lyon, K.M. Theisen, K.J. Rycyna, and R.M. Benoit, “Ureteral obstruction following partial nephrectomy: can it be caused by fibrin glue?,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 7674–7676, 2015.
Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Journal of Urology.