Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Shortened operative time for pediatric robotic versus laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty

Ashay Patel1,2, Mark W. Pickhardt3, Nathan Littlejohn2, Ismael Zamilpa1,2, Mallikarjuna Rettiganti4, Chunqiao Luo4, Stephen Canon1,2

1 Division of Pediatric Urology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
2 Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
3 College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
4 Department of Pediatrics, Biostatistics Program, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Ashay Patel, Division of Pediatric Urology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 1 Children’s Way, Slot 840, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2016, 23(3), 8308.

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is increasingly becoming the standard procedure for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in the pediatric population, but few studies have shown a clear advantage over the more technically demanding laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in children. The objective was to study the patients treated with RALP or LP at our institution and the associated outcomes for each minimally invasive approach for the correction of UPJO.
Materials and methods: Our laparoscopic and robotic database was queried to identify all patients with a history of primary robotic-assisted or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for the correction of UPJO performed at our institution from January 2010 through November 2013 and were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed age, surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay length, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Results: Seventy-three total patients were identified as having RALP or LP during this time period with five patients excluded from the analysis. We identified 55 patients with RALP and 13 patients with LP. No differences in success rate or postoperative complications were found for the two cohorts. The length of procedure was significantly shorter for the RALP group compared to the LP group.

Keywords

pediatric population, robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Cite This Article

APA Style
Patel, A., Pickhardt, M.W., Littlejohn, N., Zamilpa, I., Rettiganti, M. et al. (2016). Shortened operative time for pediatric robotic versus laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Canadian Journal of Urology, 23(3).
Vancouver Style
Patel A, Pickhardt MW, Littlejohn N, Zamilpa I, Rettiganti M, Luo C, et al. Shortened operative time for pediatric robotic versus laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Can J Urology. 2016;23(3).
IEEE Style
A. Patel et al., “Shortened operative time for pediatric robotic versus laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 23, no. 3, 2016.



cc Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 137

    View

  • 145

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link