Open Access
RESIDENT’S CORNER
“Pseudo” pseudoaneurysm following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy
Eric Schommer, Julio Gundian, David D. Thiel
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. David D. Thiel, Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2017, 24(2), 8773-8775.
Abstract
A65-year-old female presented to clinic requesting follow up for a history of right robotic partial nephrectomy done at an outside institution 2 years prior. Initial pathology demonstrated a grade 2/4 3.4 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma with negative margins. There was no tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion. High quality follow up imaging initially revealed a pseudoaneurysm in the central portion of the right kidney. The patient was sent to interventional radiology for angioembolization. Angiography identifed the abnormality to be a recurrent or residual mass in the renal hilum. MRI confrmed these fndings, and the patient ultimately required a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for defnitive treatment. Final pathology showed grade 2/4 clear cell renal cell carcinoma with negative margins and no tumor necrosis or sarcomatoid differentiation. The tumor did involve sinus fat and sinus vessels, but not perinephric fat.
Keywords
arteriovenous fstula, kidney, renal cell carcinoma, pseudoaneurysm, laparoscopic surgery
Cite This Article
APA Style
Schommer, E., Gundian, J., Thiel, D.D. (2017). “Pseudo” pseudoaneurysm following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology, 24(2), 8773–8775.
Vancouver Style
Schommer E, Gundian J, Thiel DD. “Pseudo” pseudoaneurysm following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Can J Urology. 2017;24(2):8773–8775.
IEEE Style
E. Schommer, J. Gundian, and D.D. Thiel, ““Pseudo” pseudoaneurysm following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 8773–8775, 2017.
Copyright © 2017 The Canadian Journal of Urology.