Open Access
ARTICLE
Primary malignancies of the epididymis: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors
1 Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
Address correspondence to Hriday P. Bhambhvani,
Department of Urology, Stanford University School of
Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2021, 28(1), 10522-10529.
Abstract
Introduction: We sought to describe clinical characteristics and identify prognostic factors among patients with primary malignancies of the epididymis (PMEs).Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2015) was queried to identify patients with PME. Descriptive statistics and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used.
Results: Eighty-nine patients with PME were identified. Median age was 57 years (5-85), and median overall survival (OS) was 16.8 years. The most commonly represented histologies were rhabdomyosarcoma (19.1%), B-cell lymphoma (16.9%), leiomyosarcoma (16.9%), and liposarcoma (12.4%). In multivariable analysis, tumor size ≥ 4 cm was associated with worse OS (HR = 4.46, p = 0.01) compared to tumors < 4 cm. Patients with nonsarcomatoid histology had OS similar to patients with sarcomatoid histology (HR = 0.95, p = 0.92). Disease with regional invasion (HR = 5.19, p = 0.007) and distant metastasis (HR = 29.80, p = 0.0002) had worse OS compared to localized disease. Receipt of radiotherapy was associated with enhanced OS (HR = 0.10, p = 0.006), whereas receipt of chemotherapy was not associated with OS.
Conclusions: We describe the largest cohort of PMEs to date. Larger lesions and tumor stage were independently associated with poor overall survival, while receipt of radiotherapy was associated with enhanced overall survival.
Keywords
Cite This Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.