Open Access

ARTICLE

Grant funding among underrepresented minority and women urologists at academic institutions

Simon White¹, David Tella¹, Bahrom Ostad¹, David Barquin², Caleigh Smith¹,Rebecca King³, Kirsten L. Greene¹, Tracy Downs¹, Nora G. Kern¹

1 Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
2 Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
3 School of Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
Address correspondence to Simon White, PO Box 800422, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2024, 31(1), 11777-11783.

Abstract

Introduction: Grant funding to Urology has decreased over the last decade. Documented lack of gender and race diversity at the faculty level raises concerns for funding disparities. This study sought to characterize disparities based upon race and gender in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data to Urologic faculty.
Methods and materials: Data from 145 ACGME accredited Urology residency programs incorporating faculty gender and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status was utilized. The NIH Research Portfolio Online Report Tool was queried between 1985 and 2023 for grants related to current Urology faculty. URiM status, gender, years of practice, academic rank, and Doximity residency program rank were factors in multivariable analysis.
Results: A total of 2,131 faculty were included. Three hundred one Urologists received 793 urologic grants for a total of $993,919,052 in funding. By race, grants were awarded to: White 72.9%, Asian 21.8%, Hispanic 3.0%, Black 2.1%. Men received 708 grants (89.3%) worth $917,083,475 total. Women received 85 grants (10.7%) worth $76,835,577 total. Likelihood of being awarded a grant was significantly associated with non-URiM status (p < 0.001) and men (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, Doximity rank (p < 0.001) and academic rank (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of receiving a grant; male gender, URiM status, and years of practice were not. Academic rank was also a significant predictor of number of grants received (p = 0.04) and total funding (p = 0.04); years of practice, Doximity rank, URiM status, and gender were not.
Conclusions: NIH grants were more likely awarded to higher ranked faculty from higher Doximity ranked institutions with no differences based on URiM status or gender.

---

Keywords

---