Open Access

ARTICLE

Urban Transportation Strategy Selection for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy N-Bipolar Soft Expert Sets

Sagvan Y. Musa^1,2, Zanyar A. Ameen^3,*, Wafa Alagal⁴, Baravan A. Asaad^5,6

1 Department of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Zakho, Zakho, 42002, Iraq
2 Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Knowledge University, Kirkuk Road, Erbil, 44001, Iraq
3 Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Duhok, Duhok, 42001, Iraq
4 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, 23445, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, 42002, Iraq
6 Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Cihan University-Duhok, Duhok, 42001, Iraq

* Corresponding Author: Zanyar A. Ameen. Email:

(This article belongs to the Special Issue: Algorithms, Models, and Applications of Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making)

Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 2025, 144(3), 3493-3529. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.070019

Received 06 July 2025; Accepted 19 August 2025; Issue published 30 September 2025

Abstract

Urban transportation planning involves evaluating multiple conflicting criteria such as accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and environmental impact, often under uncertainty and incomplete information. These complex decisions require input from various stakeholders, including planners, policymakers, engineers, and community representatives, whose opinions may differ or contradict. Traditional decision-making approaches struggle to effectively handle such bipolar and multivalued expert evaluations. To address these challenges, we propose a novel decision-making framework based on Pythagorean fuzzy N-bipolar soft expert sets. This model allows experts to express both positive and negative opinions on a multinary scale, capturing nuanced judgments with higher accuracy. It introduces algebraic operations and a structured aggregation algorithm to systematically integrate and resolve conflicting expert inputs. Applied to a real-world case study, the framework evaluated five urban transport strategies based on key criteria, producing final scores as follows: improving public transit (−0.70), optimizing traffic signal timing (1.86), enhancing pedestrian infrastructure (3.10), expanding bike lanes (0.59), and implementing congestion pricing (0.77). The results clearly identify enhancing pedestrian infrastructure as the most suitable option, having obtained the highest final score of 3.10. Comparative analysis demonstrates the framework’s superior capability in modeling expert consensus, managing uncertainty, and supporting transparent multi-criteria group decision-making.

---

Keywords

---