Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Innovative Numerical Methods for Nonlinear MEMS: the Non-Incremental FEM vs. the Discrete Geometric Approach

P. Bettini, E. Brusa, M. Munteanu, R. Specogna, F. Trevisan1

Dept. Electrical, Management and Mechanical Eng. (DIEGM) and Lab. Ubiquita and Pervasive Technologies (Tech-Up), Università di Udine, Udine, Italy

Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 2008, 33(3), 215-242. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2008.033.215

Abstract

Electrostatic microactuator is a paradigm of MEMS. Cantilever and double clamped microbeams are often used in microswitches, microresonators and varactors. An efficient numerical prediction of their mechanical behaviour is affected by the nonlinearity of the electromechanical coupling. Sometimes an additional nonlinearity is due to the large displacement or to the axial-flexural coupling exhibited in bending. To overcome the computational limits of the available numerical methods two new formulations are here proposed and compared. Modifying the classical beam element in the Finite Element Method to allow the implementation of a \emph {Non incremental sequential approach} is firstly proposed. The so-called \emph {Discrete Geometric Approach (DGA)}, already successfully used in the numerical analysis of electromagnetic problems, is then applied. These two methods are here formulated, for the first time, in the case of strongly nonlinear electromechanical coupling. Numerical investigations are performed to find the pull-in of microbeam actuators experimentally tested. The non incremental approach is implemented by discretizing both the structure and the dielectric region by means of the FEM, then by meshing the electric domain by the Boundary Element Method (BEM). A preliminary experimental validation is finally presented in the case of planar microcantilever actuators.

Keywords


Cite This Article

Bettini, P., Brusa, E., Munteanu, M., Specogna, R., Trevisan, F. (2008). Innovative Numerical Methods for Nonlinear MEMS: the Non-Incremental FEM vs. the Discrete Geometric Approach. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 33(3), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2008.033.215



cc This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 1201

    View

  • 935

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link