Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Preoperative echocardiographic measures in interrupted aortic arch: Which ones best predict surgical approach and outcome?

Ginnie Abarbanell1, William L. Border2, Brian Schlosser2, Gemma Morrow2, Michael Kelleman2, Ritu Sachdeva2

1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
2 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Sibley Heart Center Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

* Corresponding Author: Ginnie Abarbanell, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine/ St. Louis Children’s Hospital, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8116, St. Louis, MO 63110. Email: email

Congenital Heart Disease 2018, 13(3), 476-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12599

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear whether neonates with interrupted aortic arch (IAA) and a smaller left ventricular outflow tract may have improved outcomes with a Yasui operation (ventricular outflow bypass procedure) over a primary complete repair. This study sought to identify preoperative echocardiographic parameters to differentiate which neonates may have improved outcomes with a primary vs Yasui operation.
Design: Patient demographics, cardiac surgery type, complications, need for reoperation and/or interventional catheterization, and date of last follow-up were collected on neonates who underwent a biventricular repair for IAA from 2003 to 2014. Preoperative echocardiograms were analyzed for: IAA type, valve annulus size, aortic valve morphology, ventricular size and aortic arch anatomy.
Results: Seventy-seven neonates underwent IAA repair between 2003 and 2013. 60 neonates had a primary repair and 17 a Yasui operation. Neonates that underwent a Yasui operation had significantly smaller mitral and aortic valves with aortic arch hypoplasia. Within the primary repair group, a decreasing aortic root z-score on univariate analysis increased the odds of reoperation by twofold [OR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.15-3.42), P = .014]. A significant interaction between repair type and aortic root z-score was identified on multivariable analysis (P = .039), for neonates with aortic root z-scores less than -2.5, the probability of reoperation during the follow up time period [mean 4.5 years (3.3 months-10 year)] was significantly higher in the primary repair group compared to the Yasui group (64.3% vs 37.5%).
Conclusions: Neonates with IAA and an aortic root z-score less than -2.5 have lower odds of subsequent reoperations with a Yasui operation compared to a primary repair over the follow up period. These findings suggest a Yasui operation should be considered if the preoperative aortic root z-score is less than -2.5. Careful evaluation of these morphologic predictors on preoperative echocardiograms can be helpful in surgical planning in neonates with IAA.

Keywords


Cite This Article

Abarbanell, G., Border, W. L., Schlosser, B., Morrow, G., Kelleman, M. et al. (2018). Preoperative echocardiographic measures in interrupted aortic arch: Which ones best predict surgical approach and outcome?. Congenital Heart Disease, 13(3), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12599



cc This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 1040

    View

  • 806

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link