Teacher work values, motivation, and job satisfaction: Mediation professional development engagement

Introduction

Teachers’ motivation and their perceptions of work value and policy orientation are strongly related to educational development. For instance, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation explain their subjective assessment of how much their views and opinions are valued (OECD, 2018). Teachers motivation to teach explains their job satisfaction (Fray & Gore, 2018; Tirana et al., 2023). Conceivably, teachers’ motivation and their perception of value and policy orientations factor into their job satisfaction. This could be amplified through their engagement in professional development (PD) activities. There are few studies that have examined the role of teachers’ PD activities in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation and their motivation and job satisfaction.

Teachers’ perception of values and policy orientations, and their job satisfaction

Teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation refer to their subjective assessment of how much their views and opinions are valued (OECD, 2018). Numerous studies have found that teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation are positively related to their job satisfaction. For example, employing the South African sample from TALIS 2018, one study found that teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation were positively related to their job satisfaction (Oduro et al., 2024). Employing Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) with samples from the U.S., Australia, Finland, and South Korea in TALIS 2018, another study found that teachers who felt undervalued showed lower job satisfaction (Akiba et al., 2023). This empirical finding regarding teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation is supported by evidence from teaching practices. Based on a sample of U.S. K-12 teachers, a further study found that increasing opportunities for teacher decision-making contributed to higher job satisfaction (Ingersoll, 2003). Additionally, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation are positively correlated with engagement in PD activities. For example, employing U.S. data from TALIS 2018 and a series of advanced statistical methods (e.g., machine learning techniques), one study found that when teachers perceived their views were valued by policymakers and the media, they had a more positive attitude toward PD experiences (Yoon & Kim, 2023).

Mediating effect of professional engagement

Teacher PD activity engagement refers to teachers’ participation in activities designed to enhance their professional skills and competencies (Kennedy, 2016). However, not all teachers hold positive attitudes toward teacher PD due to various reasons (Geldenhuys & Oosthuizen, 2015). Some teachers regarded participating in PD activities merely as an obligatory training that wasted time or a task aimed at achieving career promotion, rather than an opportunity to improve skills (Damianidou, 2024). These teachers usually show strong reluctance to engage in PD activities. In theory, these teachers are much more likely to be extrinsically motivated or altruistically motivated.

Teacher extrinsic motivation to teach refers to a psychological state driven by the pursuit of job-related external rewards (Tang et al., 2015), including favorable working conditions, competitive salaries, and career advancement opportunities (Fray & Gore, 2018). Some studies have found that teacher extrinsic motivation is positively correlated with job satisfaction. For example, one study found that teacher extrinsic motivation was positively related to job satisfaction in Pakistan (Nadim et al., 2012). Using a sample of over 700 Albanian secondary teachers, another study found that external motivation was positively correlated with job satisfaction (Tirana et al., 2023). Drawing upon a sample of 133 K-12 teachers in Lebanon, a further study found that extrinsic factors were correlated with teacher job satisfaction (Baroudi et al., 2022).

Teacher altruistic motivation (or social utility motivation) to teach is connected with altruistic fulfillment and altruistic reasons for teaching (Fray & Gore, 2018), including helping students, serving others, and contributing to society (Tang et al., 2015). Many studies have found that teacher altruistic motivation is positively correlated with job satisfaction. For instance, one study found that teacher altruistic motivation was more associated with job satisfaction than extrinsic motivation was (Nadim et al., 2012). A separate piece of research revealed that job satisfaction among teachers is more strongly linked to altruistic motivation than to external motivation (Tirana et al., 2023). Based on a sample of 300 teachers in Pakistan, another study confirmed a positive correlation between altruistic motivation and job satisfaction (Shah et al., 2012). A substantial body of research indicates a positive relationship between teachers’ altruistic motivation and their engagement in PD. For example, using a sample of grades 5–9 math teachers in the US, one study found that teachers who aimed to help students improve test scores, master math content, or understand student thinking, were more likely to engage in PD (Caddle et al., 2016). Another study, applying advanced statistical methods (e.g., LASSO) to the U.S. TALIS 2018 data, found that teachers with altruistic teaching motivation held more positive attitudes toward PD activities (Yoon & Kim, 2023).

Numerous studies have found that teacher PD is positively associated with job satisfaction. For instance, using HLM with a sample from 24 European countries in TALIS 2018, one study revealed that teacher PD had a strong positive correlation with job satisfaction (Smet, 2022). Based on a US sample, another study found that PD quality was positively associated with teacher job satisfaction (Kang & Mavrogordato, 2023). Regarding PD engagement, a further study found that highly participatory teachers showed higher job satisfaction than their less participatory teachers (Yoon & Kim, 2022).

Theoretical foundations

This study was guided by Schwartz’s human values framework (Schwartz, 1992). Human values mainly include self-transcendence values and self-enhancement values (Cable & Edwards, 2004). Self-transcendence values emphasize contributing to society and maintaining close relationships with others. Self-enhancement values emphasize achieving high salary, job security, and prestige. Individuals with self-transcendence values typically make decisions driven by altruistic motivation. Individuals with self-enhancement values typically make decisions driven by extrinsic motivation. This conceptual framework applies not only to decision-making, including teacher PD engagement (Bigsby & Firestone, 2017) and factors influencing the choice of teaching (Giersch, 2016; Wang & Klassen, 2023), but also to the determinants of job satisfaction (Chang & Sung, 2024; Ma & Marion, 2025). Additionally, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation stem from teachers’ desire and expectation to make contributions to the society. Thus, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation can reflect their underlying self-transcendence values. Schwartz’s human values framework provides a conceptual grounding for our study.

The China context

From a global perspective, teaching is a public service calling that requires dedication and a deep concern for students. However, the choice to enter the teaching profession is not solely motivated by a love for it. Common motivations for entering the teaching profession include extrinsic motivation, a love of teaching (intrinsic motivation), and a belief in contributing to society (altruistic motivation). Additionally, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation could be another reason to choose to become a teacher. Intrinsic and altruistic motivations are among the most common reasons for entering the teaching profession in countries and regions outside China (Fray & Gore, 2018). In China, there are more than 15.8 million basic education teachers (MOE, 2024), and 93.1% of in-service teachers are those for whom teaching was their first job (OECD, 2025). However, the proportion of teachers who have intrinsic and altruistic motivation for teaching remains relatively low. This is corroborated by the fact that since the 2000s, the Chinese government has issued a series of policies, such as the Targeted Teacher Training Plan, National Program to Cultivate Excellent Primary and Secondary School Teachers, and the Free Education for Future program to attract college graduates to the teaching profession by providing extrinsic incentives (Guo, 2024).

Goals of the study

This study investigated the mediating role of teachers’ PD activities in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation and their motivation and job satisfaction. Specifically, we propose the following hypothesis:

H1: Teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation were positively associated with job satisfaction.

H2: Teachers with higher PD engagement and work motivation were associated with higher job satisfaction.

Method

Participants and setting

The study sample comprised 2269 females (74.47%) and 778 males (25.53%) (see Table 1). The sample included 796 rural junior school teachers (26.12%) and 2251 urban junior school teachers (73.88%). More than 98% of teachers have a bachelor’s degree. The teaching experience of the participants was categorized into four groups: 5 years or less (17.13%), 6–10 years (15.65%), 11–20 years (32.42%), and more than 20 years (34.78%). The total sample consisted of 2560 public school teachers (84.02%), and 487 private school teachers (15.98%).

Measures

Teacher job satisfaction

The Teacher Job Satisfaction Scale (OECD, 2018) consists of 10 items organized into three subscales. The first subscale, job satisfaction with work environment, contains four items (e.g., “I would like to change to another school if that was possible”). The second, professional fulfillment, includes three items (e.g., “the advantages of being a teacher clearly outweigh the disadvantages”). The third, class autonomy, comprises three items (e.g., “determining course content”). The reliability of the full scale, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.860.

Teacher motivation to teach

The Teacher Motivation to Teach Scale (OECD, 2018) comprises seven items, which are divided into two subscales. The first is extrinsic motivation, measured by four items (e.g., “teaching offered a steady career path”). The second is altruistic motivation, assessed with three items (e.g., “teaching allowed me to influence the development of children and young people”). Internal consistency reliability for the two subscales was 0.847 and 0.838, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha.

Teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation

Comprising three items, the Teachers’ Perceptions of Value and Policy Orientation Scale (OECD, 2018) employs a four-point Likert response format, where 1 indicates “not important at all” and 4 indicates “of high importance” (OECD, 2018). The scale contains items such as “Teachers’ views are valued by policymakers in this country/region.” The reliability of these three items, indicated by a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, was 0.882.

Teachers engagement in PD activities

The scale used to measure teachers’ engagement in PD activities contains 5 items (OECD, 2018). Respondents indicated whether they had engaged in various professional development activities, including attending in-person courses or seminars, participating in education conferences, conducting observation visits to other schools, engaging in formal peer or self-observation and coaching, and joining teacher networks focused on PD. The reliability of these five items, indicated by a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, was 0.709.

Control variables

The covariates considered in this paper were teachers’ gender (1 = female, 0 = male), years of schooling (1 = college, 2 = bachelor’s, 3 = master’s, 4 = Ph.D.), teaching experience, school location (1 = rural, 0 = urban), and school type (1 = public, 0 = non-public).

Procedure

As the data utilized in this research are openly accessible via the OECD survey website (https://survey.oecd.org/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=581415&lang=en), an ethical review was not required.

Data analysis

SEM analysis was conducted to shed light on the complex links between teachers’ perceived value and policy orientation, their motivation, engagement in PD, and overall job satisfaction. Given the dichotomous nature of the mediating variables, this study employed a structural equation model (SEM) based on a Probit framework. The model parameters were estimated using the Weighted Least Squares Mean and Variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator. We performed a path analysis and generated 5000 bootstrap samples to derive the 95% confidence intervals for the parameter estimates. Stata 17.0 was employed for data cleaning, while Mplus 8.3 was used for the main data analysis in this study (Muthén & Muthén, 2017).

Results

Testing for common methods bias

This paper used the Unmeasured Latent Method Construct (ULMC) approach to test for common method bias. A significant common method bias was considered present if the model fit improved substantially after adding a common method factor, specifically if there was an increase in CFI and TLI of more than 0.1 and a decrease in RMSEA of more than 0.05 (Chin et al., 2012). The results of the common method bias were presented in Table 2. Results suggested that RMSEA decreased by 0.003, CFI increased by 0.012, TLI increased by 0.011. The increase in fit indices did not exceed 0.1, and the decrease in fit indices did not exceed 0.05. Thus, common method bias was not found in this study.

Reliability and validity

Drawing on Schwartz’s human values framework, this study employed SEMs to test the hypothesized relationships between teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation, motivation, PD engagement, and job satisfaction. The fit statistics for the model, reported in Table 3, all fell within acceptable ranges: χ²/df = 4.278, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.926, RMSEA = 0.033, and SRMR = 0.048. The model yielded satisfactory fit indices across all measures examined (Muthén & Muthén, 2017).

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

The descriptive statistics and intercorrelations among the main variables are presented in Table 4. Teacher job satisfaction exhibited significant positive correlations with all key variables: extrinsic motivation (r = 0.249, p < 0.001), altruistic motivation (r = 0.319, p < 0.001), teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation (r = 0.436, p < 0.001), and professional development (r = 0.203, p < 0.001). Teacher PD demonstrated significant positive correlations with altruistic motivation (r = 0.162, p < 0.001) and teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation (r = 0.116, p < 0.001).

Hypothesis testing

Figure 1 illustrates the standardized path coefficients of the SEM analysis. Except for the path from teacher extrinsic motivation to teacher PD activities, which was not significant (p > 0.05), all other paths were significant at the 99% confidence level.

Figure 1: SEM path results. Notes. ***p < 0.001. All path coefficients are standardized. Covariates are controlled for.

First, according to the structural model, teacher altruistic motivation and teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation were positively and significantly associated with teacher engagement in PD activities. The path coefficient for teacher altruistic motivation on PD engagement was 0.181 (p < 0.001), and that for teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation on PD engagement was 0.116 (p < 0.001). Obviously, teacher extrinsic motivation showed a stronger correlation with PD engagement than did teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation. Second, engagement in PD activities was positively correlated with teacher job satisfaction (β = 0.164, p < 0.001).

Third, teacher extrinsic motivation demonstrated no significant association with PD engagement, with a nonsignificant path coefficient of 0.009 (p > 0.05). Overall, the results indicate that the H1 was supported, while H2 was partially supported. These questions remain to be examined: whether the mediating effects of teacher PD activities exist, and if so, to what extent.

Teachers’ perception of values and policy orientation and job satisfaction

The outcomes of the bootstrap method for mediation effects are summarized in Table 5. The path coefficient from teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation to job satisfaction was 0.492 (95% CI = [0.450, 0.532], p < 0.001), indicating a significant total effect. Of this total effect, the direct pathway accounted for 0.473 (95% CI = [0.431, 0.514], p < 0.001), and the indirect effect via mediators was 0.019 (95% CI = [0.009, 0.031], p < 0.001). The significance of both effects was confirmed by their 95% confidence intervals, which did not contain zero. Therefore, the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation and job satisfaction was transmitted via teachers’ participation in PD activities. These findings provide support for H1.

PD engagement mediation

The total effect of teacher extrinsic motivation on job satisfaction was statistically significant, with an estimate of 0.116 (95% CI = [0.066, 0.167], p < 0.001).

The direct effect was 0.115 (95% CI = [0.065, 0.167], p < 0.001), while the indirect effect was 0.001 (95% CI = [−0.010, 0.013], p > 0.05), indicating that the indirect effect was not statistically significant. These results imply that the relationship between extrinsic motivation and job satisfaction was not transmitted through PD engagement.

The path coefficient from altruistic motivation to job satisfaction was 0.182 (95% CI = [0.132, 0.234], p < 0.001), indicating a significant total effect. The analysis yielded a significant direct effect of 0.153 (95% CI = [0.102, 0.204], p < 0.001) and a significant indirect effect of 0.030 (95% CI = [0.017, 0.045], p < 0.001). The 95% confidence intervals for both effects were entirely above zero, indicating that the direct and indirect effects were both significant. These findings support the mediating role of teacher PD activities in the altruistic motivation-job satisfaction relationship. H2 was therefore partially upheld by the findings.

Discussion

Teachers’ perception of values and policy orientation and job satisfaction

Teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation were positively related to job satisfaction. This was consistent with existing studies (Akiba et al., 2023; Oduro et al., 2024) and supported H1. One possible explanation is as follows: when teachers’ perspectives are emphasized by policymakers and media, their professional needs are much more likely to be addressed by school leadership. This undoubtedly increases their job satisfaction (Akiba et al., 2023; Oduro et al., 2024). With the improvement in teachers’ status in China, their opinions or views are increasingly valued by policymakers and school stakeholders (VarkeyFoundation, 2019). Then, education policy that incorporates teachers’ views is more likely to gain their support. Meanwhile, teachers develop feelings of fulfillment and accomplishment through engagement in education policy-making. When the valuing of teachers’ views become a widely recognized societal norm, they perceive their voices as receiving media and policy attention. These teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation were related to job satisfaction.

PD engagement mediation

Engagement in PD activities mediated the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation and job satisfaction. This finding supported H2. One possible explanation is as follows: By participating in PD activities, teachers can network with more experts and teachers. This undoubtedly broadens participants’ horizons and helps them understand trends and changes in education policy (Postholm, 2012). This new knowledge can help teachers provide more effective and widely-accepted suggestions to policymakers. Accordingly, these suggestions—based on policy requirements and teachers’ actual needs—are much more likely to be adopted by decision-makers. Once the suggestions are adopted, teachers’ sense of fulfillment naturally leads to greater job satisfaction. In this regard, PD activities partially mediate the relationship between teachers’ perception of value and policy orientation and job satisfaction.

Engagement in PD activities mediated the relationship between altruistic motivation and job satisfaction. Moreover, the indirect effect of altruistic motivation on job satisfaction was larger than that of teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation. This finding not only supported H2 but also aligned with Schwartz’s human values framework. The theory posits that individuals with self-transcendence values emphasize their societal value and contributions, which demonstrates a strong altruistic incentive. Contributing to society and helping others benefit from their actions are among the main sources of job satisfaction. Participating in PD activities helps teachers improve their teaching skills and classroom management, deepen their knowledge, and broaden their theoretical perspectives (Postholm, 2012). The new skills acquired from PD activities will enrich and enhance the schools’ educational and teaching practices. Therefore, teachers with altruistic motivation to teach are likely to experience high job satisfaction, as their work is perceived to significantly benefit both students and schools. Additionally, teacher altruistic motivation was positively related to job satisfaction, supporting prior studies (Nadim et al., 2012; Shah et al., 2012; Tirana et al., 2023). This finding supported H2 and aligned with Schwartz’s human values framework. One possible explanation is that individuals with self-transcendence values derive satisfaction from contributing to society and assisting others. They contribute to society not for external recognition or rewards, but for reasons beyond personal preference. They are generally unconcerned with personal costs and benefits (Elster, 2006). The teaching profession is built on dedication and love. It calls on teachers to commit to supporting students’ holistic development, thereby cultivating well-rounded graduates for society (Mart, 2013). If individuals with strong altruistic motivation enter the teaching profession, it demonstrates a strong alignment between their personal values and occupational demands. Therefore, teacher altruistic motivation can be a significant factor in enhancing their job satisfaction.

Engagement in PD activities did not mediate the relationship between teacher extrinsic motivation and job satisfaction. This finding provided partial support for H2 and was consistent with Schwartz’s human values framework. The theory argues that individuals with self-enhancement values prioritize extrinsic rewards, timely feedback, and short-term interests (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan, 1995). Generally, a primary aim of teacher PD is the enhancement of teaching skills and broader educational skills. However, participation in PD activities requires substantial time and financial investment (Damianidou, 2024). This finding contrasts with the reward preferences typical of teachers with strong extrinsic motivation. After all, these teachers typically prioritize a stable career path and a reliable income. They have little incentive to acquire new skills for the purpose of teaching improvement. They lack strong career ambition and are focused primarily on fulfilling their basic teaching tasks within a uniform teacher compensation system that provides little financial incentive for excellence (Cai et al., 2018). In this regard, they are less likely to actively participate in PD activities. Additionally, this positive relationship between extrinsic motivation and job satisfaction is in line with previous studies (Baroudi et al., 2022; Nadim et al., 2012; Tirana et al., 2023). This finding supported Schwartz’s human values framework and confirmed H2. One possible explanation is as follows: individuals driven by self-enhancement values prioritize career stability, income reliability, and lighter workloads, particularly during global economic downturn with high unemployment rates (Rucinski, Melanie, 2023). Like many other education systems (VarkeyFoundation, 2019), public secondary teachers in China benefit from a steady career path, along with relatively low work pressure, stable incomes, and high social status (Zhang et al., 2019). These career characteristics attract individuals with extrinsic motivation to become teachers. In other words, the teaching profession is a desirable career choice for the extrinsically motivated. In this regard, when their extrinsic motivation is fulfilled, teachers who are primarily driven by extrinsic rewards experience high job satisfaction.

Theoretical and practical implications

This study offers several contributions to the literature. First, this research contributes to the field by uniquely focusing on the mediating role of PD engagement, an area that has been largely underexplored. Specifically, this work elucidates the mediating function of PD engagement in the relationships between job satisfaction and its two predictors—teacher motivation and perceived value and policy orientation. Existing literature has documented that teacher self-efficacy (Chang & Sung, 2024) and instructional practice (Ertaş & Pekmezci, 2025) mediate the motivation-job satisfaction relationship. Nevertheless, the extent to which PD engagement plays a mediating role in this context remains unclear. Second, this research incorporated both motivational dimensions (altruistic and extrinsic) alongside teachers’ value-policy perceptions to comprehensively evaluate their effects on job satisfaction within a single analytical model. In contrast to previous studies that have examined only one or two types of teacher motivation, the present study adopts a broader perspective (Chang & Sung, 2024; Ertaş & Pekmezci, 2025). Third, a key finding is that teachers’ value-policy perceptions exert greater influence on job satisfaction than their motivation levels. Existing studies have largely failed to consider teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation as an equally important predictor alongside motivation, and there is a lack of research using consistent datasets to compare their impacts on job satisfaction (Chang & Sung, 2024; Ertaş & Pekmezci, 2025).

These results inform the following policy suggestions for educational practice and administration. First, extrinsic motivation emerged as the factor most weakly linked to job satisfaction, whereas altruistic motivation and perceptions of value and policy orientation exhibited more substantial effects. Importantly, PD activities played no mediating role in this relationship. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize PD and policy designs that help teachers move from externally controlled motivation toward more self-determined engagement in their work. Second, PD activities served as a significant mediator in the relationship between altruistic motivation and job satisfaction. Hence, it is recommended that school management focus on developing high-quality PD opportunities to promote teacher job satisfaction.

Third, compared to motivation and PD engagement, teachers’ perceptions of value and policy orientation showed the strongest association with job satisfaction. Hence, it is recommended that educational authorities facilitate teacher involvement in policy decisions, which can contribute to increased job satisfaction.

Limitations

It is important to note the following limitations of the present study. First, the self-reported nature of the main variables may have introduced systematic measurement error, particularly common method variance. Future investigations would benefit from incorporating objective data (e.g., administrative data) to validate and extend the current findings. Second, this research analyzed the intercorrelations among four key constructs: teacher motivation, perceptions of value and policy orientation, PD engagement, and job satisfaction. Future investigations could build on these findings by using panel data to explore the causal pathways between these key variables. Third, this study relied on data collected from the Shanghai respondents in the TALIS 2018 administration. Future work could leverage the TALIS 2024 dataset across additional regions to replicate and extend the current findings regarding teacher motivation, value orientation perceptions, and job satisfaction.

Conclusion

Grounded in Schwartz’s human values framework, this study found that teacher altruistic motivation and perceptions of value and policy orientation were positively and indirectly related to job satisfaction, partially mediated by PD engagement. A similar mediating role was not observed in the relationship between teacher extrinsic motivation and job satisfaction. These findings reveal the heterogeneous roles of two fundamental human values in engagement with PD activities. They provide new evidence that individuals with self-transcendence values show higher PD involvement, while confirming the insignificant effect of self-enhancement values.

Acknowledgement: No applicable.

Funding Statement: We appreciate the generous support from the projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72404256)

Author Contributions: Yanbin Guo conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote and revised the manuscript, collected the data. Guoxiu Tian analyzed and interpreted the analysis, wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials: Not applicable.

Ethics Approval: No applicable.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Akiba, M., Byun, S.-y, Jiang, X., Kim, K., & Moran, A. (2023). Do teachers feel valued in society? Occupational value of the teaching profession in OECD countries. AERA Open, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231179184 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Baroudi, S., Tamim, R., & Hojeij, Z. (2022). A quantitative investigation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing teachers’ job satisfaction IN Lebanon. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734210 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Bigsby, J., & Firestone, W. (2017). Why teachers participate in professional development: Lessons from a schoolwide teacher study group. The New Educator, 13(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2015.1063743 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Cable, D., & Edwards, J. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Caddle, M., Bautista, A., Brizuela, B., & Sharpe, S. (2016). Evaluating mathematics teachers’ professional development motivations and needs. REDIMAT, 5(2), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2016.2093 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Cai, Y., Bi, Y., Wang, L., Cravens, X., & Li, Y. (2018). The construct of teachers’ pay satisfaction: A case study of primary and secondary schools in China. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1421163 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Chang, T. J., & Sung, Y. T. (2024). Does teacher motivation really matter? Exploring the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy in the relationship between motivation and job satisfaction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(6), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00803-4 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Chin, W., Thatcher, J., & Wright, R. (2012). Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703491 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Damianidou, E. (2024). Obligatory professional training for in-service teachers: Worthy time or a waste of time? European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1961734 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]

Elster, J. (2006). Altruistic behavior and altruistic motivations. In: S.-C. Kolm, J. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 183–206). North Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01003-7 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ertaş, B., & Pekmezci, F. (2025). Career motivation and job satisfaction in Türkiye: Mediating role of teacher İnnovativeness and İnstructional practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00846-1 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Fray, L., & Gore, J. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75(10), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.009 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Geldenhuys, J., & Oosthuizen, L. (2015). Challenges influencing teachers’ involvement in continuous professional development: A South African perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.010 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Giersch, J. (2016). A test of personal and social utility values and the appeal of a career in teaching. Educational Research For Policy and Practice, 15(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-016-9194-7 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Guo, Y. (2024). Improving teacher performance: Evolution and enlightenment of primary and middle school teacher certification institution in China (1978–2023). European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12701. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12701 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ingersoll, R. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved from: https://repository.upenn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/8591574e-12e1-4be8-abbe-0d5461efd489/content. [Google Scholar]

Kang, H., & Mavrogordato, M. (2023). Examining the relationship between multiple facets of professional development and teacher job satisfaction in the United States. Educational Studies, 51(4), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2023.2256921 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Kennedy, M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ma, X., & Marion, R. (2025). Linking distributed leadership to teacher job satisfaction in China: Mediating roles of teacher well-being and work motivation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241303299 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Mart, Ç. (2013). A passionate teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 437–442. [Google Scholar]

MOE. (2024). Statistical Bulletin on National Education Development in 2024. Retrieved from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202506/t20250611_1193760.html. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA, USA: Muthén & Muthén. [Google Scholar]

Nadim, M., Chaudhry, M. S., Kalyar, M. N., & Riaz, T. (2012). Effects of motivational factors on teachers’ job satisfaction: A study on public sector degree colleges of Punjab. Pakistan the Journal of Commerce, 4(4), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n3p70 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Oduro, F., Parker, D., & Mensah, E. (2024). The role of teacher autonomy, school climate, and “ perceptions of value & policy influence” in predicting lower secondary school teachers’ job satisfaction in South Africa. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(4), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2313005 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

OECD (2018). TALIS 2018 Technical Report. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/edu/talis/talis2018supportmaterials/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf. [Google Scholar]

OECD (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]

Postholm, M. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Rucinski, Melanie (2023). The Effects of Economic Conditions on the Labor Market for Teachers. EdWorkingPaper No. 23-884. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED638891 [Google Scholar]

Ryan, R. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of interogative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Shah, M., Rehman, M., Akhtar, G., Zafar, H., & Riaz, A. (2012). Job satisfaction and motivation of teachers of public educational institutions. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 271–281. [Google Scholar]

Smet, M. (2022). Professional development and teacher job satisfaction: Evidence from a multilevel model. Mathematics, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010051 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Tang, S., Wong, A., & Cheng, M. (2015). The preparation of highly motivated and professionally competent teachers in initial teacher education. Journal of Education For Teaching, 41(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1010875 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Tirana, J., Trungu, D., & Chiesi, L. L. (2023). Motivation factors influence teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(3), 265–272. [Google Scholar]

VarkeyFoundation (2019). Global Teacher Status Index 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/_files/ugd/5c330e_6df4627a869444728143dc4b04f19494.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Wang, H., & Klassen, R. (2023). Longitudinal relationships between teachers’ utility values and quitting intentions: A person-organization fit perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127(1), 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104109 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Yoon, I., & Kim, M. (2022). Dynamic patterns of teachers’ professional development participation and their relations with socio-demographic characteristics, teacher self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109(1), 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103565 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Yoon, I., & Kim, M. (2023). Determinants of teachers’ positive perception on their professional development experience: An application of LASSO-based machine learning approach. Professional Development in Education, 2025, 51(5), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2264296 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Zhang, L., Yu, S., & Liu, H. (2019). Understanding teachers’ motivation for and commitment to teaching: Profiles of Chinese early career, early childhood teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(7), 890–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1670155 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]