Samuel Helrich1, Wesley Pate1, Nishant Garg1, Philip Barbosa2, Shaun Wason1
Canadian Journal of Urology, Vol.28, No.6, pp. 10889-10899, 2021
Abstract Introduction: To compare pelvic ultrasound (PUS) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the estimation of prostate size.
Materials and methods: After IRB approval, we performed a single-center, retrospective study of 91 patients who had prostate sizing between August 2013 and June 2017. Correlation, reliability, and agreement between PUS, TRUS, and MRI were calculated through the Pearson coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Data was stratified by prostate size, body mass index, and time between imaging acquisition.
Results: A total of 91 patients underwent all three imaging methods. Median age was 64, median… More >