Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

RESIDENT’S CORNER

Septic shock after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Is ciprofloxacin prophylaxis always protecting?

Saleh Binsaleh1, Mana Al-Assiri1, Samuel Aronson2, Andrew Steinberg1

1 Division of Urology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2 Division of Urology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Address correspondence Dr. Andrew Steinberg, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L8-309, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4 Canada

Canadian Journal of Urology 2004, 11(4), 2352-2353.

Abstract

We report a case of septic shock complicating transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy despite antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin. Patient was recently treated with the same agent for other infectious illnesses.

Keywords

septic shock, TRUS, prostate, biopsy, complication

Cite This Article

APA Style
Binsaleh, S., Al-Assiri, M., Aronson, S., Steinberg, A. (2004). Septic shock after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Is ciprofloxacin prophylaxis always protecting?. Canadian Journal of Urology, 11(4), 2352–2353.
Vancouver Style
Binsaleh S, Al-Assiri M, Aronson S, Steinberg A. Septic shock after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Is ciprofloxacin prophylaxis always protecting?. Can J Urology. 2004;11(4):2352–2353.
IEEE Style
S. Binsaleh, M. Al-Assiri, S. Aronson, and A. Steinberg, “Septic shock after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Is ciprofloxacin prophylaxis always protecting?,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2352–2353, 2004.



cc Copyright © 2004 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 35

    View

  • 31

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link