Open Access
RESIDENT’S CORNER
Small bowel perforation during suprapubic tube exchange
Anne K. Mongiu, Brain T. Helfand, Stephanie J. Kielb
Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Stephanie Kielb, Northwestern
University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of
Urology, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Tarry 16-703, Chicago,
IL 60611-3008 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2009, 16(1), 4519-4521.
Abstract
Suprapubic tube placement is a common urological
procedure with a low incidence of complications,
including hematuria, catheter blockage, recurrent urinary
tract infections, and rarely, injury to adjacent organs.
Fortunately, most serious complications are discovered
shortly after initial suprapubic tube placement and are
readily corrected. Very few cases of delayed complications
or injuries have been reported. We report a case of
Foley perforation into the ileum during suprapubic tube
exchange discovered more than 8 months after initial
placement, and preceding numerous monthly changes that
occurred without incident. While a rare complication,
physicians should be conscious of the potential for delayed
injury in patients managed with long term suprapubic
tube placement.
Keywords
catheterization, placement, suprapubic, urinary tract infection
Cite This Article
APA Style
Mongiu, A.K., Helfand, B.T., Kielb, S.J. (2009). Small bowel perforation during suprapubic tube exchange. Canadian Journal of Urology, 16(1), 4519–4521.
Vancouver Style
Mongiu AK, Helfand BT, Kielb SJ. Small bowel perforation during suprapubic tube exchange. Can J Urology. 2009;16(1):4519–4521.
IEEE Style
A.K. Mongiu, B.T. Helfand, and S.J. Kielb, “Small bowel perforation during suprapubic tube exchange,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4519–4521, 2009.
Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Journal of Urology.