Open Access
REVIEW
Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Anthony J. Polcari, Cory M. Hugen, Thomas M. Turk
Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Anthony J. Polcari, Department
of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Fahey Center,
Room 200, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
Canadian Journal of Urology 2009, 16(6), 4887-4894.
Abstract
While radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold
standard of treatment for patients with upper tract
urothelial tumors, technological advances have made
endoscopic management possible. The careful selection
of patients for such an approach is dependent upon an
accurate diagnosis and an understanding of the natural
history of the disease. High grade tumors behave
aggressively and warrant radical extirpation unless an
absolute contraindication exists. Motivated patients
with low grade tumors and relative contraindications to
nephroureterectomy can be managed with percutaneous
or retrograde ureteroscopic techniques. High recurrence
rates in the ipsilateral upper tract and bladder mandate
close surveillance of patients treated conservatively. We
review the important diagnostic, staging, technical, and
surveillance issues in the endoscopic treatment of upper
tract urothelial carcinoma.
Keywords
endoscopic, upper tract, urothelial carcinoma, ureteroscopic, percutaneous
Cite This Article
APA Style
Polcari, A.J., Hugen, C.M., Turk, T.M. (2009). Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Canadian Journal of Urology, 16(6), 4887–4894.
Vancouver Style
Polcari AJ, Hugen CM, Turk TM. Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can J Urology. 2009;16(6):4887–4894.
IEEE Style
A.J. Polcari, C.M. Hugen, and T.M. Turk, “Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 4887–4894, 2009.
Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Journal of Urology.