Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND ROBOTIC SURGERY

Prophylactic belladonna suppositories on anesthetic recovery after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Federica Scavonetto1, David R. Lamborn1, Joan M. Mccaffrey1, Darrell R. Schroeder2, Mattew T. Gettman3, Juraj Sprung1, Toby N. Weingarten1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
2 Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
3 Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Toby N. Weingarten, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55901 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2013, 20(3), 6799-6804.

Abstract

Introduction: Two prospective trials have demonstrated that prophylactic antimuscarinics following prostatectomy reduce pain from bladder spasms. Our practice adopted the routine administration of prophylactic belladonna and opium (B&O) suppositories to patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). The aim of this study is to determine if this change in clinical practice was associated with improvement of postoperative outcomes.
Materials and methods: The medical records of 202 patients who underwent RALP surgery, either administered or not administered prophylactic B&O suppositories in the immediate postoperative period, were abstracted for duration of anesthesia recovery, pain, and analgesic use.
Results: Patient and surgical characteristics between groups were similar except that the B&O group was slightly older (p = 0.04) and administered less opioid analgesics (p = 0.05). There was no difference between groups in the duration of phase I recovery from anesthesia (p = 0.96). Multivariable adjustments for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and surgical duration were made, and again it was found that suppository administration had no association with phase I recovery times (p = 0.94). The use of antimuscarinic medication for bladder spasms in the B&O group was less during phase I recovery (p < 0.01), but was similar during the first 24 hours (p = 0.66). Postoperative sedation, opioid analgesic requirements, and pain scales were similar during phase I recovery and the first 24 postoperative hours. Hospital length of stay was similar.
Discussion: The introduction of prophylactic B&O suppositories at the immediate conclusion of RALP surgery was not associated with improvements of the postoperative course.

Keywords

belladonna and opium suppository, prostate surgery, bladder spasm

Cite This Article

APA Style
Scavonetto, F., Lamborn, D.R., Mccaffrey, J.M., Schroeder, D.R., Gettman, M.T. et al. (2013). Prophylactic belladonna suppositories on anesthetic recovery after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology, 20(3), 6799–6804.
Vancouver Style
Scavonetto F, Lamborn DR, Mccaffrey JM, Schroeder DR, Gettman MT, Sprung J, et al. Prophylactic belladonna suppositories on anesthetic recovery after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urology. 2013;20(3):6799–6804.
IEEE Style
F. Scavonetto et al., “Prophylactic belladonna suppositories on anesthetic recovery after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 6799–6804, 2013.



cc Copyright © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 145

    View

  • 113

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link