Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion

Matthew Hall1, Allison Polland2, Steven Weissbart2, Stephen Mock3, Neil Grafstein2

1 Newton Medical Center, Newton, New Jersey, USA
2 Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
3 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Allison Polland, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1272 New York, NY 10029 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2014, 21(4), 7344-7349.

Abstract

Introduction: While urinary retention is a known complication of AdVance male sling (AMS) placement for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), there is minimal data regarding ultimate continence outcomes for patients who experience this complication. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of continence after AMS placement in patients who had postoperative urinary retention as compared with those patients who did not.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent AMS placement for PPI between 2008 and 2011 with postoperative void trial (TOV). Preoperative factors such as urodynamic findings, daily pad number (PPD) and weight were recorded. Follow up data included pad use, need for catheterization and complications. Statistical analysis compared patients with and without postoperative urinary retention.
Results: Thirty-five patients were included with a mean follow up of 11.8 months. Complete continence was 60%, while 83% of patients were improved. PPD improved from 2.9 pads to 0.8 pads after AMS placement. Sixteen patients (46%) had postoperative urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Of the 16 patients in postoperative retention, 100% were completely continent (PPD = 0), compared to 5 of 19 patients (26%) who passed first TOV (p < 0.00001). All patients who required CIC were able to void within 7 days.
Conclusions: Postoperative urinary retention after AMS placement for PPI occurs in about 50% of patients and is short-lived. Patients who experienced postoperative urinary retention had good continence outcomes.

Keywords

urinary incontinence, prostatectomy, advance male sling, retention

Cite This Article

APA Style
Hall, M., Polland, A., Weissbart, S., Mock, S., Grafstein, N. (2014). Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion. Canadian Journal of Urology, 21(4), 7344–7349.
Vancouver Style
Hall M, Polland A, Weissbart S, Mock S, Grafstein N. Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion. Can J Urology. 2014;21(4):7344–7349.
IEEE Style
M. Hall, A. Polland, S. Weissbart, S. Mock, and N. Grafstein, “Prognostic value of postoperative urinary retention after male sling insertion,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 7344–7349, 2014.



cc Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 30

    View

  • 30

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link