Open Access

ARTICLE

Bipolar energy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a current systematic review of the literature

Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva^1,*, Luke Bidikov^1,2,*, Walker Michaels¹, Diedra Gustafson¹, Wilson R. Molina^1,2, Fernando J. Kim^1,2

1 Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
2 Department of Urology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
* Authors gave the same contribution
Address correspondence to Dr. Fernando J. Kim, Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80204 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2015, 22(Suppl.5), 30-44.

Abstract

instruction: Introduction: For decades, the monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate has been established as the minimally invasive surgical treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In recent years, new technologies and devices emerged to reduce the morbidity and improve outcomes for this treatment approach. Bipolar energy introduced the use of saline irrigation and laser technology increased the urological armamentarium to treat BPH. We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding bipolar technology for the treatment of BPH.
instruction: Materials and methods: A MEDLINE database search using the PRISMA methodology. Selected literature was restricted to articles published in English and published between 2005 and 2015. Articles regarding techniques using bipolar energy were included, while manuscripts that used a different technique, hybrid techniques, or techniques other than bipolar resection, bipolar vaporization, and bipolar enucleation were excluded.
instruction: Results: The use of bipolar energy in the endoscopic treatment of BPH presented a significant reduction in operative time, perioperative complications, shorter catheterization time, reduced number of blood products transfused, and shorter hospital stay compared to standard techniques. Postoperative outcomes showed that bipolar energy was safe and offered significant outcome improvement when compared to traditional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
instruction: Conclusion: The use of bipolar energy in the surgical treatment of patients with BPH is safe and is associated with improvements in perioperative outcomes. Short and mid-term functional outcomes are comparable to standard techniques, but long term functional outcomes need better clinical evaluation.

---

Keywords

---