Open Access
HOW I DO IT
How I do it: Balloon tamponade of prostatic fossa following Aquablation
1
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation, Redwood Shores, California, USA
2
Tauranga Hospital, Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga, New Zealand
3
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
Address correspondence to Dr. Peter Gilling, Tauranga
Hospital, Private Bag 12024, Tauranga 3143 New Zealand
Canadian Journal of Urology 2017, 24(4), 8937-8940.
Abstract
Since its first report in the 1870s, control of bleeding after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has remained a concern. Foley’s initial report of a urinary catheter involved placement of the balloon into the prostatic fossa following TURP. Removal of prostate tissue with a high-velocity saline stream (Aquablation) is a recently reported alternative to TURP. As Aquablation is heat-free, alternatives to non-thermal hemostasis were sought to optimize the procedure. We report use of a balloon catheter in the prostatic fossa after Aquablation as a post-resection hemostatic method.Keywords
Cite This Article
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Download PDF
Downloads
Citation Tools