Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Nephrostomy tube placement prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy does not impact outcomes

Priyanka Bearelly1,*, Claire Lis2,*, James Trussler2,, Mark H. Katz1, Richard K. Babayan1, David S. Wang1

1 Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
* authors contributed equally to this work
Address correspondence to Dr. Priyanka Bearelly, Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, 725 Albany Street, Suite 3B, Boston MA 02118 USA

Canadian Journal of Urology 2018, 25(5), 9497-9502.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to compare outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed with a nephrostomy tube placed prior to surgery versus access obtained at the time of surgery.
Materials and methods: Between March 2005 and August 2014, 233 PCNLs were performed. One hundred and nine of those cases underwent placement of nephrostomy tubes at least 1 day prior to surgery (Group A), and the remaining 124 cases were performed in which access was obtained at the time of PCNL (Group B). Patient demographics, comorbidities, stone size, sepsis rates, and additional complication rates, including bleeding and inability to access the stone, were compared.
Results: There were no significant differences in patient demographics, stone size, or comorbidities when comparing the two groups. Success rates were not significantly different, 92.7% in Group A compared to 94.4% in Group B. Similarly, there was no significant difference in complication rates or ICU admissions. The rate of sepsis in Group A was 1.83% compared to 2.42% in Group B, which showed no statistical significance. Notably, there were more patients with neurogenic bladders in the pre-placement group (p = 0.05).
Conclusion: Pre-placement of a nephrostomy tube prior to PCNL did not result in a decreased incidence of complications or sepsis and did not demonstrate increased success rates. Patients with neurogenic bladders may be more vulnerable to suffering from sepsis, and therefore, the role of timing of nephrostomy tube placement must be further studied.

Keywords

PCNL, nephrostomy tube, renal stone

Cite This Article

APA Style
Bearelly, P., Lis, C., Trussler, J., Katz, M.H., Babayan, R.K. et al. (2018). Nephrostomy tube placement prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy does not impact outcomes. Canadian Journal of Urology, 25(5), 9497–9502.
Vancouver Style
Bearelly P, Lis C, Trussler J, Katz MH, Babayan RK, Wang DS. Nephrostomy tube placement prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy does not impact outcomes. Can J Urology. 2018;25(5):9497–9502.
IEEE Style
P. Bearelly, C. Lis, J. Trussler, M.H. Katz, R.K. Babayan, and D.S. Wang, “Nephrostomy tube placement prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy does not impact outcomes,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 9497–9502, 2018.



cc Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 34

    View

  • 64

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link