Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in chronic kidney damage: a prospective study

Nazım Furkan Günay*, Mücahit Gelmiş, Çağlar Dizdaroğlu, Abdullah Esmeray, Ufuk Çağlar, Ömer Sarılar, Faruk Özgör

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34260, Türkiye

* Corresponding Author: Nazım Furkan Günay. Email: email

Canadian Journal of Urology 2026, 33(2), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.072419

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses unique challenges in the management of renal stones, and high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions is limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) on perioperative outcomes and long-term renal function in patients with CKD and renal stones. Methods: This prospective randomized study included 60 CKD patients with renal stones measuring 1–4 cm. Participants were randomized into f-URS (n = 24) and m-PCNL (n = 36) groups. Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative parameters were recorded. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of any residual fragments on postoperative computed tomography (CT) at 1 month. Renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, and CKD stage at baseline and 6 months. A post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis was performed for patients with 10–20 mm stones. Results: Stone-free rates were comparable between groups (79.2% vs. 86.1%, p > 0.05). f-URS was associated with shorter operative duration, reduced fluoroscopy time, lower hemoglobin drop, and shorter hospital stay (all p < 0.01). At 6 months, median renal function values were more favorable in the f-URS group, with higher median eGFR (44.0 vs. 51.5 mL/min, p = 0.042) and lower creatinine (1.6 vs. 1.4 mg/dL, p = 0.031), whereas the changes from baseline (ΔeGFR and Δcreatinine) did not show a statistically significant difference. In the exploratory 10–20 mm subgroup results were statistically in favor of f-URS, but these findings should not be generalized due to the small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis. Conclusions: Both f-URS and m-PCNL achieved similar stone clearance in CKD patients. f-URS may offer advantages regarding perioperative safety and renal function preservation, but these observations require confirmation in larger studies with long-term follow-up. Treatment decisions in this high-risk population should be individualized.

Keywords

flexible ureteroscopy; chronic kidney disease; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; kidney stones

Cite This Article

APA Style
Günay, N.F., Gelmiş, M., Dizdaroğlu, Ç., Esmeray, A., Çağlar, U. et al. (2026). Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in chronic kidney damage: a prospective study. Canadian Journal of Urology, 33(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.072419
Vancouver Style
Günay NF, Gelmiş M, Dizdaroğlu Ç, Esmeray A, Çağlar U, Sarılar Ö, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in chronic kidney damage: a prospective study. Can J Urology. 2026;33(2):281–290. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.072419
IEEE Style
N. F. Günay et al., “Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in chronic kidney damage: a prospective study,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 281–290, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.072419



cc Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 504

    View

  • 209

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link