Shuzhen SHI1, 2, Ming LIU1, 2, Wenjuan MA1, 2, Ya GAO1, 2, Long GE3, Xiping SHEN3, Jiarui WU4, Junhua ZHANG5, *, Jinhui TIAN1, 2, *
BIOCELL, Vol.43, No.4, pp. 233-251, 2019, DOI:10.32604/biocell.2019.07624
Abstract The study aimed to analyze the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs)/metaanalyses
(MAs) of animal models to provide references for later studies and avoid the waste of medical resources.
EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to November 2017, with no language restriction.
Two reviewers selected inclusion dependently and extracted the basic characteristics. Review Manager 5.3, stata
12.0, and SPSS 21 software were used to conduct analyses. A total of 46 SRs/MAs were included. The results showed
that the English databases with high retrieval frequency are PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science.
67.31% (31/46) of the articles… More >
Login
Register
