Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

EB-Guided Optimization of Heliostat Fields with Validated Projection Losses and HFLCAL Sensitivity

Zichang Meng, Na Chen, Qi Li, Qingyi Liu, Hongfei Jiang*

School of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China

* Corresponding Author: Hongfei Jiang. Email: email

Energy Engineering 2026, 123(4), 7 https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.072848

Abstract

Heliostat field design for tower solar thermal plants must jointly address solar geometry, optical losses, and layout optimization under engineering constraints. We develop an end-to-end workflow that (i) adopts a consistent East–North–Up (ENU) convention for all plant- and sun-related vectors; (ii) integrates cosine efficiency, projection-based shading and blocking (SB), atmospheric transmittance, and an HFLCAL (heliostat field local calculation) truncation model into a single optical chain; and (iii) couples an Eliminate-Blocking (EB) layout prior with an improved “Cheetah” metaheuristic to search ring topology, mirror sizes, and heights while enforcing spacing, kinematics, and rated-power requirements. Projection-based SB is calibrated against Monte-Carlo ray tracing at representative sun positions, and the HFLCAL truncation model is used to quantify sensitivities to sunshape and error-budget parameters. In a three-phase study (fixed-size baseline, uniform sizing, heterogeneous sizing), the EB-guided optimizer improves annual per-area output relative to a radial baseline and reliably attains a 60 MW target. Under equal evaluation budgets, the proposed optimizer converges faster and with lower variance than GA- and PSO-based baselines, while respecting panel-level peak-flux limits through a smooth penalization of flux violations. The resulting layouts exhibit outward-increasing azimuthal spacing and ring-wise size sharing that are consistent with recent heliostat-field deployment experience. The framework is modular, auditable, and readily adaptable to alternative receivers, sites, and cost-aware objectives.

Keywords

Heliostat field; shading and blocking; HFLCAL truncation; eliminate-blocking layout; metaheuristics; solar tower; sensitivity analysis

Cite This Article

APA Style
Meng, Z., Chen, N., Li, Q., Liu, Q., Jiang, H. (2026). EB-Guided Optimization of Heliostat Fields with Validated Projection Losses and HFLCAL Sensitivity. Energy Engineering, 123(4), 7. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.072848
Vancouver Style
Meng Z, Chen N, Li Q, Liu Q, Jiang H. EB-Guided Optimization of Heliostat Fields with Validated Projection Losses and HFLCAL Sensitivity. Energ Eng. 2026;123(4):7. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.072848
IEEE Style
Z. Meng, N. Chen, Q. Li, Q. Liu, and H. Jiang, “EB-Guided Optimization of Heliostat Fields with Validated Projection Losses and HFLCAL Sensitivity,” Energ. Eng., vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 7, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.072848



cc Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 435

    View

  • 183

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link