Table of Content

Open Access

ARTICLE

Comparison Between Different Immersed Boundary Conditions for Simulation of Complex Fluid Flows

A. Mark1,2, R. Rundqvist1, F. Edelvik1
FCC, Chalmers Science Park, SE-412 88 Göteborg, Sweden
andreas.mark@fcc.chalmers.se

Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing 2011, 7(3), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.3970/fdmp.2011.007.241

Abstract

In the literature immersed boundary methods are employed to simulate complex flows around moving arbitrary bodies without the necessity of remeshing. These methods employ a regular Eulerian mesh to simulate the fluid flow and a Lagrangian representation of the boundary of the bodies. The two representations can be coupled through an immersed boundary condition constraining the fluid to exactly follow the boundary of the bodies (immersed boundaries). Typically such methods suffer from accuracy problems, that arise from spurious mass fluxes over the immersed boundary (IB), pressure boundary conditions or high density ratios. The mirroring IB method Mark (2008); Mark and van Wachem (2008) resolves these problems by ensuring zero mass flux over the IB instead of employing a pressure boundary condition. In this work the mirroring IB method together with a hybrid IB condition are implemented and validated in IBOFlow. IBOFlow is an incompressible finite-volume based fluid flow solver. The Navier-Stokes' equations are coupled with the SIMPLEC method by Doormaal and Raithby (1984) and discretized on a Cartesian octree grid that can be dynamically refined and coarsened, enabling grid refinement to follow moving bodies. The variables are stored in a co-located configuration and pressure weighted flux interpolation by Rhie and Chow (1983) is employed to prevent pressure oscillations. In the implemented IB method the immersed bodies are represented by an analytical description or by a triangulation. The method models the presence of the bodies inside the fluid by an implicitly formulated IB condition, which constrains the fluid velocity to the boundary velocity with second-order accuracy. The original mirroring IB condition mirrors the velocity field over the local IB and the hybrid IB condition mirrors and extrapolates the fluid velocity onto the IB. These IB conditions generate a fictitious velocity field inside the bodies, which is excluded in the continuity equation to ensure zero mass flux over the boundary. The fluid flow over an immersed sphere is simulated to validate and compare the different IB conditions. The simulated drag force is compared to experimental findings with excellent agreement and a detailed convergence study of the error of the fluid velocity integrated over the immersed boundary is performed to show the strictly second-order accuracy of the implemented IB conditions. It is shown that the error is reduced with the hybrid IB condition compared to the original mirroring IB condition. In addition, a sedimenting sphere with a moving grid refinement is simulated to validate the hybrid method and show the potential of the dynamic octree grid.

Keywords

immersed boundary condition, mirroring immersed boundary method, implicit method

Cite This Article

Mark, A., Rundqvist, R., Edelvik, F. (2011). Comparison Between Different Immersed Boundary Conditions for Simulation of Complex Fluid Flows. FDMP-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 7(3), 241–258.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 1420

    View

  • 910

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link

WeChat scan