iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Nickel Enhances Soybean Growth and Resilience to Iron Stress by Improving Gas Exchange and Antioxidant Metabolism

Elizeu Monteiro Pereira Júnior, Lorena de Souza Cunha, Andreza Sousa Carmo, Ana Clara Lucarini, Ynglety Cascaes Pereira Matos, Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato, Elaine Maria Silva Guedes Lobato*

Núcleo de Pesquisa Vegetal Básica e Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Paragominas, Brazil

* Corresponding Author: Elaine Maria Silva Guedes Lobato. Email: email

(This article belongs to the Special Issue: Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) and Plant Stress)

Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2026, 95(5), 15 https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.072138

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) is an essential metallic micronutrient for optimal plant growth and development, regulator of essential metabolic processes, but its interaction with other essential nutrients can result in differences in the absorption of these nutrients, which can disrupt the ionic balance. The objective of this research was to evaluate the physiological performance and growth of soybean plants subjected to Ni levels applied via soil under Fe (iron) excess, determining the behavior of redox metabolism, gas exchange, and photosynthetic pigments. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with a factorial 2 × 3, with two Fe levels, defined as control Fe (35.7 μM) and excess Fe (357 μM), and three Ni levels (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1). Results revealed that Fe toxicity caused significant reductions for leaf dry matter (LDM) and stem dry matter (SDM), but Ni applied to the soil provided increases of 8% and 22% in LDM and SDM. Treatment with toxic Fe caused reductions in photosynthetic pigments in soybean plants. However, 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni caused increases (p < 0.05) of 10%, 12%, 10%, and 36% for chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids. Plants treated with 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni and exposed to Fe stress had boosted the antioxidant system, increasing catalase (14%) and ascorbate peroxidase (16%), while the oxidative damage occasioned by Fe excess in was reduced 6% and 3% in malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide, as compared to Fe excess +0.2 mg kg−1 Ni. Therefore, the Ni application via soil under experimental conditions was found to be a possible mitigator of the phytotoxic effects caused by Fe excess in soybean plants.

Keywords

Biomass; Glycine max; micronutrient; photosynthesis

1 Introduction

Soybean is one of the main oil crops produced and consumed in the world, and Brazil is a biggest producer and exporter of this crop. The 2022/2023 harvest yielded a record production of 155.4 million tons, representing a 3.5% increase compared to the previous harvest [1]. Several factors contribute to this increase in worldwide yield, including favorable climate conditions, the use of cultivars with high vigor, and modern techniques in plant management [2,3].

Optimal development and consequent high yield are the result of extracting nutrients from the soil and proper nutritional management for the plant. Failure to provide nutrients, inadequate absorption, or even excess nutrients can result in mineral and nutritional deficiency [4]. For this reason, mineral nutrition has contributed significantly to crop yield, with the market offering various sources of fertilizers enriched, mainly in microelements [5].

Nickel (Ni) is an essential metallic micronutrient for optimal plant growth and development. Without an adequate supply of Ni, plants cannot complete their life cycle [6]. Currently, studies indicate positive physiological responses under adequate Ni level, benefiting the development of legumes with soil or foliar fertilization [7,8]. There is information in the literature on the direct influence of Ni on seed germination, nitrogen metabolism, root nodulation, enzymatic activities, and grain yield. However, Ni excess can also inhibit dry matter production and chlorophyll biosynthesis [9,10,11].

Essential metabolic processes are regulated by Ni, but its interaction with other essential nutrients, such as calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), and iron (Fe) can result in differences in the absorption of these nutrients, which can disrupt the ionic balance [9,12]. The interaction between elements can be synergistic, when the presence of one element in the medium increases the absorption of another, or antagonistic, when the presence of one element reduces the absorption of another [13]. The absorption of large amounts of essential metals, including the Fe, exposes plants to stress and negatively affects them through protein degradation due to the formation of ROS, which are highly phytotoxic [14], causing nutritional disorders, impairs gas exchange and the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments [15]. Based on the high physicochemical similarity between Fe and Ni, it is likely that Fe excess may disrupt Ni efficiency [16]. Therefore, it is important that the plant receives Ni adequately, with an optimal concentration and under a safe limit [17].

Fe is essential for photosynthesis, biological nitrogen fixation, respiration and electron transfer processes [18]. However, Fe excess induces significant risks to human health and the environment [19]. Among the metals, Fe is the most abundant, and its availability is highly influenced by soil pH and oxidation-reduction potential. Fe toxicity is frequently observed in flooded environments, where the absence of oxygen favors the conversion of Fe3+ to Fe2+, thus increasing its availability and absorption by plants. Clayey soils, considered dystrophic, have high acidity, a condition characterized by high Fe concentrations, for which soil pH correction is an alternative to restrict the element’s flow [20]. However, the practice may be insufficient to reduce Fe to non-toxic levels, and may trigger metabolic disorders in plants and compromise their crop yield.

The hypothesis of this research is that Ni supply can reduce the Fe excess, acting as a metallic antagonist [21]. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the physiological performance and growth of soybean plants subjected to Ni levels applied via soil under Fe toxicity conditions, determining the behavior of antioxidant metabolism, gas exchange, and photosynthetic pigments.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Soil, Containers, Plant Material and Fertilization

Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Paragominas, Brazil (2°55′ S, 47°34′ W), hosted the experiment. Minimum, maximum, and median temperatures were 22, 30, and 26.1°C and relative humidity ranged from 60% to 80% [22]. The soil was dystrophic yellow Latosol [23]. The soil in 4L pots was adjusted to pH 6.0 by adding 1.76 g of CaCO3 kg−1 and 0.76 g of MgCO3 kg−1 and incubated for 30 days. This experiment used soybean TMG 2158, a genotype known for combining technologies such as Intacta RR2 PRO (resistance to caterpillars and tolerance to glyphosate) and INOX technology (resistance to Asian soybean rust), with a super-early cycle and good performance under water-stress conditions. Previous research has shown that genotype TMG2158 soybeans respond well to Ni fertilization [24]. The soil received macro and micronutrients (excluding N, Fe, and Ni) at the following concentrations: 150 mg of P kg−1 (Ca[H2PO4]2), 50 mg of P kg−1 + 100 mg of K kg−1 (KH2PO4), 50 mg of S kg−1 (MgSO4·7H2O), 4.0 mg of Cl kg−1 (MnCl2·4H2O), 4.0 mg of Mn kg−1 (MnSO4·H2O), 3.0 mg of Zn kg−1 (ZnSO4·7H2O), 1.0 mg of B kg−1 (H3BO3), 2.0 mg of Cu kg−1 (CuSO4·5H2O), and 0.5 mg of Mo kg−1 ([NH4]6Mo7O24·4H2O). Table 1 shows soil physical and chemical properties after pH correction and fertilizer.

Table 1: Physical and chemical characteristics of the clayey yellow Oxisol before experiment, after incubation with limestone and after experiment.

Before Experiment
SandSiltClayFeNipHPCaMgKAlH+Al
%mg dm−3μg dm−3(CaCl2)mg dm−3cmolc dm−3
15137248.93.495.114.881.721.52.70.228.5
After Soil Incubation
FeNipHPCaMgKAlH+Al
8.101.125.725.192.227.14.20.019.8
After Experiment
Fe SupplyNi Supply (mg kg−1)FeNipHPCaMgKAlH+Al
Control0.22.500.804.70.416.36.20.40.229.0
Control1.03.122.714.50.615.35.90.60.228.3
Control3.02.8110.314.60.814.35.60.80.227.6
Excess0.23.101.324.61.013.35.31.00.226.9
Excess1.03.259.494.51.212.35.01.20.226.2
Excess3.03.4512.284.41.412.54.71.40.225.5

The data shown come from one sample per time (before experiment, after soil incubation, and after experiment). n = 1.

2.2 Design and Treatments

The experiment used a randomized design with a factorial 2 × 3, two Fe levels (control Fe: 35.7 μM/×1 Fe) and excess Fe: 357 μM/×10 Fe), and three Ni levels (0.2, 1.0, 3.0 mg kg−1). A prior study [25] set Fe concentrations [25], while another set Ni values [24]. To eliminate Ni and Fe contamination, solutions were cleansed [26]. This research had 30 experimental units, with one plant per pot, for a total of 6 treatments.

2.3 Fe and Ni Treatments

Directly into the pot went soybean seeds. On the fourth day following seeding, each plant received 1 mL of a Bradyrhizobium japonicum containing 8 × 108 cells·mL−1. Fe and Ni were added to the soil before seeding. FeSO4·7H2O was utilized at 35.7 and 357 μM Fe concentrations. Ni supplies, NiCl2 was utilized at 0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni. With deionized water only, the pots’ soil water content was regulated daily to about 70% of field capacity by weighing to a consistent weight. On the 45th day of the experiment, all plants’ physiological and morphological characteristics were examined, and leaf tissue was harvested for biochemical examination at stages R1-R2 during flowering [27].

2.4 Analysis Soil and Plants

Mehlich solution was used to measure extractable Ni in soil samples after plant culture. Samples were shaken for 10 min at 200 rpm and left for 16 h to obtain the extract [28]. ICP-OES measured nickel concentration. The dry mass of leaves, stem, and roots was calculated by collecting one plant from each container and oven drying at 65°C for 72 h. ICP-OES was used to measure macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations in leaves, stem, and root to assess plant nutrition [29].

The gas exchange was evaluated following the calibration procedures [30]. Stress indicators (hydrogen peroxide [H2O2] and malondialdehyde [MDA]) were extracted [31]. H2O2 was detected [32]. MDA was measured [33]. Electrolyte leakage (EL) was evaluated [34]. The chlorophyll and carotenoid determination were performed with 40 mg of leaf tissue grounded in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in the dark with 8 mL of 90% methanol. Pigments were quantified using a spectrophotometer (model UV-M51; Bel Photonics) [35]. Catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and soluble proteins were extracted [36]. Total soluble proteins [37]. The CAT activity was evaluated [38], with activity expressed in μmol H2O2 mg−1 protein min−1. The APX assay was done using the protocol [39], with APX activity expressed in μmol as AsA mg−1 protein min−1.

2.5 Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS System for Windows 6.11 [40]. ANOVA was used depending on the significance level in the F test (p < 0.05). To find significant treatment differences, factorial ANOVA and Scott-Knott test were used.

3 Results

3.1 Ni Stimulated the Biomass in Plants Exposed to Fe Excess

The effect of Fe isolated caused significant reductions for LDM and SDM in soybean plants (Table 2). However, the application of 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni provided increases of 8% and 22% in LDM and SDM, respectively, compared to 0.2 mg kg−1 Ni soil, for plants exposed to Fe excess. Plants in the Fe control condition also exhibited increases in LDM and SDM with increasing levels of Ni. Fe excess reduced (p > 0.05) the RDM and TDM. However, the large of Ni level again increased in 10% and 14% the same variables, compared to 0.2 mg kg−1 Ni, in the plants toxic Fe condition.

Table 2: Biomass of soybean plants exposed to Fe excess and different Ni supplies.

Fe SupplyNi Supply (mg kg−1)LDMSDMRDMTDM
Control0.24.00 ± 0.06 Ba3.53 ± 0.09 Ba2.73 ± 0.12 Ba10.26 ± 0.26 Ba
Control1.04.11 ± 0.06 Ba3.61 ± 0.11 Ba2.99 ± 0.16 Ba10.71 ± 0.28 Ba
Control3.04.33 ± 0.09 Aa3.90 ± 0.14 Aa3.66 ± 0.17 Aa11.89 ± 0.34 Aa
Excess0.23.94 ± 0.05 Ba3.24 ± 0.05 Bb2.24 ± 0.15 Cb9.42 ± 0.13 Cb
Excess1.04.06 ± 0.07 Ba3.36 ± 0.08 Bb2.63 ± 0.11 Bb10.05 ± 0.19 Bb
Excess3.04.25 ± 0.10 Aa3.58 ± 0.10 Ab3.28 ± 0.15 Ab11.11 ± 0.21 Ab

LDM = leaf dry matter; SDM = stem dry matter; RDM = root dry matter; TDM = total dry matter. Columns with different uppercase letters between Ni supplies (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 under equal Fe supply) and lowercase letters between Fe supplies (control and Fe excess under equal Ni supply) indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Means ± SD. n = 5.

3.2 Chloroplastic Pigments and Gas Exchange Were Improved with Ni Treatment

Fe excess caused decreases in chloroplastic pigments (Table 3). However, 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni caused increases (p < 0.05) of 10%, 12%, 10% and 36% for Chl a, Chl b, Total Chl and Car, respectively, compared to treatment with 0.2 mg kg−1 Ni and Fe excess. Chl a/Chl b and Total Chl/Car were significantly increased after Fe excess, but reduced by 9% and 2%, respectively, comparing with equal Fe treatment without Ni. To gas exchange, Fe toxicity provoked significant reductions (Table 4). Ni supplies mitigated the deleterious effects in plants under Fe excess. Plants exposed to Fe excess and treated with 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni presented increases in PN, gs, E, WUE and PN/Ci by 22%, 26%, 15%, 3% and 33%, respectively, when compared with equal treatment without Ni.

Table 3: Photosynthetic pigments of soybean plants exposed to Fe excess and different Ni supplies.

Fe SupplyNi Supply (mg kg−1)Chl a (mg g−1 FM)Chl b (mg g−1 FM)Total Chl (mg g−1 FM)Car (mg g−1 FM)Ratio Chl a/Chl bRatio Total Chl/Car
Control0.27.54 ± 0.13 Ca2.10 ± 0.05 Ca9.64 ± 0.19 Ca1.41 ± 0.11 Ca3.59 ± 0.08 Ab6.84 ± 0.21 Ab
Control1.08.27 ± 0.21 Ba2.33 ± 0.07 Ba10.60 ± 0.22 Ba2.30 ± 0.12 Ba3.55 ± 0.08 Ab4.61 ± 0.18 Bb
Control3.08.77 ± 0.23 Aa2.53 ± 0.08 Aa11.30 ± 0.25 Aa2.65 ± 0.14 Aa3.47 ± 0.06 Ab4.26 ± 0.13 Cb
Excess0.27.27 ± 0.06 Cb1.60 ± 0.03 Cb8.87 ± 0.12 Cb1.12 ± 0.08 Cb4.54 ± 0.07 Aa7.92 ± 0.28 Aa
Excess1.07.73 ± 0.09 Bb1.71 ± 0.04 Bb9.44 ± 0.15 Bb1.34 ± 0.09 Bb4.52 ± 0.07 Aa7.04 ± 0.23 Ba
Excess3.08.03 ± 0.11 Ab1.80 ± 0.04 Ab9.83 ± 0.19 Ab1.57 ± 0.10 Ab4.46 ± 0.08 Aa6.26 ± 0.22 Ca

Chl a = chlorophyll a; Chl b = chlorophyll b; Total chl = total chlorophyll; Car = carotenoids. Columns with different uppercase letters between Ni supplies (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 under equal Fe supply) and lowercase letters between Fe supplies (control and Fe excess under equal Ni supply) indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Means ± SD. n = 5.

Table 4: Gas exchange of soybean plants exposed to Fe excess and different Ni supplies.

Fe SupplyNi Supply (mg kg−1)PN (μmol m−2 s−1)gs (mmol m−2 s−1)E (mol m−2 s−1)Ci (μmol mol−1)WUE (μmol mmol−1)PN/Ci (μmol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
Control0.210.64 ± 0.33 Ba0.18 ± 0.01 Ba2.47 ± 0.17 Aa266 ± 2 Ab4.31 ± 0.09 Ba0.040 ± 0.001 Ca
Control1.011.30 ± 0.40 Ba0.20 ± 0.01 Ba2.57 ± 0.19 Aa259 ± 4 Ba4.40 ± 0.15 Ba0.044 ± 0.002 Ba
Control3.012.78 ± 0.54 Aa0.25 ± 0.02 Aa2.68 ± 0.13 Aa244 ± 3 Cb4.77 ± 0.18 Aa0.052 ± 0.004 Aa
Excess0.27.44 ± 0.26 Cb0.15 ± 0.01 Bb2.21 ± 0.14 Aa282 ± 9 Aa3.37 ± 0.05 Cb0.026 ± 0.001 Cb
Excess1.08.19 ± 0.29 Bb0.17 ± 0.01 Bb2.31 ± 0.18 Aa264 ± 6 Ba3.55 ± 0.07 Bb0.031 ± 0.002 Bb
Excess3.09.50 ± 0.34 Ab0.21 ± 0.01 Ab2.44 ± 0.16 Aa266 ± 5 Ba3.89 ± 0.14 Ab0.036 ± 0.002 Ab

PN = net photosynthetic rate; gs = stomatal conductance; E = transpiration rate; Ci = intercellular CO2 concentration; WUE = water-use efficiency; PN/Ci = carboxylation instantaneous efficiency. Columns with different uppercase letters between Ni supplies (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 under equal Fe supply) and lowercase letters between Fe supplies (control and Fe excess under equal Ni supply) indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Means ± SD. n = 5.

3.3 Ni Mitigates Oxidative Stress Caused by Fe Excess

Treatment with Ni reduced the oxidative damage occasioned by Fe excess in soybean plants. However, there were reductions (p < 0.05) of 6% and 3% in MDA and H2O2, as compared to Fe excess +0.2 mg kg−1 Ni (Fig. 1). For antioxidant metabolism (Fig. 2), application of 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni caused increases in APX (16%) and CAT (14%), when compared to Fe excess without Ni applied.

images

Figure 1: Malondialdehyde (MDA, A) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, B) in soybean plants exposed to Fe excess and different Ni supplies. Columns with different uppercase letters between Ni supplies (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 under equal Fe supply) and lowercase letters between Fe supplies (control and Fe excess under equal Ni supply) indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Means ± SD, n = 5.

images

Figure 2: Catalase (CAT, A) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX, B) in soybean plants exposed to Fe excess and different Ni supplies. Columns with different uppercase letters between Ni supplies (0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg kg−1 under equal Fe supply) and lowercase letters between Fe supplies (control and Fe excess under equal Ni supply) indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Means ± SD, n = 5.

4 Discussion

Fe excess caused reductions in the biomass accumulation of soybean plants; however, the application of 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni mitigated the damage to growth. Ni acts as a cofactor of the enzyme urease, which decomposes urea into CO2 and NH3, playing a crucial role in nitrogen metabolism in legumes [41]. The improvement in growth may also be related to the presence of Ni as a structural component in biological nitrogen fixation, which facilitates the development of the root system, enhances nutritional status, promotes biological N2 fixation, and regulates N metabolism [42,43]. Ni assimilation can be associated with lower Fe uptake by root cells, mitigating the harmful effects of excess Fe on plant growth [44], because both micronutrients are antagonistic and absorbed by the same transporter, called IRT1 (iron-related transporter 1) [45]. Corroborating this research, linear increases in the dry matter of common bean plants and a maximum increase of 28% with Ni (60 g ha−1) [46]. In a study evaluating the effects of different levels of Ni (0, 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 mg L−1) on growth of sweet potato, observed that biomass was improved with the Ni treatment, increasing LDM (14% and 56%) and RDM (12% and 35%) with treatments using 7.5 and 15 mg L−1 Ni, respectively [47].

Fe excess caused reductions in photosynthetic pigments of soybean plants, with negative impacts on chlorophyll biosynthesis [48] and essential reactions in photosynthetic machinery [49] due to ROS overproduction [50]. The decreases in Chl a, Chl b, and Total Chl are related to the increase in MDA content in Fe-stressed plants, given that this is an indicator of lipid peroxidation in cells in the presence of free radicals [51,52]. Oxidative damage resulting from toxic levels of Fe and its effects on photosynthetic variables in rice cultivars, detecting a reduction in pigment indices in the BR IRGA 409 cultivar, after seven days of application of the treatments [53].

Soybean plants treated with 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni had increases in pigment levels in the Fe excess condition, which shows that Ni attenuated further changes in chloroplasts. Ni plays an essential role in nitrogen metabolism and biological nitrogen fixation in soybean plants [52], participating in numerous enzymatic metabolic activities, such as urease, which facilitates the assimilation and metabolism of nitrogen [53], a constituent of the chlorophyll molecule. Similar to our results, different nickel concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mg kg−1) on nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in cowpea plants resulted in increases in the contents of Chl a, Chl b, and Total Chl [54]. Low concentrations of Ni2+ in Spirulina platensis plants resulted in a significant increase in Chl a and Car values, whereas higher concentrations of Ni2+ suppressed the levels of these pigments [55].

Fe is an essential element to the electron transport during the photosynthesis process, but is also responsible for its toxic effects when in excess [55], resulting from degradation of the cell membrane [56] due to the presence of free radicals and excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [56]. In rice cultivation, low stomatal conductance has been reported under Fe toxic conditions [57] and near-zero transpiration rates [58]. Reductions in PN and decreased gs were detected, being explained by oxidative damage from Fe toxicity on the photosynthetic apparatus [59]. Increased Ni supplementation provided benefits for gas exchange and mitigated the phytotoxic effect of Fe overexposure. In conditions of Fe excess and Ni increase, an adequate dose can benefit the higher activity of the photosynthetic apparatus, specifically photosystem II, which contributes to the reaction center of oxygenic photosynthesis [24]. Physiological performance of cotton plants exposed to different concentrations of Ni (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 mg dm−3) in the soil to varying stages of development was studied, being obtained the maximum point for PN, gs, and E obtained in the treatment with 45 mg dm−3 [60].

The increase in MDA and H2O2, with excess Fe, is a natural plant response to stress. H2O2 can produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the presence of Fe2+, which is catalyzed by Fe itself, promoting a reaction that contributes to lipid peroxidation [61]. Increases in MDA concentrations have also been detected in rice exposed to toxic levels of Fe [62]. Ni application minimized free radical production and lipid peroxidation. High MDA levels are primary indicators of damage associated with ROS, resulting from the destabilization of membrane integrity and functionality, with subsequent adverse effects on cytoplasmic ion balance [6]. Increases in CAT and APX activities and reduction in MDA and H2O2 contents, when salicylic acid was applied simultaneously with Ni ions in Brassica napus, attributing the reversal of oxidative stress to the Ni molecule [63]. Similar results, a study evaluating the effect of foliar Ni supply in alleviating cellular damage and photosynthesis impairment resulting from infection of soybean plants by P. pachyrhizi, in which the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA was less pronounced when Ni applied in plants, compared to plants without Ni, indicating less cellular damage induced by Ni [64].

Fe stress caused reductions in enzyme activities. Fe excess induces oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in plant cells [65]. As a strategy to regulate the redox system, plants detoxify ROS by enhancing enzyme activities [66]. However, treatment with 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni reestablished the redox balance, improving the activity of CAT and APX enzymes. Ni participates in several physiological, biochemical, and morphological processes in plants, among which it acts indirectly on the activity of antioxidant enzymes [67]. In plants subjected to stress levels, CAT and APX act in the detoxification of ROS, which are highly toxic substances for plant metabolism [68,69]. H2O2, a substrate of CAT and APX, is converted into H2O and O2. Thus, enzymatic activity varies as a function of H2O2 levels [15,70]. Similar results, research with two tomato genotypes, pretreated with Ni (15 and 30 mg L−1) and under salt stress, significantly increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes (CAT and APX) [70].

5 Conclusion

This study showed that Fe excess reduced the gas exchange, mainly photosynthesis, of soybean plants. However, the application of 3.0 mg kg−1 Ni was able to attenuate the negative effects, reflecting in the biomass. Stress indicators (hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde) were drastically reduced by Ni applied in plants under Fe excess. Fe stress caused destruction and delayed biosynthesis of chloroplastic pigments, and reduced the biomass, more specifically of leaf and stem. However, treatment with Ni clearly activated plant defense mechanisms, inducing positive responses on growth, as validated by the increments in catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities. The Ni application via soil under experimental conditions was promoted as a possible attenuator for the phytotoxic effects provoked by Fe excess in soybean plants.

Acknowledgement: Not applicable.

Funding Statement: This research had financial support from Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas (FAPESPA/Brazil), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científco e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brazil), and Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA/Brazil) to Elaine Maria Silva Guedes Lobato and Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato.

Author Contributions: Elaine Maria Silva Guedes Lobato and Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato were advisors for this project, planned all phases of the research, and critically revised the manuscript. Elizeu Monteiro Pereira Júnior, Lorena de Souza Cunha, Andreza Sousa Carmo, Ana Clara Lucarini and Ynglety Cascaes Pereira Matos conducted the experiment in the greenhouse and performed physiological, biochemical, nutritional and morphological determinations, as well as it wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Corresponding Author, Elaine Maria Silva Guedes Lobato, upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval: Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

APX Ascorbate peroxidase
CAR Carotenoids
CAT Catalase
Chl a Chlorophyll a
Chl b Chlorophyll b
Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration
CO2 Carbon dioxide
E Transpiration rate
Fe Iron
gs Stomatal conductance
H2O2 Hydrogen peroxide
LDM Leaf dry matter
MDA Malondialdehyde
PN Net photosynthetic rate
PN/Ci Instantaneous carboxylation efficiency
RDM Root dry matter
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SDM Stem dry matter
TDM Total dry matter
Total Chl Total chlorophyll
WUE Water-use efficiency

References

1. CONAB Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento . Grãos. Safra 2022/23. Acompan da Safra Bras. 2023; 10: 117. [Google Scholar]

2. Liu S , Zhang P , Marley B , Liu W . The factors affecting farmers’ soybean planting behavior in Heilongjiang Province, China. Agriculture. 2019; 9( 9): 188. doi:10.3390/agriculture9090188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

3. Cruz SCS , Sena DG Jr , Aires dos Santos DM , Lunezzo LO , Machado CG . Cultivo de Soja Sob diferentes densidades de semeadura e arranjos espaciais. Rev Agric Neotrop. 2016; 3( 1): 1– 6. doi:10.32404/rean.v3i1.431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

4. Pollnow HE , Pimentel JR , Troyjack C , Peter M , Medeiros LB , Peter M , et al. Manejo da adubação de base em Soja no Noroeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Braz J Dev. 2020; 6( 6): 38913– 23. doi:10.34117/bjdv6n6-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

5. Domingos CS , Lima LHS , Braccini AL . Nutrição mineral e ferramentas para o manejo da adubação na cultura da Soja. Sci Agrar Paranaensis. 2015; 14( 3): 132– 40. doi:10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v14n3p132-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

6. Shahzad B , Tanveer M , Rehman A , Cheema SA , Fahad S , Rehman S , et al. Nickel; whether toxic or essential for plants and environment—a review. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 132: 641– 51. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.10.014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

7. de Macedo FG , Bresolin JD , Santos EF , Furlan F , Lopes da Silva WT , Polacco JC , et al. Nickel availability in soil as influenced by liming and its role in soybean nitrogen metabolism. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1358. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

8. de Carvalho Braga Levy C , Mellis EV , Murrer MK , Inglés CR , Daynes CN , Cavalli E , et al. Effects of nickel fertilization on soybean growth in tropical soils. Bragantia. 2019; 78( 3): 432– 43. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.20180242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

9. Seregin IV , Kozhevnikova AD . Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2006; 53( 2): 257– 77. doi:10.1134/s1021443706020178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

10. Franco GDC . Tratamento de sementes de Soja com níquel para o aumento da fixação biológica e atividade da urease [ dissertation]. São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo; 2015. [Google Scholar]

11. Ahmad MSA , Ashraf M , Hussain M . Phytotoxic effects of nickel on yield and concentration of macro- and micro-nutrients in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) achenes. J Hazard Mater. 2011; 185( 2–3): 1295– 303. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

12. Mao X , Ahmad B , Hussain S , Azeem F , Waseem M , Alhaj Hamoud Y , et al. Microbial assisted alleviation of nickel toxicity in plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025; 289: 117669. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

13. Xie K , Cakmak I , Wang S , Zhang F , Guo S . Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between potassium and magnesium in higher plants. Crop J. 2021; 9( 2): 249– 56. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2020.10.005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

14. Abou Seeda MA , El-Sayed AA , Yassen AA , Abou El-Nour EAA , Zaghloul SM , Gad Mervat M . Nickel, iron and their diverse role in plants: a review, approaches and future prospective. Middle East J Appl Sci. 2020; 10: 196– 219. doi:10.36632/mejas/2020.10.2.21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

15. Delias DS , Da-Silva CJ , Martins AC , de Oliveira DSC , do Amarante L . Iron toxicity increases oxidative stress and impairs mineral accumulation and leaf gas exchange in soybean plants during hypoxia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29( 15): 22427– 38. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17397-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

16. Wood BW . Iron-induced nickel deficiency in pecan. HortScience. 2013; 48( 9): 1145– 53. doi:10.21273/hortsci.48.9.1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

17. Riadi M . Response of low nickel fertilization on the quantitative parameters of shallot under hydroponic conditions. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2024; 56( 4): 1661– 8. doi:10.54910/sabrao2024.56.4.31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

18. Garcia-Molina A , Marino G , Lehmann M , Leister D . Systems biology of responses to simultaneous copper and iron deficiency in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2020; 103( 6): 2119– 38. doi:10.1111/tpj.14887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

19. de Carvalho IF , Alves PB , Ferreira TC , dos Santos BS , Cozin BB , de Souza RP , et al. Effects of iron and copper on emergence and physiology of Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC. Rev Caatinga. 2025; 38: e12686. doi:10.1590/1983-21252025v3812686rc. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

20. Souza LH , Novais RF , Alvarez VVH , de Albuquerque Villani EM . Efeito do pH do solo rizosférico e não rizosférico de plantas de Soja inoculadas com Bradyrhizobium japonicum na absorção de boro, cobre, ferro, manganês e zinco. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 2010; 34( 5): 1641– 52. doi:10.1590/s0100-06832010000500017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

21. Yusuf M , Fariduddin Q , Hayat S , Ahmad A . Nickel: an overview of uptake, essentiality and toxicity in plants. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011; 86( 1): 1– 17. doi:10.1007/s00128-010-0171-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

22. Callegari DM , do Carmo Silva B , dos Santos LR , Pereira EM , Batista BL , da Silva Lobato AK , et al. Physiological, biochemical and nutritional aspects in Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (Huber ex Ducke) plants under different zinc supplies. Braz J Bot. 2022; 45( 3): 845– 55. doi:10.1007/s40415-022-00812-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

23. Rodrigues TE , Silva RDC , Da Silva JML , De Oliveira Junior RC , Gama JRNF , Valente MA , et al. Caracterização e classificação dos solos do município de Paragominas, estado do Pará. Brasília, Brazil: Embrapa; 2003. [Google Scholar]

24. Freitas DS , Rodak BW , Carneiro MAC , Guilherme LRG . How does Ni fertilization affect a responsive soybean genotype? A dose study. Plant Soil. 2019; 441( 1): 567– 86. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04146-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

25. Aung MS , Masuda H , Kobayashi T , Nishizawa NK . Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of responses to different levels of iron excess stress in various rice tissues. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2018; 64( 3): 370– 85. doi:10.1080/00380768.2018.1443754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

26. Wallihan EF , Bradford GR . Simplified methods for inducing micronutrient deficiencies1. HortScience. 1977; 12( 4): 327– 8. doi:10.21273/hortsci.12.4.327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

27. Fehr WR , Caviness CE . Stages of soybean development. Spec Rep. 1977; 1–12. [Google Scholar]

28. Melich A . Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, NH4, short test methods used in soil testing division. Raleigh, NC, USA: Department of Agriculture; 1953. [Google Scholar]

29. Paniz FP , Pedron T , Freire BM , Torres DP , Silva FF , Batista BL . Effective procedures for the determination of As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, Th, Zn, U and rare earth elements in plants and foodstuffs. Anal Methods. 2018; 10( 33): 4094– 103. doi:10.1039/c8ay01295d. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

30. Pereira YC , Rodrigues WS , Lima EJA , Santos LR , Silva MHL , Lobato AKS . Brassinosteroids increase electron transport and photosynthesis in soybean plants under water deficit. Photosynthetica. 2019; 57( 1): 181– 91. doi:10.32615/ps.2019.029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

31. Wu QS , Xia RX , Zou YN . Reactive oxygen metabolism in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings subjected to water stress. J Plant Physiol. 2006; 163( 11): 1101– 10. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

32. Velikova V , Yordanov I , Edreva A . Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000; 151( 1): 59– 66. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

33. Cakmak I , Horst WJ . Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiol Plant. 1991; 83( 3): 463– 8. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb00121.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

34. Gong M , Li YJ , Chen SZ . Abscisic acid-induced thermotolerance in maize seedlings is mediated by calcium and associated with antioxidant systems. J Plant Physiol. 1998; 153( 3–4): 488– 96. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80179-X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

35. Lichtenthaler HK , Buschmann C . Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Curr Protoc Food Anal Chem. 2001; 1( 1): F4.3.1– 8. doi:10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

36. Hamid Badawi G , Yamauchi Y , Shimada E , Sasaki R , Kawano N , Tanaka K , et al. Enhanced tolerance to salt stress and water deficit by overexpressing superoxide dismutase in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) chloroplasts. Plant Sci. 2004; 166( 4): 919– 28. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.12.007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

37. Bradford MM . A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248– 54. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

38. Havir EA , McHale NA . Biochemical and developmental characterization of multiple forms of catalase in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987; 84( 2): 450– 5. doi:10.1104/pp.84.2.450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

39. Nakano Y , Asada K . Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981; 22( 5): 867– 80. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

40. SAS Institute Inc . The SAS-System for Windows Release 6.11 (Software). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]

41. de Chihuahua UA , de Jesús Rodríguez-Jiménez T , Ojeda-Barrios DL , de Chihuahua UA , Blanco-Macías F , Chapingo UA , et al. Ureasa y níquel en la fisiología de las plantas. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic. 2016; XXII( 2): 69– 81. doi:10.5154/r.rchsh.2014.11.051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

42. Li Y , Liu Q , Zhang DX , Zhang ZY , Xu A , Jiang YL , et al. Metal nutrition and transport in the process of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Plant Commun. 2024; 5( 4): 100829. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

43. Rodak BW , Freitas DS , Rossi ML , Linhares FS , Moro E , Campos CNS , et al. A study on nickel application methods for optimizing soybean growth. Sci Rep. 2024; 14( 1): 10556. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58149-w. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

44. Costa DF , Machado VJ , Soares LH , Fagan EB , dos Reis MR , Cabral EMA . Utilização de níquel na cultura da soja. Cerrado Agrociências. 2015; 6: 31– 44. [Google Scholar]

45. Nishida S , Aisu A , Mizuno T . Induction of IRT1 by the nickel-induced iron-deficient response in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2012; 7( 3): 329– 31. doi:10.4161/psb.19263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

46. Lopes JF , Coelho FC , Rabello WS , Rangel OJP , de Amaral Gravina G , Vieira HD . Produtividade e composição mineral do feijão em resposta às adubações com molibdênio e níquel. Rev Ceres. 2016; 63( 3): 419– 26. doi:10.1590/0034-737x201663030020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

47. Kumar S , Wang M , Liu Y , Fahad S , Qayyum A , Jadoon SA , et al. Nickel toxicity alters growth patterns and induces oxidative stress response in sweetpotato. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 1054924. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1054924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

48. Müller C , Kuki KN , Pinheiro DT , de Souza LR , Siqueira Silva AI , Loureiro ME , et al. Differential physiological responses in rice upon exposure to excess distinct iron forms. Plant Soil. 2015; 391( 1): 123– 38. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2405-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

49. Xu S , Lin D , Sun H , Yang X , Zhang X . Excess iron alters the fatty acid composition of chloroplast membrane and decreases the photosynthesis rate: a study in hydroponic pea seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015; 37( 10): 212. doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1969-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

50. Neves NR , Oliva MA , da Cruz Centeno D , Costa AC , Ribas RF , Pereira EG . Photosynthesis and oxidative stress in the restinga plant species Eugenia uniflora L. exposed to simulated acid rain and iron ore dust deposition: potential use in environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407( 12): 3740– 5. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

51. Skórzyńska-Polit E . Lipid peroxidation in plant cells, its physiological role and changes under heavy metal stress. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2011; 76( 1): 49– 54. doi:10.5586/asbp.2007.006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

52. Turhadi T , Hamim H , Ghulamahdi M , Miftahudin M . Iron toxicity-induced physiological and metabolite profile variations among tolerant and sensitive rice varieties. Plant Signal Behav. 2019; 14( 12): 1682829. doi:10.1080/15592324.2019.1682829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

53. de Souza Pinto S , de Souza AE , Oliva MA , Pereira EG . Oxidative damage and photosynthetic impairment in tropical rice cultivars upon exposure to excess iron. Sci Agric. 2016; 73( 3): 217– 26. doi:10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

54. Mendes NAC , Cunha MLO , Bosse MA , Silva VM , Moro AL , Agathokleous E , et al. Physiological and biochemical role of nickel in nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023; 201: 107869. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

55. Kaamoush M , El-Agawany N , El Salhin H , El-Zeiny A . Monitoring effect of nickel, copper, and zinc on growth and photosynthetic pigments of Spirulina platensis with suitability investigation in Idku Lake. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29( 52): 78942– 59. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21328-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

56. Verma L , Pandey N . Effect of iron stress on oxidative metabolism in wheat plants (Triticum aestivum (L).): iron stress in wheat. Int J Appl Pure Sci Agric. 2016; 2: 24– 32. [Google Scholar]

57. Dufey I , Hakizimana P , Draye X , Lutts S , Bertin P . QTL mapping for biomass and physiological parameters linked to resistance mechanisms to ferrous iron toxicity in rice. Euphytica. 2009; 167( 2): 143– 60. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9870-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

58. Onyango DA , Entila F , Dida MM , Ismail AM , Drame KN . Mechanistic understanding of iron toxicity tolerance in contrasting rice varieties from Africa: 1. Morpho-physiological and biochemical responses. Funct Plant Biol. 2018; 46( 1): 93– 105. doi:10.1071/fp18129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

59. Pereira EG , Oliva MA , Rosado-Souza L , Mendes GC , Santos Colares D , Stopato CH , et al. Iron excess affects rice photosynthesis through stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. Plant Sci. 2013; 201–202: 81– 92. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.12.003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

60. Aguilar JV , Ferreira TC , Bomfim NCP , Mendes TFS , de Marcos Lapaz A , Brambilla MR , et al. Different responses to phenological stages: a role for nickel in growth and physiology of herbaceous cotton. Plant Growth Regul. 2023; 101( 3): 663– 78. doi:10.1007/s10725-023-01048-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

61. Tadaiesky LBA , da Silva BRS , Batista BL , Lobato AKDS . Brassinosteroids trigger tolerance to iron toxicity in rice. Physiol Plant. 2021; 171( 3): 371– 87. doi:10.1111/ppl.13230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

62. Wu LB , Ueda Y , Lai SK , Frei M . Shoot tolerance mechanisms to iron toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2017; 40( 4): 570– 84. doi:10.1111/pce.12733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

63. Kazemi N , Ali Khavari-Nejad R , Fahimi H , Saadatmand S , Nejad-Sattari T . Effects of exogenous salicylic acid and nitric oxide on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of Brassica napus L. under nickel stress. Sci Hortic. 2010; 126( 3): 402– 7. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

64. Einhardt AM , Ferreira S , Souza GMF , Mochko ACR , Rodrigues FA . Cellular oxidative damage and impairment on the photosynthetic apparatus caused by Asian Soybean Rust on soybeans are alleviated by nickel. Acta Physiol Plant. 2020; 42( 7): 115. doi:10.1007/s11738-020-03108-x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

65. Kabir AH , Begum MC , Haque A , Amin R , Swaraz AM , Ali Haider S , et al. Genetic variation in Fe toxicity tolerance is associated with the regulation of translocation and chelation of iron along with antioxidant defence in shoots of rice. Funct Plant Biol. 2016; 43( 11): 1070– 81. doi:10.1071/FP16068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

66. Das U , Rahman MM , Roy ZR , Rahman MM , Kabir AH . Morpho-physiological retardations due to iron toxicity involve redox imbalance rather than photosynthetic damages in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 156: 55– 63. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

67. Ameen N , Amjad M , Murtaza B , Abbas G , Shahid M , Imran M , et al. Biogeochemical behavior of nickel under different abiotic stresses: toxicity and detoxification mechanisms in plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26( 11): 10496– 514. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04540-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

68. Liu Y , Zhao Z , Si J , Di C , Han J , An L . Brassinosteroids alleviate chilling-induced oxidative damage by enhancing antioxidant defense system in suspension cultured cells of Chorispora bungeana. Plant Growth Regul. 2009; 59( 3): 207– 14. doi:10.1007/s10725-009-9405-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

69. Dalyan E , Yüzbaşıoğlu E , Akpınar I . Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on antioxidative defence system against lead-induced oxidative stress in the roots of Brassica juncea L. seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2018; 65( 4): 570– 8. doi:10.1134/s1021443718040118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

70. Subhani MA , Amjad M , Iqbal MM , Murtaza B , Imran M , Naeem MA , et al. Nickel toxicity pretreatment attenuates salt stress by activating antioxidative system and ion homeostasis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.): an interplay from mild to severe stress. Environ Geochem Health. 2023; 45( 1): 227– 46. doi:10.1007/s10653-022-01336-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

×

Cite This Article

APA Style
Monteiro Pereira Júnior, E., de Souza Cunha, L., Sousa Carmo, A., Clara Lucarini, A., Cascaes Pereira Matos, Y. et al. (2026). Nickel Enhances Soybean Growth and Resilience to Iron Stress by Improving Gas Exchange and Antioxidant Metabolism. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 95(5), 15. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.072138
Vancouver Style
Monteiro Pereira Júnior E, de Souza Cunha L, Sousa Carmo A, Clara Lucarini A, Cascaes Pereira Matos Y, Klynger da Silva Lobato A, et al. Nickel Enhances Soybean Growth and Resilience to Iron Stress by Improving Gas Exchange and Antioxidant Metabolism. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 2026;95(5):15. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.072138
IEEE Style
E. Monteiro Pereira Júnior et al., “Nickel Enhances Soybean Growth and Resilience to Iron Stress by Improving Gas Exchange and Antioxidant Metabolism,” Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot., vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 15, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.072138


cc Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 193

    View

  • 64

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link