iconOpen Access

REVIEW

Fungi for Future Farming: Enhancing Nutrient Uptake and Stress Resilience in Sustainable Development Era

Kallol Das1,*, Aniruddha Sarker2, Deen Mohammad Deepo3, F. M. Aminuzzaman4, Abu Bakar Siddique5, Saifullah Omar Nasif6, Ramadan A. Arafa7

1 College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
2 Interdisciplinary Institute for Food Security (IIFS), Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
3 Institute of Seed Technology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
4 Department of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
5 Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, Launceston, TAS, Australia
6 Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
7 Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

* Corresponding Authors: Kallol Das. Email: email, email

(This article belongs to the Special Issue: Technological Advances for Sustainable Management and Biological Control of Plant Pests and Diseases)

Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2026, 95(7), 3 https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.079822

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) are a diverse group of non-pathogenic fungi that benefit host plants through multiple mechanisms. With the growing global emphasis on sustainable agriculture, research has increasingly focused on understanding fungal ecology and its role in enhancing plant growth and development. PGPF contributes significantly by facilitating nutrient acquisition, solubilizing minerals, producing growth hormones, and transferring essential elements from the soil to plants. PGPF have been proposed as biofertilizers, bio-stimulants, and/or biocontrol agents for a variety of plant species in earlier research findings. Modern biotechnological tools can help uncover plant-PGPF interactions, facilitating the development of crop-specific bioinoculants. This review critically evaluates PGPF as drivers of sustainable agriculture by bridging mechanistic insights with field-level applications. Unlike previous descriptive reviews, this study integrates nutrient acquisition, stress resilience mechanisms, and real-world efficacy under varying environmental conditions. We highlight the role of PGPF in climate-resilient cropping systems and circular bioeconomy frameworks, including waste valorization and biofertilizer development. Furthermore, we identify key limitations such as host specificity, environmental variability, and scalability challenges. Finally, future research directions including omics-driven inoculant design and microbiome engineering are proposed. This review provides a novel, integrative perspective on the application of PGPF in sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

Bio-stimulants; microorganisms; nutrient acquisition; PGPF; sustainable agriculture; stress management

1 Introduction

Since 2010, the global population has exceeded 7 billion and continues to rise rapidly. With an annual increase of approximately 83 million people, projections indicate that by 2050, the population will reach 9.7 billion—24% higher than in 2023 [1]. To meet the growing food demand, agricultural production must increase by 25–70% over current levels [2]. Intensifying agriculture is often considered a solution to this challenge. One promising approach involves harnessing plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs), which naturally inhabit the rhizosphere and enhance plant productivity. The rhizosphere is the soil region surrounding plant roots with the greatest biological activity [3]. However, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins such as Phytoalexins, and plant defensive chitinase are a few examples of active defense mechanisms that plants have against pathogen attacks, as well as cell wall fortification and build-up of such sub-stances [4]. Furthermore, PR-gene expression can be induced by several plant pathogen-derived chemicals. The biocontrol approach has piqued the interest of experts due to its environmentally friendly defense against plant diseases and safety features [5]. Plant growth promoting fungi (PGPF) are soil fungi that dwell in the root zone and are either directly or indirectly involved in encouraging plant growth by secreting a variety of inhibitory and antagonistic compounds into the rhizosphere [6].

According to Hawksworth and Lucking, fungi are an essential component of the plant microbiome and range in species from 2.2 to 3.8 million [7]. They also generate a large amount of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are important in the network of interactions between two organisms [8,9]. Fungi are the only organisms to produce dozens to hundreds of various VOCs, including alcohols, aldehydes, acids, ethers, esters, ketones, hydrocarbons, terpenes, and sulfur compounds [10]. PGPF promotes plant development through multiple mechanisms, making it difficult to attribute their effects to a single pathway. Mineral solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, volatile organic compound generation, microbial enzyme utilization, increased nutrient uptake, abiotic stress amelioration, and phytopathogen suppression are just a few direct and indirect methods. An ideal PGPF formulation should be cost-effective, work with currently available application technologies, protect biological actives from stress, ensure viability, remain unaffected after storage in ambient conditions, and ensure microbiological actives in the field [11].

Despite extensive research on PGPF, a critical gap exists between laboratory-based mechanistic studies and their performance under field conditions. Environmental variability, soil heterogeneity, and microbial competition often limit the reproducibility of experimental findings. Microorganisms also inhabiting the rhizosphere can affect plant growth through a range of direct and indirect mechanisms (Table 1). Moreover, the integration of PGPF into climate-resilient agriculture and circular bioeconomy systems remains underexplored. Therefore, this review aims to bridge these gaps by critically synthesizing mechanistic understanding with applied outcomes and identifying future research priorities.

Table 1: List of potential PGPF in plant nutrition enhancement.

PGPF StrainsImprovementPlant SpeciesReferences
Beauveria bassianaEnhanced spike production
Strengthen the root sett
Wheat
Sugarcane
[12,13]
Purpureocillium lilacinumImproved yieldTomato[14]
Metarhizium brunneumBiomass, leaf area, nitrogen, and phosphorus were increasedPotato[15]
Beauveria bassiana, Isaria fumosorosea, Metarhizium brunneumPositive impact on survival, growth, health, length, and cabbage’s dry massCabbage[16]
Syncephalastrum racemosum; Paecilomyces lilacinusEnhanced cucumber yield, promoted root and shoot lengthCucumber[17]
Beauveria bassiana; Metarhizium brunneumGrowth promotionFaba bean[18]
Beauveria bassiana; Purpureocillium lilacinumImprovement of plant growthCotton[19]
Metarhizium robertsiiPlant root development and root hair proliferationSwitchgrass, Haricot beans[20]
Metarhizium anisopliaeEnhanced plant height, root length, and dry weight of the shoot and rootTomato[21]
Clonostachys roseaA better emergence process and timeCarrot, Onion[22]
Trichoderma harzianum30% more seedlings emerged. Decreased F. verticillioides and fumonisin incidence and increased field emergence Enhanced establishment of plant standsCucumber, Maize, Rice[23,24,25]
T. virideA rise in the weight of new shootsArabidopsis, Tomato[26]
Fusarium oxysporumBoth fresh and dry shoots increased by 85%Arabidopsis, Tobacco[27]
Aspergillus spp.Increased fresh, dry biomass, and shoot lengthCucumber[28]
Fusarium spp.Lengthened roots, fresh roots, and dried rootsIndian spinach[28]
Penicillium spp.Longer and more biomass-producing rootsSesame[29]
T. longibrachiatumIncreased soluble sugar and protein contentWheat[30]
Pochonia chlamydosporiaHastened blossoming processTomato[31]
Phoma sp.Root-shoot growth, incresed crop productionCucumber[32]
Exophiala sp.Drought and salinity-induced plant growthCucumber[33]
Chaetomium globosumBiomass and root-shoot developmentCapsicum[34]
Cladosporium sp.Increased root-shoots, chlorophyll, soluble carbohydratesTobacco[35]

2 Plant Growth Promoting Fungi

The microorganisms that reside in the rhizosphere can influence plant growth in a variety of ways, both direct and indirect (Table 1). Plant interactions with a range of microorganisms, particularly rhizosphere bacteria and fungi, can result in changes in plant metabolism and an increase in plant vigor, growth, and development as well as stress tolerance [36]. The PGPF is a type of rhizospheric fungi that colonizes plant roots and stimulates plant growth [37]. Nonpathogenic saprotroph fungi are a broad group of organisms. According to the published literature, most true fungi classified as PGPF belong to the phylum Ascomycota (Aspergillus, Aureobasidium, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Colletotrichum, Exophiala, Penicillium, Trichoderma, Fusarium, Gliocladium, Phoma, Phomopsis, Purpureocillium), but a small number [38]. For example, cucumbers exhibit systemic resistance to various diseases due to colonization by PGPF species [39]. PGPF are soil-dwelling non-pathogenic saprophytes that aid many crop plants by protecting them from disease and promoting plant growth [40,41].

Current literature shows a strong bias toward well-studied genera such as Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Penicillium, while many ecologically significant fungi remain underexplored. This bias may limit our understanding of the full potential of fungal diversity in sustainable agriculture. Additionally, Table 1 reveals that most studies focus on a narrow range of crops, indicating a need for broader crop-specific investigations.

Factors such as temperature, pH, soil type, moisture, and microbial diversity influence the effectiveness of fungal biofertilizers [42]. Numerous biological control agents create a variety of antibiotics or non-specific metabolites that, through a process known as antibiosis, either suppress or eradicate harmful bacteria. When combined with cell wall-degrading enzymes, these antibiotics synergistically inhibit various plant pathogens [43]. It is commonly known that the Penicillium, Gliocladium, and Trichoderma species produce a wide array of antibiotics and treat disease in various ways [44].

Another tactic used by biological control agents to lessen plant disease is mycoparasitism [45]. Additionally, the high iron affinity of the siderophore produced by the PGPF and the intense competition for iron in the rhizosphere should have an impact on the iron feeding of other soil species, such as plant diseases [46]. Aspergillus, Piriformospora, Fusarium, Penicillium, Phoma, Rhizoctonia, and Trichoderma are well-known nonpathogenic fungal genera that promote various plant characteristics beneficial for increased yields [19,47]. Endophytes, ectomycorrhizas (EcM), arbuscular mycorrhizae (AMF), yeasts, Trichoderma sp., and several avirulent strains of phytopathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum, Cryphonectria parasitica, and Muscodor albus are some examples of PGPF exhibiting BCA activity [48]. These helpful fungi have been created in vast quantities and used extensively to treat plant disease [49]. Thus, the use of plant-beneficial microorganisms in agriculture as biofertilizers, biopesticides, and for phytoremediation is of great interest [50,51].

The identification of PGPF began with rhizosphere fungi. According to recent studies, phyllosphere fungi have PGPF potential. The phyllosphere, which is made up of plant above-ground surfaces, is one of the most prevalent microbial homes on Earth. Fungi in the phyllosphere can work with plants to help them develop and survive environmental obstacles [52].

Plant growth promotion by PGPF is a complex process that is not always explained by a single mechanism. Both direct and indirect mechanisms are known to influence plant growth and development for agricultural improvement. Direct growth promotion occurs when fungi produce chemicals or make nutrients readily available to plants. On the other hand, PGPF demonstrates fungal ability to manage plant diseases and alleviate stress, which are two of the most important indirect techniques for stimulating plant development (Fig. 1). A specific PGPF may influence plant growth and development by using one or more of these methods [53].

In addition to promoting plant growth and development, numerous microorganisms that co-exist in contact with plant roots have been successfully employed to induce resistance in host plants against the encroaching phytopathogens [54]. Non-pathogenic, naturally occurring saprophytes called plant growth-promoting fungi serve to maintain soil fertility, which in turn promotes plant development and triggers the first line of defense against pathogen infections [53,55]. The ability of PGPF in case of roots to colonize the soil is thought to be the first and most important mechanism for preventing pathogen infection. It also helps to intake nutrients, which promotes plant growth [53,56]. Because of the profoundly beneficial benefits of PGPF in agriculture, researchers have focused their attention on the application of PGPF for the induction of resistance and improvement of plant growth by activating induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants [56,57].

images

Figure 1: Beneficial interaction between plant and plant growth promoting fungi (PGPF) for enhanced and sustainable plant growth.

3 Potential Mechanisms Involved in PGPF Activities for Plant Growth

3.1 Siderophore Production

Due to the poor availability of iron in the environment, fungi produce microbial iron chelators known as siderophore production (Fig. 2). Phenolates, hydroxamates, and polycarboxylates are the three groupings that are introduced. It controls the synthesis of aromatic compounds, antibiotics, cytochromes, siderophores, vitamins, toxins, porphyrins, pigments, and nucleic acids [58]. Microbes producing siderophores are advantageous to plants because they can prevent the spread of plant diseases. It is possible that fungi make hydroxamate siderophores, which are stable down to pH-2.0, due to their ability to synthesize organic acids [59]. In fungus, ornithine has both hydroxylated and alkylated bases [60].

3.2 Antibiotics Production

Antibiotics are substances that can either kill or stop the growth of germs, the disease-causing microbes, and are active at extremely low concentrations. They are chemical substances that are produced as an essential part of the life process of an organism. Cephalosporin, fusaric acid, and penicillin are among the many antibiotics produced from fungi that have antibacterial and antifungal properties and are widely used as medications throughout the world. Fungal endophytes have been documented to develop using novel antibacterial, anticancer, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, and antiviral compounds [61].

images

Figure 2: Multifaceted enhancement of plant growth and defense responses through PGPF during mitigation of biotic and abiotic stress conditions.

3.3 Chitinase Production

The chitinase enzyme has drawn increased interest because of its many biotechnological applications, particularly in agriculture for the biocontrol of threatening insects and pathogenic fungi [62]. Chito-oligomers produced by the enzymatic hydrolysis of chitin are used in a wide range of industries, including medical, agricultural, and industrial uses, for their anti-fungal, antihypertensive, and antibacterial qualities as well as to improve food quality [63]. Recent evidence also demonstrated that CaEch1-mediated mitophagy regulates vegetative growth, conidiation, appressorium formation, and pathogenicity in Colletotrichum camelliae, highlighting the importance of fungal cellular regulation in host–fungus interactions [64].

3.4 Induced Systemic Resistance

Increased plant defenses against a variety of pests and pathogens are known as induced resistance (IR) [65]. The physical and mechanical strength of the cell wall was increased, and the physiological and biochemical responses of the host were changed by the plant growth promoting rhizosphere, which in turn induced ISR in plants. It triggers the defense mechanisms like proteins connected to peroxidase, chitinase, and pathogenicity [66].

3.5 Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) Production

Several PGPF have been found to be able to produce IAA in vitro. For instance, Rhodosporidiobolus paludigenum and Cryptococcus flavus isolated from rice leaves [67] found to produce IAA. R. graminis and R. mucilaginosa are the first endophytic yeast strains found in Populus species [68]. They can enhance squash, pepper, and tomato plant development and fruit production due to their ability to produce IAA which is evidenced from previous research [34]. Further, different endophytic filamentous fungus species, including F. oxysporum and P. chrysogenum isolated from tea [69], have been found to be capable of producing Giberellic acid in vitro. Aspergillus clavatus [70], Gliomastix murorum [33], Penicillium citrinum [71], Phoma glomerata [72], or Aspergillus niger [73] boost plant height by producing GA3, GA4, and GA7.

Although these mechanisms are well documented, their effectiveness is highly context dependent. Environmental conditions, soil microbiome composition, and host plant specificity significantly influence the expression and efficiency of these mechanisms. Furthermore, interactions among mechanisms (e.g., nutrient solubilization and ISR) may result in synergistic or antagonistic effects, which are not yet fully understood.

3.6 Molecular Signaling and Cross-Kingdom Communication in PGPF Interactions

Recent studies have demonstrated that plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) establish sophisticated molecular communication systems with host plants through signal molecule exchange and regulatory networks. Signaling compounds such as flavonoids, strigolactones, lipochitooligosaccharides, fungal elicitors, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are involved in the establishment of plant–fungus symbiosis and activation of downstream defense and growth pathways [9,10,53,56,57]. These signaling interactions regulate nutrient acquisition, root architecture modification, stress adaptation, and induced systemic resistance.

In addition, several symbiosis-related genes are differentially regulated during plant–fungus interactions. Genes associated with nutrient transporters, phytohormone biosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes, defense-related proteins, and stress-responsive pathways play essential roles in enhancing plant growth and tolerance under adverse environmental conditions [74,75,76,77]. Recent transcriptomic and metabolomic studies have further improved understanding of fungal-mediated molecular regulation in plants [78,79,80,81,82].

Emerging evidence also highlights the role of small RNAs (sRNAs) in cross-kingdom communication between fungi and plants. Fungal-derived sRNAs can suppress host immune responses by targeting plant defense genes, whereas plant-derived sRNAs may regulate fungal pathogenicity and colonization processes. These findings provide new insights into the molecular basis of plant–fungus interactions and offer promising opportunities for microbiome engineering and precision agriculture.

4 Applications and Efficacies of PGPF in Promoting Plant Health

4.1 Nitrogen Availability

Direct nitrogen transfer to plants occurs through the synthesis of ammonia. Cereals, such as wheat and rice, are the principal sources of this process. Within the roots of these plants, fungi like Trichoderma harzianum and T. gammii, as well as Aspergillus niger, contribute to the production and transportation of ammonia [83]. This ammonia synthesis and transfer play a crucial role in supporting plant growth and development. Additionally, other fungi like Penicillium chrysogenum and P. crustosum found in the roots of maize plants have also been associated with ammonia production, further enhancing shoot and root length, as well as overall plant biomass [84]. This direct nitrogen transfer mechanism facilitated by ammonia synthesis is vital for ensuring optimal nutrient availability and promoting healthy plant growth.

PGPF has been proven to enhance the plant’s nitrogen (N) uptake capacity across various crops, with rice being a particularly notable example. Studies have demonstrated that the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, isolated from lesser bulrush (Typha angustifolia), can substantially improve rice plant growth while increasing the nitrogen content within their tissues [85]. Moreover, in the case of rice, specific isolates of the filamentous fungus Phomopsis liquidambari have been found to boost plant nitrogen content by promoting the decomposition of below-ground straw and facilitating nitrogen transformation processes [86]. These findings highlight the significant role played by PGPF in enhancing plant nitrogen uptake, ultimately contributing to improved growth and nutrient assimilation in crops such as rice.

4.2 Phosphate Solubilization and Phosphorus Availability

Plant growth-promoting fungi play a crucial role in phosphate solubilization, thereby enhancing plant nutrient availability (Fig. 2). These fungi possess the ability to release organic acids, such as citric acid, oxalic acid, and gluconic acid, which facilitate the solubilization of insoluble phosphate compounds present in the soil. The organic acids produced by these fungi lower the pH in the rhizosphere, creating an acidic environment that promotes the release of phosphate ions from insoluble minerals. Additionally, some plant growth-promoting fungi produces enzymes like phosphatases, which break down organic phosphorus compounds into simpler forms that can be readily absorbed by plant roots. By solubilizing phosphate and making it more accessible to plants, these fungi contribute to improved phosphate uptake, leading to enhanced plant growth, root development, and overall nutrient utilization.

Several instances have been identified where plant growth-promoting fungi have proven beneficial in enhancing phosphorus availability and promoting the growth of various vegetable crops. For instance, in the case of chillies, the filamentous fungus Xylaria regalis, isolated from Thuja plicata, has been shown to increase phosphorus content in seedling tissues and enhance the size of stems and roots [87]. Similarly, in maize yeasts Candida railenensis and Cryptococcus flavus have demonstrated significant potential in promoting plant growth and increasing shoot phosphorus content [88]. In wheat, the filamentous fungi Trametes versicolor and Serendipita indica have exhibited the ability to substantially enhance grain yield [89]. Additionally, in rice, Phomopsis liquidambari has been found to enhance phosphorus uptake and utilization, while also influencing microbiota patterns [90]. Furthermore, the filamentous fungus Talaromyces pinophilus has been discovered to enhance phosphorus uptake and promote plant development, even in industrial crops such as oil palm. These findings underscore the diverse roles that plant growth-promoting fungi can play in optimizing phosphorus availability and facilitating the growth of various crops.

4.3 Acquiring Iron

PGPF enhances iron acquisition and availability, ensuring adequate micronutrient supply for plant growth and development. PGPF enhances iron uptake by solubilizing insoluble iron compounds, making them more accessible to plants. This solubilization is facilitated by the release of organic acids, siderophores, and other compounds that chelate and mobilize iron. Siderophore production is another strategy employed by certain fungi, as these molecules bind to iron and enhance its uptake by plants. Additionally, PGPF can promote root growth and development, leading to increased surface area and root exudation, which enhances iron acquisition. Moreover, some PGPF can induce systemic responses in plants, such as the upregulation of iron acquisition-related genes or the production of iron-chelating compounds within the plant itself [91,92].

4.4 Additional Nutrient Acquisition

The disease resistance, mechanical stability, and nutritional value of a crop are all impacted by potassium (K) deficiency. In this regard, the solubilization of K by microbes is an effective substitute for providing plants with this element [93,94]. Various agricultural crop-isolated fungi can solubilize K in vitro. Zn-solubilizing microorganisms, which have been explored as potential plant growth-promoting elements, can be found in the soils of a variety of different crops [95]. As demonstrated by the presence of Serendipita indica in lettuce, which has enhanced the Zn concentration in their tissues, chlorophyll content, and plant development, whereas several species of the genus Penicillium have been reported as efficient zinc-solubilizing fungi capable of mobilizing insoluble zinc compounds through the production of organic acids and other metabolites [96], which increases the nutrient acquisition of plants [97]. In contrast, the fungus Neotyphodium coenophialum in Festuca arundinacea can increase both the plants uptake of K, Ca, and Mg and its growth [98].

Despite promising results, several limitations hinder the large-scale application of PGPF. These include host specificity, inconsistent field performance, environmental variability, and competition with native microbial communities. Addressing these challenges is essential for successful commercialization and field adoption. The potential of PGPF to reduce the detrimental effects of abiotic stresses has been examined in several studies, which are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Screened PGPF in stress mitigation with salient features.

PGPFPlant SpeciesActivities of PGPF under Stress ConditionsReferences
Fusarium oxysporumMintPromote plant growth and enhance host tolerance to drought stress.[99]
Trichoderma spp.Cucumis sativus(i) Suppresses Fusarium nematode complex through the production of volatile and nonvolatile organic compounds, ceratoplatanin-like small molecules, glucanases and chitinases.
(ii) Produce growth hormone and promote plant growth.
[100]
Cunninghamella bertholletiaeSolanum lycopersicum(i) Reduce symptoms of salinity, drought and heavy metal stresses by modulating the physiochemical apparatus, enhanced expression of SlCDF3 and SlICS genes.
(ii) Reduce the expression of SlACCase, SlAOS, SlGRAS6, SlRBOH, SlRING1, SlTAF1, and SlZH13 genes.
[74]
Glomus lamellosum or G. etunicatumCinnamomum migao(i) Alleviate drought stress by increasing CAT activity.
(ii) Higher water content in leaves and higher fresh and dry weight.
(iii) Lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content.
[101]
Ampelomyces sp.S. lycopersicum var. Better BoyEnhance drought stress tolerance and promote plant growth.[102]
Lecanicillium lecaniiS. lycopersicumInduce systemic resistance against biotic stress caused by Myzus persicae through strongly upregulated the salicylic acid associated genes and moderately upregulated the jasmonic acid associated genes.[103]
G. etunicatumJuglans regiaAlleviate drought stress and increase fresh weight, leaf number and N, P and Zn content in leaves.[104]
G. mossae with G. etunicatumJ. regiaLighten drought stress. Decrease leaves abscission and increase N, P and Zn content in leaves.[105]
Pseudomonas veroniiSesamum indicum L.Mitigate waterlogging-stress related damage and enhance lant growth.[106]
PseudomonasTriticum aestivumAlleviate heavy metal stress and reduce Catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), proline and MDA levels.[107]
P. fluorescens with biochar or compost or their combinationC. sativusReduce the effect of abiotic stress and enhance plant growth.[108]
Alternaria sp. or T. harzianumS. lycopersicum var. Rutger(i) Increasing salt and drought stress tolerance by lowering the content of ROS in plants.
(ii) Improve photosynthetic rate, root and shoot biomass and water use efficiency.
[109]
T. virensBrassica junceaGenetic transformation of an endochitinase gene ‘ech42’ enhanced tolerance to Alternaria blight.[110]
G. intraradices (Rhizophagus irregularis)S. lycopersicum, and Lactuca sativaIncrease drought tolerance.[111]
T. asperellumPopularEnhanced tolerance to salt stress (200 mMNaCl) via 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase.[30]
T. harzianumS. melongena(i) Reduce salt stress through increasing proline and phenolics.
(ii) Improved plant growth.
(iii) Increase phosphorous content.
[112]
T. harzianum and F. pallidoroseumOryza sativa(i) Alleviate severe drought stress via greater induction of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD).
(ii) Promote plant growth and production.
[113]
Chaetomium globosum or P. resedanumCapsicum annumImprove growth under salinity stress.[114]
G. intraradicesL. sativaIncreased mycorrhizal colonization with strigolactone production in a dose-dependent manner, which resulted in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)-induced growth promotion under salt stress.[115]
Phoma glomerata and Penicillium sp.C. sativus(i) mprove plant biomass and related growth parameters under sodium chloride and polyethylene glycol induced salinity and drought stress.
(ii) Modulated stresses through down-regulated abscisic acid, altered jasmonic acid, and elevated salicylic acid contents.
[116]
T. virensNicotiana tabacumEnhanced cadmium tolerance via Glutathione S-transferases.[117]
T. atroviridePennisetum glaucumImproved resistance to biotic stress caused by Sclerospora graminicola through β-1,3-Glucanase.[118]
G. mosesseaeFragaria × ananassa(i) Reduce drought stress by slowing down the reduction of Chl a + b.
(ii) Inhibit the decomposition of carotenoids.
[119]
Piriformospora indicaBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensis(i) Improve drought tolerance by stimulating antioxidant activities such as increasing peroxidase, CAT and SOD activities in leaves.
(ii) Increase lateral root development and root-shoot growth.
[75]
T. harzianumTheobroma cacao(i) Alleviate drought stress.
(ii) Increase osmolyte concentration and plant growth.
[120]
Phoma spp.Pinus tablaeformis(i) Delayed the onset of the drought response Increase the activity of CAT and SOD.
(ii) Improve the content of proline, chlorophyll and water in leaves.
[121]
G. mosseae or G. versiforme or G. diaphanumPoncirus trifoliataAlleviate drought stress by higher enzyme activity and lower CAT activity in soil.[122]
T. atrovirideLemonEndochitinase enhanced resistance to biotic stress caused by Phoma tracheiphila and Botrytis cinerea.[123]
T. harzianumT. cacaoIncrease plants tolerance against drought stress via gene expression change.[76]
G. intraradicesLycopersicum esculentumAlleviate drought stress and improve plant growth parameters.[124]
T. atroviridePoplar and black spruceAn endochinase gene increased resistance to Melampsora medusae in poplar and to Cylindrocladium floridanum in black spruce.[125]
T. atrovirideO. sativaIncreased resistance to Rhizoctonia Solani and Magnaporthe grisea via Endochitinase, N acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and glucanase.[40]
Funneliformis mosseae (G. mosseae)Grapevine(i) Greater tolerance to water stress.
(ii) Greater foliar growth. Higher concentration of P in the leaves.
(iii) Increase in water potential at dawn.
(iv) Higher carbon assimilation rates.
[126]

5 PGPF in Biotic and Abiotic Stress Management

In natural environments, plants are often exposed to multiple stresses simultaneously, and PGPF-mediated responses are interconnected. The integration of biotic and abiotic stress responses represents a critical area for advancing sustainable crop protection strategies. Due to the sessile nature, plants are subjected to a range of biotic (pathogens and insects) and abiotic (drought, salinity, high and low temperature, waterlogging, UV radiation and heavy metals) throughout their life cycle. Most of the cases, plants face multiple stresses in combination of different biotic and abiotic stresses at a time which restricts their growth, development and thereby reduces the production. Management of biotic and abiotic stresses in crop plants is essential for a better crop yield. To secure food production, a diverse range of chemicals including fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticides have been used since the green revolution which poses a negative impact on ecosystem and increase the risk of new diseases and pests. Therefore, it is important to include ecofriendly approaches, and biological control is one of them as a potential tool. PGPF has been used as a biofertilizers and biocontrol agent which has shown its potential impact on controlling the abiotic and biotic stresses [127].

5.1 PGPF in Biotic Stress Management

Insects and pathogens are one of the most threats for crop production. A diverse range of biocontrol agents has been reported to improve plant resistance to pathogens. PGPF such as Beauveria bassiana, Chaetomium globosum, Cladosporium oxysporum, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Epichloë typhina, Fusarium oxysporum, Moesziomyces bullatus, Pichia anomala, Trichoderma species, Penicillium chrysogenum, and Sarocladium strictum showed their potentiality to suppress a diverse range of pathogens in crop plant [127,128,129,130]. Trichoderma spp. has shown its potential impact in suppressing the growth of diverse pathogens including F. oxysporum, R. solani, P. aphanidermatium, F. culmorum, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, Sclerotium rolfsii, Phytophthora cactorum, Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria spp. [130]. Pseudomonas spp. has shown lower infection rate in Acacica due to the endophyte F. oxysporum [131]. Serependita indica could develop symbiotic relationships with a range of crops which showed the suppression of other pathogens [132]. Other studies showed the antagonistic relationships with pathogenic fungus in cotton and tomato plants [133,134].

Plant associated endophytic fungi has been used against insect herbivores as well [127,135]. Beauveria bassiana has been reported as one of the most common endophytes in several crops including cocoa, tomato, potato, date palm, banana and poppy [12]. B. bassiana has been used to biocontrol agents against stem gall wasp, corn berer, berry borer, banana weevil and cotton aphid [135]. B. bassianas showed lower damage with higher fitness, infestation and better growth against the two-spotted spider mite with a significant reduction of survival rates [136,137]. Foliar spray of Metarhizium brunneum on melon and Cucumis melo showed reduction in leaf worm [138]. There are some other endophytic fungi such as Aspargillus parasiticus, Lecanicillium lecanii, Acremonium strictum, Metarhizium brunneum and Fusarium spp. have been used as a biocontrol agent against a diverse range of insect herbivores in diverse range of crops [139].

5.2 PGPF in Abiotic Stress Management

Abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, heat, cold, UV radiation, waterlogging, and heavy metals impair the growth and development of plants. Plants implicate a diverse range of molecular and physiological mechanisms to adapt to the adverse environmental conditions [114]. The symbiotic relationships between endophytes and host plants contribute to the plant adaptation to the environmental stimuli. Several studies have been carried out to apply the PGPF to reduce the negative impact of abiotic stresses which have been summarized as a tabular format (Table 2). Table 2 demonstrates that many PGPF species simultaneously confer tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses, indicating overlapping regulatory pathways and multifunctional roles. The application of endophytic fungi such as Epichole sp. has shown its role in improving the plant tolerance against drought stresses, heavy metals, waterlogging stress, salinity stresses in Hordeum vulgare, Lolium perenne, Hordeum brevisubulatum, Lolium arundinaceum, Fescus, ryegrass, and wheat [140,141,142,143]. Other endophytic fungi such as Penicillium roqueforti, P. citrnum, Aurobassium pullunts, T. harzianum, P. chrysohenum, Chaetomium globosum, Clonostachys rosea, Ampelomyces sp., Pilidium sp., Plectosphaerella sp., and Dothideomycetes sp. have been used to mitigate the abiotic stresses [144,145,146].

5.3 PGPF Mediated Stress Mitigation Mechanisms

To mitigate the negative impact of biotic and abiotic stresses in plants, plants activate and modify several physiological and molecular mechanisms. Changes in morphological traits in both above and below ground level, hormonal regulations, activation of defense pathway, production of metabolites, and changes in gene expression are the common underlying mechanisms that plant apply for better adaptation with or without costing the growth. PGPF are involved in plant responses by supporting the plant growth and assisting the plant defense systems either directly and/or indirectly. In addition to increasing the competition for foods, space and mycoparasitism with the insects and pathogens, PGPF positively regulates the plant underlying tolerance responses which are shown in Fig. 3.

images

Figure 3: Mechanistic insights of biotic and abiotic stress management through PGPF.

Plant growth regulators or phytohormone regulate plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses which activate the downstream signaling pathway to activate the defense systems in plants. A diverse range of PGPF has been reported to have the ability to synthesize the phytohormone [78]. Production of phytohormone at rhizosphere changes the root system’s architecture including the development of root hairs, increase the lateral roots, root length and root biomass which positively regulates the plant growth under both biotic and abiotic stresses [147]. Increase in synthesis of IAA, ABA, and suppression of ethylene has been reported to support the plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses.

Increase in primary and secondary metabolites are one of the major mechanisms of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Secondary metabolites including alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, peptides, setroides and terpenoids play major roles in plant resistance to biotic stresses [148]. Some PGPF can synthesize secondary metabolites having antifungal and antibacterial properties which inhibit the fungal and bacterial pathogens from infection. Besides the production of metabolites, PGPF are involved in production of enzymes and antioxidative compounds such as CAT, POD, SOD, osmolytes and prolines which mitigate the negative impact of reactive oxygen species generated due to the biotic and abiotic stresses [149].

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses are among the most widely utilized mechanisms by which plants adapt to environmental challenges [150]. SAR is a long lasting and broad-spectrum biotic stress resistance against the secondary infection [78]. PGPF play roles in activation of SAR in host plants by a several ways including increasing the phytohormone (JA, SA, MeSA, ET), gene expression (pathogenesis related genes), phenols, peroxidase, enzymatic activation (SOD, POD, polyphenol oxidase) and defense related protein (PR-1) [78,79,80,81,82].

Changes in gene expression levels are another underlying tolerant mechanism against biotic and abiotic stress conditions. PGPF are involved in modulating the gene expression pattern in host plants which positively regulates the plant tolerance level. Genes related to hormonal pathway, positive association with plant defense, activation in priming and systemic acquired resistance/tolerance, and enzymatic activation are positively regulated by plant associated fungal endophytes [77].

Maintaining the plant growth under biotic and abiotic stress conditions is one of the major concerns. PGPF are involved in nutrient acquisition, nutrient uptake, nutrient transfer and nutrient availability during the biotic and abiotic stresses which sustain plant growth and development with a minimum or negative impact due to stress [151]. Nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, and iron have been reported to be increased due to the symbiotic relationships which positively influence the plant adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses. Supporting the plant’s growth under biotic and abiotic stresses positively increases the plant’s adaptability.

6 Potential Application of PGPF in Circular Bioeconomy

The prospect of plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) within the context of circular bioeconomy holds significant promise for sustainable agricultural practices and the efficient utilization of resources. PGPF are beneficial fungi that form symbiotic relationships with plants, promoting their growth, enhancing nutrient uptake, and providing protection against various stresses. In a circular bioeconomy, the focus is on creating closed-loop systems that minimize waste, maximize resource efficiency, and promote regenerative processes. PGPF can play a vital role in this framework by improving nutrient cycling, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers, and enhancing soil health and fertility. By harnessing the potential of PGPF, farmers can optimize their crop yields while reducing environmental impacts, contributing to the development of a more sustainable and resilient agricultural sector.

Despite their potential, the large-scale implementation of PGPF within circular bioeconomy systems faces several challenges, including economic feasibility, formulation stability, and regulatory constraints. Lifecycle assessment and cost–benefit analyses are required to evaluate their long-term sustainability. Additionally, policy support and industry adoption will play critical roles in scaling up these technologies. Support of the circular bioeconomy and sustainable agriculture approaches depends on absolutely necessary plant growth-promoting fungus (PGPF). By combining biological systems into industrial and agricultural output, biocontrol perspectives and circular bioeconomy seeks to maximize resource efficiency and hence reduce waste [152,153]. By enhancing nutrient absorption, phytohormone producing, and soilborne pathogen control PGPF including species of Trichoderma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus—increases plant development. By means of biofertilizers and biopesticides developed from these fungi, dependency on chemical inputs can be minimized and environmental damage can be limited. PGPF also helps to value organic waste by turning agricultural waste into bioactive molecules that increase soil fertility [154]. Complementing ideas of turning biomass waste into profitable agricultural inputs, they enhance soil structure and encourage carbon sequestration. Moreover, in biorefineries combining PGPF with other microbial consortia could help to produce biopolymers and biofuels, therefore complete the nutrient cycle in agroecosystems [155]. Thus, using PGPF in agriculture is a sensible approach to support ecological resilience as well as for sustainable food production. Furthermore, the use of PGPF aligns with the principles of circularity by promoting the recycling and reuse of organic waste materials, such as agricultural residues and byproducts, which can serve as substrates for fungal growth and subsequent plant stimulation. The integration of PGPF into circular bioeconomy strategies represents a promising avenue for achieving sustainable and resource-efficient agriculture, fostering a harmonious relationship between plant health, environmental stewardship, and economic viability.

7 Challenges and Future Perspective

In natural ecosystems, plants interact with both mutualistic and pathogenic fungi. A key concern is how invading pathogens influences these beneficial interactions. Furthermore, it is still difficult to identify the native fungi from the environment, and many fungal species remain undocumented. Microbes screening, production, marketing, and commercialization are major obstacles to the use of microbial inoculants. Identification of microbiome interactions, diversity, effects on environmental stressors, and mechanism of action are required at the field and laboratory levels (Fig. 4). Future eco-friendly and efficient inoculants must be created using cutting-edge technologies like meta-proteomics, nanotechnology, and rhizoengineering.

images

Figure 4: Future direction and prospects concerning PGPF for crop protection and improvement.

Another important challenge limiting the large-scale application of PGPF is the instability of fungal colonization under diverse environmental conditions. Native soil microbial communities often compete with introduced fungal inoculants for ecological niches and nutrient resources, thereby reducing colonization efficiency and persistence. Environmental factors including soil pH, temperature fluctuations, salinity, drought stress, and moisture variability also influence fungal survival and effectiveness in field conditions [42,149,156,157]. Climate change-related stresses may further alter microbial community dynamics and plant–fungus interactions. Therefore, future studies should focus on developing environmentally adaptable and stress-resilient fungal inoculants with improved colonization stability and field persistence [158,159,160].

Endophytes-fungi have already been investigated as a unique source of fungal metabolites with a variety of possible uses in the medical area and as microorganisms that can help plants be more resilient to environmental challenges [161]. Despite these benefits, certain endophytes can coexist with the host plants for several cycles in a dormant state before manifesting indications of illness [162]. When the host (i.e., the plant tissue) becomes conductive to the development of illness, this relationship eventually alters [163]. In this context, abiotic stresses such as heat and water deficits, whether occurring individually or in combination, can significantly influence both the host plant and the pathogen, thereby affecting disease development and severity [164].

Microbial communities including living biomass and necromass are crucial to ecosystem stability and the rice—Stropharia rugosoannulata rotation paradigm for sustainable agriculture. Fungal necromass may maximize agricultural soil carbon sequestration in response to climate change and soil carbon accumulation, but further research is needed. These results offer new insights into sustainable agriculture plans that balance yield and environmental protection [164]. Another study highlights the function of plant-microbe signaling which produces strigolactones, phytohormones, and flavonoids in creating the microbial environment and increasing plant resistance. How genetics and next-generation sequencing can improve precision agriculture is also highlighted. Genotype-microbiome interactions, innovative microbial consortia, and precision agricultural system microbiome management should be studied to improve plant health and yield [165,166]. For plants to acquire nutrients, be able to tolerate stress, and maintain their overall health, the plant microbiome, which can be found in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere, is necessary. With conventional inoculants and synthetic biology, microbiome engineering increases food availability and drought resistance. Microbiome improvements and M genes aid agricultural resilience, but climate change worsens them. M gene studies to breed disease resistance and microbiome engineering’s environmental and agronomic implications are highlighted in this study. We conclude with rice microbiome engineering studies and approaches to sustainably boost agricultural output and reduce environmental impact [158].

Nanomaterials enhance hydration, nourishment, and active ingredient distribution. Nano-materials control hormones, photosynthesis, and antioxidants. Antibacterial and protective qualities increase plant immune responses and microbial-plant symbiosis [159], making plants more disease- and pest-resistant. Nanoparticles have health and environmental effects, and this report suggests eco-friendly ways to reduce risks. Nanotechnology, smart technologies, and precision agriculture could transform agriculture. This study illuminates nanomaterial R&D’s future, enabling a more resilient agricultural system [160].

While studies on free-living fungi and plant performance are limited, it is well established that root-associated fungi form mutualistic relationships with plants. Fungi in the rhizosphere performs essential biogeochemical cycles that are necessary to supply plants with food sources and hence increase crop productivity. Despite these advantages, little is known about how microorganism’s function in a natural setting when numerous biotic and abiotic stressors are present at once. The potential to use diverse plant/microorganism combinations in specific crops, most notably tomato, has already permitted the identification of microbial species that may be exploited to improve tolerance and resilience to a state of stress. These effects are species-specific [156,157].

To establish a clear and actionable research agenda for advancing plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) in sustainable agriculture, future research should focus on several key priorities. First, long-term, multi-environment field validation is essential to bridge the gap between controlled experimental outcomes and field-level performance, as most current studies remain limited to greenhouse or short-term trials despite demonstrating significant improvements in plant growth and physiological traits [167,168]. Second, integrated multi-omics approaches (metagenomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics) should be prioritized to elucidate complex plant–fungus–microbiome interactions. Recent evidence shows that PGPF regulate primary and secondary metabolites, antioxidant systems, and stress-responsive pathways, thereby enhancing plant tolerance to drought and salinity stress [169,170]. Third, future studies should emphasize the development of synthetic microbial consortia, as mixed inoculations and native fungal communities often outperform single-strain applications by improving nutrient uptake, osmotic regulation, and stress resilience under adverse environmental conditions [168,171]. Fourth, scalable formulation and delivery systems, including nano-enabled carriers and stress-tolerant inoculants, must be optimized to enhance shelf-life, colonization efficiency, and field applicability. Additionally, the integration of PGPF into precision agriculture and climate-smart farming systems through data-driven microbiome management is crucial for maximizing productivity under changing climatic conditions [172,173]. Finally, host specificity and functional diversity of fungal strains should be systematically investigated, as different PGPF species exhibit variable effects on plant physiology, antioxidant activity, and stress mitigation depending on environmental conditions and host genotype [171,173]. Addressing these research priorities will facilitate the transition of PGPF from experimental systems to scalable, field-ready solutions for sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture.

Recent studies on fungal stress adaptation mechanisms, including BdUth1-associated pathways, have provided important insights into fungal survival, cellular homeostasis, and environmental adaptability under stress conditions [171,172,173]. Understanding these molecular regulatory pathways may improve the development of stress-tolerant fungal inoculants for sustainable agricultural applications [158,159,160]. The construction of synthetic fungal microbiota based on functional complementarity has emerged as a promising strategy for sustainable agriculture. Combining fungal strains possessing complementary traits such as nutrient solubilization, phytohormone production, stress tolerance, antioxidant activity, and pathogen suppression may provide more stable and efficient plant growth promotion than single-strain inoculants [158,165,168,171]. Such multifunctional microbial consortia can improve nutrient cycling, ecological stability, and plant resilience under complex environmental conditions. Future research should therefore prioritize the rational design of crop-specific fungal consortia using systems biology and microbiome engineering approaches.

8 Conclusion

Plant growth-promoting fungi holds significant potential for sustainable agriculture, enhancing plant growth and productivity in an eco-friendly and cost-effective manner. Understanding of many biochemical, physiological, and ecological aspects of plant-microbe interactions has advanced, and a considerable body of research has been developed; this suggests a relevant function to increase plant tolerance and resilience. While the mechanisms governing plant defenses in response to beneficial microbes remain partially understood, the functional potential of plant-associated microbiota warrants further exploration. For some crop cultivars where diseases have overcome genetic resistance, the introduction of beneficial plant-associated microbes to increase plant resistance may also be helpful. There are various elements that influence the plant microbiome and its interactions, which are extremely diverse. The importance of the rhizospheric microbiota, which includes fungi that promotes plant growth and is good for plant development and yield, is underscored by scientific research. Current breakthroughs in molecular and bioinformatics technologies have enabled the identification of beneficial fungal species that can stimulate the growth of their host plants via a variety of mechanisms. Precision farming, which strives to reduce input while increasing output by using targeted action and monitoring environmental variables, should be the major goal of farming in the future via PGPF. It is therefore vital to investigate the fundamental mechanisms of plant-microbe interactions to incorporate microbes in the development of sustainable agricultural techniques for crop protection and improvement.

This review demonstrates that plant growth-promoting fungi represent a key component of sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture by integrating nutrient efficiency, stress tolerance, and ecological sustainability. However, bridging the gap between laboratory research and field application remains a major challenge. Future research should prioritize scalable, crop-specific inoculant development supported by advanced omics technologies and precision agriculture. The integration of PGPF into circular bioeconomy systems offers a promising pathway toward sustainable food production and environmental conservation.

Acknowledgement: Not applicable.

Funding Statement: The authors received no specific funding for this study.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Kallol Das and Aniruddha Sarker; methodology, Kallol Das and Aniruddha Sarker; resources, Kallol Das; writing—original draft preparation, Kallol Das, Abu Bakar Siddique, Saifullah Omar Nasif, Ramadan A. Arafa and Aniruddha Sarker; writing—review and editing, F. M. Aminuzzaman and Deen Mohammad Deepo; visualization, Kallol Das; supervision, Kallol Das. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials: Not applicable.

Ethics Approval: Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division . World population prospects 2019. New York, NY, USA: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division; 2019. Report No.: ST/ESA/SER.A/425. [Google Scholar]

2. Hunter MC , Smith RG , Schipanski ME , Atwood LW , Mortensen DA . Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. BioScience. 2017; 67( 4): 386– 91. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

3. Mendes R , Garbeva P , Raaijmakers JM . The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013; 37( 5): 634– 63. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

4. Fiorin GL , Sanchéz-Vallet A , de Toledo Thomazella DP , do Prado PF , do Nascimento LC , de Oliveira Figueira AV , et al. Suppression of plant immunity by fungal chitinase-like effectors. Curr Biol. 2018; 28( 18): 3023– 30. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

5. Lugtenberg B , Kamilova F . Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009; 63: 541– 56. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

6. Glick BR . Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012; 2012: 963401. doi:10.6064/2012/963401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

7. Hawksworth DL , Lücking R . Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. In: The fungal kingdom. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2017. p. 79– 95. doi:10.1128/9781555819583.ch4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

8. Abreo E , Valle D , González A , Altier N . Control of damping-off in tomato seedlings exerted by Serratia spp. strains and identification of inhibitory bacterial volatiles in vitro. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2021; 44( 2): 126177. doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

9. Baazeem A , Almanea A , Manikandan P , Alorabi M , Vijayaraghavan P , Abdel-Hadi A . In vitro antibacterial, antifungal, nematocidal and growth promoting activities of Trichoderma hamatum FB10 and its secondary metabolites. J Fungi. 2021; 7( 5): 331. doi:10.3390/jof7050331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

10. Korpi A , Järnberg J , Pasanen AL . Microbial volatile organic compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009; 39( 2): 139– 93. doi:10.1080/10408440802291497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

11. Lyn ME , Burnett D , Garcia AR , Gray R . Interaction of water with three granular biopesticide formulations. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58( 3): 1804– 14. doi:10.1021/jf903309s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

12. Sánchez-Rodríguez AR , Raya-Díaz S , Zamarreño ÁM , García-Mina JM , del Campillo MC , Quesada-Moraga E . An endophytic Beauveria bassiana strain increases spike production in bread and durum wheat plants and effectively controls cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) larvae. Biol Control. 2018; 116: 90– 102. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

13. Kasambala Donga T , Vega FE , Klingen I . Establishment of the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte in sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum. Fungal Ecol. 2018; 35: 70– 7. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2018.06.008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

14. Kepenekci I , Hazir S , Oksal E , Lewis EE . Application methods of Steinernema feltiae, Xenorhabdus bovienii and Purpureocillium lilacinum to control root-knot nematodes in greenhouse tomato systems. Crop Prot. 2018; 108: 31– 8. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2018.02.009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

15. Krell V , Unger S , Jakobs-Schoenwandt D , Patel AV . Endophytic Metarhizium brunneum mitigates nutrient deficits in potato and improves plant productivity and vitality. Fungal Ecol. 2018; 34: 43– 9. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2018.04.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

16. Dara SK , Dara SSR , Dara SS . Impact of entomopathogenic fungi on the growth, development, and health of cabbage growing under water stress. Am J Plant Sci. 2017; 8( 6): 1224– 33. doi:10.4236/ajps.2017.86081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

17. Huang WK , Cui JK , Liu SM , Kong LA , Wu QS , Peng H , et al. Testing various biocontrol agents against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in cucumber plants identifies a combination of Syncephalastrum racemosum and Paecilomyces lilacinus as being most effective. Biol Control. 2016; 92: 31– 7. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.09.008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

18. Jaber LR , Enkerli J . Effect of seed treatment duration on growth and colonization of Vicia Faba by endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium brunneum. Biol Control. 2016; 103: 187– 95. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.09.008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

19. Lopez DC , Sword GA . The endophytic fungal entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Purpureocillium lilacinum enhance the growth of cultivated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and negatively affect survival of the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa zea). Biol Control. 2015; 89: 53– 60. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.03.010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

20. Sasan RK , Bidochka MJ . The insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii (Clavicipitaceae) is also an endophyte that stimulates plant root development. Am J Bot. 2012; 99( 1): 101– 7. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

21. Elena GJ , Posadas JB , Perticari A , Lecuona RE . Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin promotes growth and has endophytic activity in tomato plants. Adv Biol Res. 2011; 5( 1): 22– 7. [Google Scholar]

22. Bennett AJ , Mead A , Whipps JM . Performance of carrot and onion seed primed with beneficial microorganisms in glasshouse and field trials. Biol Control. 2009; 51( 3): 417– 26. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.08.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

23. Yedidia I , Srivastva AK , Kapulnik Y , Chet I . Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations and increased growth of cucumber plants. Plant Soil. 2001; 235( 2): 235– 42. doi:10.1023/A:1011990013955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

24. Chandra Nayaka S , Niranjana SR , Uday Shankar AC , Niranjan Raj S , Reddy MS , Prakash HS , et al. Seed biopriming with novel strain of Trichoderma harzianum for the control of toxigenic Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisins in maize. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2010; 43( 3): 264– 82. doi:10.1080/03235400701803879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

25. Rahman M , Ali J , Masood M . Seed priming and Trichoderma Application: A method for improving seedling establishment and yield of dry direct seeded boro (winter) rice in Bangladesh. Univers J Agric Res. 2015; 3( 2): 59– 67. doi:10.13189/ujar.2015.030205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

26. Lee S , Yap M , Behringer G , Hung R , Bennett JW . Volatile organic compounds emitted by Trichoderma species mediate plant growth. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2016; 3: 7. doi:10.1186/s40694-016-0025-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

27. Bitas V , McCartney N , Li N , Demers J , Kim JE , Kim HS , et al. Fusarium oxysporum volatiles enhance plant growth via affecting auxin transport and signaling. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6: 1248. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

28. Islam S , Akanda AM , Prova A , Sultana F , Hossain MM . Growth promotion effect of Fusarium spp. PPF1 from bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) rhizosphere on Indian spinach (Basella alba) seedlings are linked to root colonisation. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2014; 47( 19): 2319– 31. doi:10.1080/03235408.2013.876745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

29. Radhakrishnan R , Kang SM , Baek IY , Lee IJ . Characterization of plant growth-promoting traits of Penicillium Species against the effects of high soil salinity and root disease. J Plant Interact. 2014; 9( 1): 754– 62. doi:10.1080/17429145.2014.930524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

30. Zhang S , Gan Y , Xu B . Application of plant-growth-promoting fungi Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1405. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

31. Zavala-Gonzalez EA , Rodríguez-Cazorla E , Escudero N , Aranda-Martinez A , Martínez-Laborda A , Ramírez-Lepe M , et al. Arabidopsis thaliana root colonization by the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia is modulated by jasmonate signaling and leads to accelerated flowering and improved yield. New Phytol. 2017; 213( 1): 351– 64. doi:10.1111/nph.14106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

32. Shivanna MB , Meera MS , Kubota M , Hyakumachi M . Promotion of growth and yield in cucumber by zoysiagrass rhizosphere fungi. Microbes Environ. 2005; 20( 1): 34– 40. doi:10.1264/jsme2.20.34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

33. Khan AL , Hamayun M , Ahmad N , Waqas M , Kang SM , Kim YH , et al. Exophiala sp. LHL08 reprograms Cucumis sativus to higher growth under abiotic stresses. Physiol Plant. 2011; 143( 4): 329– 43. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01508.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

34. Khan AL , Shinwari ZK , Kim YH , Waqas M , Hamayun M , Kamran M , et al. Role of endophyte Chaetomium globosum LK4 in growth of Capsicum annuum by producion of gibberellins and indole acetic acid. Pak J Bot. 2012; 44( 5): 1601– 7. [Google Scholar]

35. Zhou Z , Zhang C , Zhou W , Li W , Chu L , Yan J , et al. Diversity and plant growth-promoting ability of endophytic fungi from the five flower plant species collected from Yunnan, Southwest China. J Plant Interact. 2014; 9( 1): 585– 91. doi:10.1080/17429145.2013.873959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

36. Aly AH , Debbab A , Proksch P . Fungal endophytes: Unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90( 6): 1829– 45. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3270-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

37. Hyakumachi M . Plant-growth-promoting fungi from turfgrass rhizosphere with potential for disease suppression. Soil Microorg. 1994; 44: 53– 68. [Google Scholar]

38. Thines M , Kamoun S . Oomycete-plant coevolution: Recent advances and future prospects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010; 13( 4): 427– 33. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

39. Romera FJ , García MJ , Lucena C , Martínez-Medina A , Aparicio MA , Ramos J , et al. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) and Fe deficiency responses in dicot plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 287. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

40. Liu XM , Zhang H . The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 774. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

41. Begum N , Qin C , Ahanger MA , Raza S , Khan MI , Ashraf M , et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 1068. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

42. Ahmad M , Pataczek L , Hilger TH , Ahmad Zahir Z , Hussain A , Rasche F , et al. Perspectives of microbial inoculation for sustainable development and environmental management. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9: 2992. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

43. Vinale F , Sivasithamparam K , Ghisalberti EL , Marra R , Woo SL , Lorito M . Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008; 40( 1): 1– 10. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

44. Velázquez E , Silva LR , Ramírez-Bahena MH , Peix A . Diversity of potassium-solubilizing microorganisms and their interactions with plants. In: Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2016. p. 99– 110. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

45. Köhl J , Kolnaar R , Ravensberg WJ . Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: Relevance beyond efficacy. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 845. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

46. Ferraz P , Cássio F , Lucas C . Potential of yeasts as biocontrol agents of the phytopathogen causing cacao Witches’ broom disease: Is microbial warfare a solution? Front Microbiol. 2019; 10: 1766. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

47. Jaber LR , Enkerli J . Fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: Can they promote plant growth? Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2017; 27( 1): 28– 41. doi:10.1080/09583157.2016.1243227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

48. Waghunde RR , Shelake RM , Shinde MS , Hayashi H . Endophyte microbes: A weapon for plant health management. In: Microorganisms for green revolution. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 303– 25. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6241-4_16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

49. Ghorbanpour M , Omidvari M , Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P , Omidvar R , Kariman K . Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of beneficial fungi against plant diseases. Biol Control. 2018; 117: 147– 57. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.11.006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

50. Weyens N , van der Lelie D , Taghavi S , Vangronsveld J . Phytoremediation: Plant-endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009; 20( 2): 248– 54. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2009.02.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

51. Shelake RM , Waghunde RR , Morita EH , Hayashi H . Plant-microbe-metal interactions: Basics, recent advances, and future trends. In: Plant microbiome: Stress response. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 283– 305. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5514-0_13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

52. Stone BWG , Weingarten EA , Jackson CR . The role of the phyllosphere microbiome in plant health and function. Annu Plant Rev Online. 2018; 2( 1): 533– 56. doi:10.1002/9781119312994.apr0614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

53. Hossain MM , Sultana F , Hyakumachi M . Role of ethylene signalling in growth and systemic resistance induction by the plant growth-promoting fungus Penicillium Viridicatum in Arabidopsis. J Phytopathol. 2017; 165( 7–8): 432– 41. doi:10.1111/jph.12577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

54. Kloepper JW , Schroth MN . Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Conf Plant Pathog Bacter. 1978; 2: 879– 82. [Google Scholar]

55. Muslim A , Hyakumachi M , Kageyama K , Suwandi S . Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber by hypovirulent binucleate Rhizoctonia against anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum orbiculare. Trop Life Sci Res. 2019; 30( 1): 109– 22. doi:10.21315/tlsr2019.30.1.7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

56. Murali M , Sudisha J , Amruthesh KN , Ito SI , Shetty HS . Rhizosphere fungus Penicillium chrysogenum promotes growth and induces defence-related genes and downy mildew disease resistance in pearl millet. Plant Biol. 2013; 15( 1): 111– 8. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00617.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

57. Jogaiah S , Abdelrahman M , Tran LP , Shin-ichi I . Characterization of rhizosphere fungi that mediate resistance in tomato against bacterial wilt disease. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64( 12): 3829– 42. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

58. Saha M , Sarkar S , Sarkar B , Sharma BK , Bhattacharjee S , Tribedi P . Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016; 23( 5): 3984– 99. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4294-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

59. Szebesczyk A , Olshvang E , Shanzer A , Carver PL , Gumienna-Kontecka E . Harnessing the power of fungal siderophores for the imaging and treatment of human diseases. Coord Chem Rev. 2016; 327: 84– 109. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2016.05.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

60. Baakza A , Vala AK , Dave BP , Dube HC . A comparative study of siderophore production by fungi from marine and terrestrial habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2004; 311( 1): 1– 9. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.12.028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

61. Supaphon P , Keawpiboon C , Preedanon S , Phongpaichit S , Rukachaisirikul V . Isolation and antimicrobial activities of fungi derived from Nymphaea lotus and Nymphaea stellata. Mycoscience. 2018; 59( 5): 415– 23. doi:10.1016/j.myc.2018.02.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

62. Yadav AN , Sachan SG , Verma P , Kaushik R , Saxena AK . Cold active hydrolytic enzymes production by psychrotrophic Bacilli isolated from three sub-glacial lakes of NW Indian Himalayas. J Basic Microbiol. 2016; 56( 3): 294– 307. doi:10.1002/jobm.201500230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

63. Nagpure A , Choudhary B , Gupta RK . Chitinases: In agriculture and human healthcare. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014; 34( 3): 215– 32. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.790874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

64. Meng S , Xiong M , Cheng L , Wang L , Chen Y , Luo C , et al. CaEch1-mediated mitophagy regulates vegetative growth, conidiation, appressorium formation, and pathogenicity in Colletotrichum camelliae. Phytopathol Res. 2025; 7( 1): 20. doi:10.1186/s42483-024-00299-w. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

65. Ramamoorthy V , Viswanathan R , Raguchander T , Prakasam V , Samiyappan R . Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot. 2001; 20( 1): 1– 11. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00056-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

66. Nandakumar R , Babu S , Viswanathan R , Raguchander T , Samiyappan R . Induction of systemic resistance in rice against sheath blight disease by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001; 33( 4–5): 603– 12. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00202-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

67. Nutaratat P , Srisuk N , Arunrattiyakorn P , Limtong S . Fed-batch fermentation of indole-3-acetic acid production in stirred tank fermenter by red yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2016; 21( 3): 414– 21. doi:10.1007/s12257-015-0819-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

68. Xin G , Glawe D , Doty SL . Characterization of three endophytic, indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts occurring in Populus Trees. Mycol Res. 2009; 113( Pt 9): 973– 80. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2009.06.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

69. Nath R , Sharma GD , Barooah M . Plant growth promoting endophytic fungi isolated from tea (Camellia sinensis) shrubs of Assam, India. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2015; 13( 3): 877– 91. doi:10.15666/aeer/1303_877891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

70. You YH , Kwak TW , Kang SM , Lee MC , Kim JG . Aspergillus Clavatus Y2H0002 as a New Endophytic Fungal Strain Producing Gibberellins Isolated from Nymphoides pe ltata in Fresh Water. Mycobiology. 2015; 43( 1): 87– 91. doi:10.5941/MYCO.2015.43.1.87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

71. Khan SA , Hamayun M , Yoon H , Kim HY , Suh SJ , Hwang SK , et al. Plant growth promotion and Penicillium citrinum. BMC Microbiol. 2008; 8: 231. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

72. Waqas M , Khan AL , Kamran M , Hamayun M , Kang SM , Kim YH , et al. Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules. 2012; 17( 9): 10754– 73. doi:10.3390/molecules170910754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

73. Lubna , Asaf S , Hamayun M , Gul H , Lee IJ , Hussain A . Aspergillus niger CSR3 regulates plant endogenous hormones and secondary metabolites by producing gibberellins and indoleacetic acid. J Plant Interact. 2018; 13( 1): 100– 11. doi:10.1080/17429145.2018.1436199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

74. Kazerooni EA , Maharachchikumbura SSN , Al-Sadi AM , Rashid U , Kim ID , Kang SM , et al. Effects of the rhizosphere fungus Cunninghamella bertholletiae on the Solanum lycopersicum response to diverse abiotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23( 16): 8909. doi:10.3390/ijms23168909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

75. Sun C , Johnson JM , Cai D , Sherameti I , Oelmüller R , Lou B . Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance in Chinese cabbage leaves by stimulating antioxidant enzymes, the expression of drought-related genes and the plastid-localized CAS protein. J Plant Physiol. 2010; 167( 12): 1009– 17. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

76. Morán-Diez E , Rubio B , Domínguez S , Hermosa R , Monte E , Nicolás C . Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24h incubation with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. J Plant Physiol. 2012; 169( 6): 614– 20. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

77. Muthu Narayanan M , Ahmad N , Shivanand P , Metali F . The role of endophytes in combating fungal- and bacterial-induced stress in plants. Molecules. 2022; 27( 19): 6549. doi:10.3390/molecules27196549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

78. Chaudhary P , Agri U , Chaudhary A , Kumar A , Kumar G . Endophytes and their potential in biotic stress management and crop production. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 933017. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.933017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

79. Ashajyothi M , Kumar A , Sheoran N , Ganesan P , Gogoi R , Subbaiyan GK , et al. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) associated endophytic Pseudomonas putida BP25 alters root phenotype and induces defense in rice (Oryza sativa L.) against blast disease incited by Magnaporthe oryzae. Biol Control. 2020; 143: 104181. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

80. Savani AK , Bhattacharyya A , Baruah A . Endophyte mediated activation of defense enzymes in banana plants pre-immunized with covert endophytes. Indian Phytopathol. 2020; 73( 3): 433– 41. doi:10.1007/s42360-020-00245-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

81. Portieles R , Xu H , Yue Q , Zhao L , Zhang D , Du L , et al. Heat-killed endophytic bacterium induces robust plant defense responses against important pathogens. Sci Rep. 2021; 11( 1): 12182. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91837-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

82. War AR , Paulraj MG , War MY , Ignacimuthu S . Role of salicylic acid in induction of plant defense system in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Signal Behav. 2011; 6( 11): 1787– 92. doi:10.4161/psb.6.11.17685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

83. Rinu K , Sati P , Pandey A . Trichoderma gamsii (NFCCI 2177): A newly isolated endophytic, psychrotolerant, plant growth promoting, and antagonistic fungal strain. J Basic Microbiol. 2014; 54( 5): 408– 17. doi:10.1002/jobm.201200579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

84. Mehmood A , Khan N , Irshad M , Hamayun M , Husna I , Javed A , et al. IAA producing endopytic fungus Fusariun oxysporum wlw colonize maize roots and promoted maize growth under hydroponic condition. Eur Exp Biol. 2018; 8( 4): 24. doi:10.21767/2248-9215.100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

85. Paul K , Saha C , Nag M , Mandal D , Naiya H , Sen D , et al. A tripartite interaction among the basidiomycete Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, N2-fixing endobacteria, and rice improves plant nitrogen nutrition. Plant Cell. 2020; 32( 2): 486– 507. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

86. Sun K , Zhang FM , Kang N , Gong JH , Zhang W , Chen Y , et al. Rice carbohydrate dynamics regulate endophytic colonization of Diaporthe liquidambaris in response to external nitrogen. Fungal Ecol. 2019; 39: 213– 24. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2019.02.010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

87. Adnan M , Alshammari E , Ashraf SA , Patel K , Lad K , Patel M . Physiological and molecular characterization of biosurfactant producing endophytic fungi Xylaria regalis from the cones of Thuja plicata as a potent plant growth promoter with its potential application. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 7362148. doi:10.1155/2018/7362148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

88. Sarabia M , Jakobsen I , Grønlund M , Carreon-Abud Y , Larsen J . Rhizosphere yeasts improve P uptake of a maize arbuscular mycorrhizal association. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018; 125: 18– 25. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.12.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

89. Taghinasab M , Imani J , Steffens D , Glaeser SP , Kogel KH . The root endophytes Trametes versicolor and Piriformospora indica increase grain yield and P content in wheat. Plant Soil. 2018; 426( 1): 339– 48. doi:10.1007/s11104-018-3624-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

90. Tang MJ , Zhu Q , Zhang FM , Zhang W , Yuan J , Sun K , et al. Enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus activation with an optimized bacterial community by endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambari in paddy soil. Microbiol Res. 2019; 221: 50– 9. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

91. Tariq A , Guo S , Farhat F , Shen X . Engineering synthetic microbial communities: diversity and applications in soil for plant resilience. Agronomy. 2025; 15( 3): 513. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

92. Řezanka T , Palyzová A , Faltýsková H , Sigler K . Siderophores: Amazing metabolites of microorganisms. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 2019; 60: 157– 88. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64181-6.00005-X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

93. Nawaz A , Qamar ZU , Marghoob MU , Imtiaz M , Imran A , Mubeen F . Contribution of potassium solubilizing bacteria in improved potassium assimilation and cytosolic K+/Na+ ratio in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under saline-sodic conditions. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1196024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1196024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

94. Meena VS , Bahadur I , Maurya BR , Kumar A , Meena RK , Meena SK , et al. Potassium-Solubilizing Microorganism in Evergreen Agriculture: An Overview. In: Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2016. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

95. Kumawat N , Kumar R , Khandkar UR , Yadav RK , Saurabh K , Mishra JS , et al. Silicon (Si)- and zinc (Zn)-solubilizing microorganisms: Role in sustainable agriculture. In: Biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture and environment. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 109– 35. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18933-4_6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

96. Kushwaha P , Kashyap PL , Pandiyan K , Bhardwaj AK . Zinc-solubilizing microbes for sustainable crop production: Current understanding, opportunities, and challenges. In: Solanki M , Kashyap P , Kumari B , editors. Phytobiomes: Current insights and future vistas. Singapore: Springer; 2020. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3151-4_11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

97. Padash A , Shahabivand S , Behtash F , Aghaee A . A practicable method for zinc enrichment in lettuce leaves by the endophyte fungus Piriformospora Indica under increasing zinc supply. Sci Hortic. 2016; 213: 367– 72. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

98. Rahman MH , Saiga S . Endophytic fungi (Neotyphodium coenophialum) affect the growth and mineral uptake, transport and efficiency ratios in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Plant Soil. 2005; 272( 1): 163– 71. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-4682-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

99. Ogbe AA , Gupta S , Stirk WA , Finnie JF , Van Staden J . Growth-promoting characteristics of fungal and bacterial endophytes isolated from a drought-tolerant mint species Endostemon obtusifolius (E. mey. ex Benth.) N. E. Br. Plants. 2023; 12( 3): 638. doi:10.3390/plants12030638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

100. Nakkeeran S , Sreenayana B , Saravanan R , Renukadevi P , Vinodkumar S . Harnessing the antifungal and antinemic potential of Trichoderma in integrated crop management system for mitigating fungal nematode complex in cucumber. In: Integrated pest management in diverse cropping systems. New York, NY, USA: Apple Academic Press; 2022. p. 485– 516. doi:10.1201/9781003304524-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

101. Liao X , Chen J , Guan R , Liu J , Sun Q . Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviates drought stress and improves plant growth in Cinnamomum migao seedlings. Mycobiology. 2021; 49( 4): 396– 405. doi:10.1080/12298093.2021.1938803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

102. Morsy M , Cleckler B , Armuelles-Millican H . Fungal endophytes promote tomato growth and enhance drought and salt tolerance. Plants. 2020; 9( 7): 877. doi:10.3390/plants9070877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

103. Hanan A , Basit A , Nazir T , Majeed MZ , Qiu D . Anti-insect activity of a partially purified protein derived from the entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimmermann) and its putative role in a tomato defense mechanism against green peach aphid. J Invertebr Pathol. 2020; 170: 107282. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2019.107282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

104. Behrooz A , Vahdati K , Rejali F , Lotfi M , Sarikhani S , Leslie C . Arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth-promoting bacteria alleviate drought stress in walnut. HortScience. 2019; 54( 6): 1087– 92. doi:10.21273/hortsci13961-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

105. Meddich AB , Ouhaddou R , Anli M , Boutasknit AB . Role of phosphorus and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the growth performances and tolerance of barley to water stress. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2021; 22: 45– 67. [Google Scholar]

106. Ali S , Khan MA , Kim WC . Pseudomonas veronii KJ mitigates flood stress-associated damage in Sesamum indicum L. Appl Biol Chem. 2018; 61( 5): 575– 85. doi:10.1007/s13765-018-0392-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

107. Rizvi A , Khan MS . Biotoxic impact of heavy metals on growth, oxidative stress and morphological changes in root structure of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and stress alleviation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain CPSB1. Chemosphere. 2017; 185: 942– 52. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

108. Nadeem SM , Imran M , Naveed M , Khan MY , Ahmad M , Zahir ZA , et al. Synergistic use of biochar, compost and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for enhancing cucumber growth under water deficit conditions. J Sci Food Agric. 2017; 97( 15): 5139– 45. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

109. Azad K , Kaminskyj S . A fungal endophyte strategy for mitigating the effect of salt and drought stress on plant growth. Symbiosis. 2016; 68( 1): 73– 8. doi:10.1007/s13199-015-0370-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

110. Kamble S , Mukherjee PK , Eapen S . Expression of an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens confers enhanced tolerance to Alternaria Blight in transgenic Brassica juncea (L.) czern and coss lines. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2016; 22( 1): 69– 76. doi:10.1007/s12298-016-0340-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

111. Ruiz-Lozano JM , Aroca R , Zamarreño ÁM , Molina S , Andreo-Jiménez B , Porcel R , et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis induces strigolactone biosynthesis under drought and improves drought tolerance in lettuce and tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39( 2): 441– 52. doi:10.1111/pce.12631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

112. Velmurugan A , Swarnam TP , Krishna Kumar KK , Sakthivel K , Rachael R , Sarojini R . Evaluation of Trichoderma isolates for induced soil salinity stress management in egg plant. Trends Biosci. 2015; 8: 1595– 601. [Google Scholar]

113. Yogendra SG , Singh US , Sharma AK . Enhance activity of stress related enzymes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) induced by plant growth promoting fungi under drought stress. Afr J Agric Res. 2014; 9( 19): 1430– 4. doi:10.5897/ajar2014.8575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

114. Khan AL , Waqas M , Khan AR , Hussain J , Kang SM , Gilani SA , et al. Fungal endophyte Penicillium janthinellum LK5 improves growth of ABA-deficient tomato under salinity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 29( 11): 2133– 44. doi:10.1007/s11274-013-1378-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

115. Aroca R , Ruiz-Lozano JM , Zamarreño AM , Paz JA , García-Mina JM , Pozo MJ , et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants. J Plant Physiol. 2013; 170( 1): 47– 55. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2012.08.020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

116. Ouhaddou R , Anli M , Ben-Laouane R , Boutasknit A , Baslam M , Meddich A . The importance of the Glomus Genus as a potential candidate for sustainable agriculture under arid environments: A review. Int J Plant Biol. 2025; 16( 1): 32. doi:10.3390/ijpb16010032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

117. Dixit P , Mukherjee PK , Ramachandran V , Eapen S . Glutathione transferase from Trichoderma virens enhances cadmium tolerance without enhancing its accumulation in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum. PLoS One. 2011; 6( 1): e16360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

118. O’Kennedy MM , Crampton BG , Lorito M , Chakauya E , Breese WA , Burger JT , et al. Expression of a β-1, 3-glucanase from a biocontrol fungus in transgenic pearl millet. S Afr N J Bot. 2011; 77( 2): 335– 45. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.09.016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

119. Yin B , Wang Y , Liu P , Hu J , Zhen W . Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on the protective system in strawberry leaves under drought stress. Front Agric China. 2010; 4( 2): 165– 9. doi:10.1007/s11703-010-0109-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

120. Bae H , Sicher RC , Kim MS , Kim SH , Strem MD , Melnick RL , et al. The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60( 11): 3279– 95. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

121. Yooyongwech S , Phaukinsang N , Cha-um S , Supaibulwatana K . Arbuscular mycorrhiza improved growth performance in Macadamia tetraphylla L. grown under water deficit stress involves soluble sugar and proline accumulation. Plant Growth Regul. 2013; 69( 3): 285– 93. doi:10.1007/s10725-012-9771-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

122. Wu QS , Xia RX , Zou YN . Improved soil structure and Citrus Growth after inoculation with three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under drought stress. Eur J Soil Biol. 2008; 44( 1): 122– 8. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.10.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

123. Gentile A , Deng Z , La Malfa S , Distefano G , Domina F , Vitale A , et al. Enhanced resistance to Phoma tracheiphila and Botrytis cinerea in transgenic lemon plants expressing a Trichoderma harzianum chitinase gene. Plant Breed. 2007; 126( 2): 146– 51. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01297.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

124. Subramanian KS , Santhanakrishnan P , Balasubramanian P . Responses of field grown tomato plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization under varying intensities of drought stress. Sci Hortic. 2006; 107( 3): 245– 53. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2005.07.006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

125. Noël A , Levasseur C , Le VQ , Séguin A . Enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens in forest trees by genetic transformation of black spruce and hybrid poplar with a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005; 67( 2): 92– 9. doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.09.010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

126. Nikolaou N , Angelopoulos K , Karagiannidis N . Effects of drought stress on mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal cabernet sauvignon grapevine, grafted onto various rootstocks. Exp Agric. 2003; 39( 3): 241– 52. doi:10.1017/s001447970300125x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

127. Nasif SO , Siddique AB , Siddique AB , Islam MM , Hassan O , Deepo DM , et al. Prospects of endophytic fungi as a natural resource for the sustainability of crop production in the modern era of changing climate. Symbiosis. 2023; 89( 1): 1– 25. doi:10.1007/s13199-022-00879-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

128. De Silva NI , Brooks S , Lumyong S , Hyde KD . Use of endophytes as biocontrol agents. Fungal Biol Rev. 2019; 33( 2): 133– 48. doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2018.10.001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

129. Ownley BH , Griffin MR , Klingeman WE , Gwinn KD , Moulton JK , Pereira RM . Beauveria bassiana: Endophytic colonization and plant disease control. J Invertebr Pathol. 2008; 98( 3): 267– 70. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2008.01.010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

130. Larran S , Simón MR , Moreno MV , Siurana MPS , Perelló A . Endophytes from wheat as biocontrol agents against Tan spot disease. Biol Control. 2016; 92: 17– 23. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.09.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

131. González-Teuber M , Jiménez-Alemán GH , Boland W . Foliar endophytic fungi as potential protectors from pathogens in myrmecophytic Acacia plants. Commun Integr Biol. 2014; 7( 5): e970500. doi:10.4161/19420889.2014.970500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

132. Baron NC , Rigobelo EC . Endophytic fungi: A tool for plant growth promotion and sustainable agriculture. Mycology. 2022; 13( 1): 39– 55. doi:10.1080/21501203.2021.1945699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

133. Bader AN , Salerno GL , Covacevich F , Consolo VF . Native Trichoderma harzianum strains from Argentina produce indole-3 acetic acid and phosphorus solubilization, promote growth and control wilt disease on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J King Saud Univ Sci. 2020; 32( 1): 867– 73. doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2019.04.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

134. Zhou W , Wheeler TA , Starr JL , Valencia CU , Sword GA . A fungal endophyte defensive symbiosis affects plant-nematode interactions in cotton. Plant Soil. 2018; 422( 1): 251– 66. doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3147-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

135. Bamisile BS , Dash CK , Akutse KS , Keppanan R , Wang L . Fungal endophytes: Beyond herbivore management. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9: 544. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

136. Dash CK , Bamisile BS , Keppanan R , Qasim M , Lin Y , Islam SU , et al. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi enhance the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) and negatively affect the development and reproduction of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Microb Pathog. 2018; 125: 385– 92. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

137. Gatarayiha MC , Laing MD , Miller RM . Effects of crop type on persistence and control efficacy of Beauveria bassiana against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. BioControl. 2010; 55: 719– 30. doi:10.1007/s10526-010-9293-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

138. Miranda-Fuentes A , Rodríguez-Lizana A , Cuenca A , González-Sánchez EJ , Blanco-Roldán GL , Gil-Ribes JA . Improving plant protection product applications in traditional and intensive olive orchards through the development of new prototype air-assisted sprayers. Crop Prot. 2017; 94: 44– 58. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

139. Samal M , Abass S , Parveen R , Ahmad S , Iqbal M . Effect of abiotic stress on production of secondary metabolites in plants. In: Plants as medicine and aromatics. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2023. p. 145– 72. doi:10.1201/9781003226925-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

140. Saedi T , Mosaddeghi MR , Sabzalian MR , Zarebanadkouki M . Effect of Epichloë fungal endophyte symbiosis on tall fescue to cope with flooding-derived oxygen-limited conditions depends on the host genotype. Plant Soil. 2021; 468( 1): 353– 73. doi:10.1007/s11104-021-05105-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

141. Song M , Chai Q , Li X , Yao X , Li C , Christensen MJ , et al. An asexual Epichloë endophyte modifies the nutrient stoichiometry of wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under salt stress. Plant Soil. 2015; 387( 1): 153– 65. doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2289-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

142. Żurek G , Wiewióra B , Rybka K , Prokopiuk K . Different response of perennial ryegrass—Epichloë endophyte symbiota to the elevated concentration of heavy metals in soil. J Appl Genet. 2022; 63( 1): 47– 59. doi:10.1007/s13353-021-00661-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

143. Xu LX , Li XS , Han LB , Li DY , Song GL . Epichloe endophyte infection improved drought and heat tolerance of tall fescue through altered antioxidant enzyme activity. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2017; 82( 2): 90– 7. doi:10.17660/ejhs.2017/82.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

144. Badawy AA , Alotaibi MO , Abdelaziz AM , Osman MS , Khalil AMA , Saleh AM , et al. Enhancement of seawater stress tolerance in barley by the endophytic fungus Aspergillus ochraceus. Metabolites. 2021; 11( 7): 428. doi:10.3390/metabo11070428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

145. Toghueo RMK , Zabalgogeazcoa I , Pereira EC , Vazquez de Aldana BR . A Diaporthe fungal endophyte from a wild grass improves growth and salinity tolerance of Tritordeum and perennial ryegrass. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 896755. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.896755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

146. Sadeghi F , Samsampour D , Askari Seyahooei M , Bagheri A , Soltani J . Fungal endophytes alleviate drought-induced oxidative stress in Mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.): Toward regulating the ascorbate–glutathione cycle. Sci Hortic. 2020; 261: 108991. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

147. Khan AL , Waqas M , Kang SM , Al-Harrasi A , Hussain J , Al-Rawahi A , et al. Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. J Microbiol. 2014; 52( 8): 689– 95. doi:10.1007/s12275-014-4002-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

148. Grabka R , d’Entremont TW , Adams SJ , Walker AK , Tanney JB , Abbasi PA , et al. Fungal endophytes and their role in agricultural plant protection against pests and pathogens. Plants. 2022; 11( 3): 384. doi:10.3390/plants11030384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

149. Gupta S , Schillaci M , Walker R , Smith PMC , Watt M , Roessner U . Alleviation of salinity stress in plants by endophytic plant-fungal symbiosis: Current knowledge, perspectives and future directions. Plant Soil. 2021; 461( 1): 219– 44. doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04618-w. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

150. Venegas-Molina J , Proietti S , Pollier J , Orozco-Freire W , Ramirez-Villacis D , Leon-Reyes A . Induced tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses of broccoli and Arabidopsis after treatment with elicitor molecules. Sci Rep. 2020; 10( 1): 10319. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67074-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

151. Behie SW , Zelisko PM , Bidochka MJ . Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science. 2012; 336( 6088): 1576– 7. doi:10.1126/science.1222289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

152. Dahiya S , Kumar AN , Shanthi Sravan J , Chatterjee S , Sarkar O , Mohan SV . Food waste biorefinery: Sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 248: 2– 12. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

153. Bhardwaj M , Kailoo S , Khan RT , Khan SS , Rasool S . Harnessing fungal endophytes for natural management: A biocontrol perspective. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1280258. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1280258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

154. Sadh PK , Duhan S , Duhan JS . Agro-industrial wastes and their utilization using solid state fermentation: A review. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2018; 5( 1): 1. doi:10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

155. Leong HY , Chang CK , Khoo KS , Chew KW , Chia SR , Lim JW , et al. Waste biorefinery towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy: A solution to global issues. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021; 14( 1): 87. doi:10.1186/s13068-021-01939-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

156. Chitarra W , Pagliarani C , Maserti B , Lumini E , Siciliano I , Cascone P , et al. Insights on the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on tomato tolerance to water stress. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171( 2): 1009– 23. doi:10.1104/pp.16.00307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

157. Volpe V , Chitarra W , Cascone P , Volpe MG , Bartolini P , Moneti G , et al. The association with two different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differently affects water stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 1480. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

158. Misu IJ , Kayess MO , Siddiqui MN , Gupta DR , Islam MN , Islam T . Microbiome engineering for sustainable rice production: Strategies for biofertilization, stress tolerance, and climate resilience. Microorganisms. 2025; 13( 2): 233. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13020233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

159. Sodhi GK , Wijesekara T , Kumawat KC , Adhikari P , Joshi K , Singh S , et al. Nanomaterials-plants-microbes interaction: Plant growth promotion and stress mitigation. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1516794. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1516794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

160. Zaman W , Ayaz A , Park S . Nanomaterials in agriculture: A pathway to enhanced plant growth and abiotic stress resistance. Plants. 2025; 14( 5): 716. doi:10.3390/plants14050716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

161. Balestrini R , Brunetti C , Cammareri M , Caretto S , Cavallaro V , Cominelli E , et al. Strategies to modulate specialized metabolism in Mediterranean crops: From molecular aspects to field. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22( 6): 2887. doi:10.3390/ijms22062887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

162. Marsberg A , Kemler M , Jami F , Nagel JH , Postma-Smidt A , Naidoo S , et al. Botryosphaeria dothidea: A latent pathogen of global importance to woody plant health. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017; 18( 4): 477– 88. doi:10.1111/mpp.12495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

163. Gonthier P , Giordano L , Zampieri E , Lione G , Vizzini A , Colpaert JV , et al. An ectomycorrhizal symbiosis differently affects host susceptibility to two congeneric fungal pathogens. Fungal Ecol. 2019; 39: 250– 6. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2018.12.008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

164. Songy A , Fernandez O , Clément C , Larignon P , Fontaine F . Grapevine trunk diseases under thermal and water stresses. Planta. 2019; 249( 6): 1655– 79. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03111-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

165. Dou T , Zhang K , Shi X , Liu W , Yu F , Liu D . Crop–mushroom rotation: A comprehensive review of its multifaceted impacts on soil quality, agricultural sustainability, and ecosystem health. Agronomy. 2025; 15( 3): 563. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

166. Sarsaiya S , Jain A , Singh R , Gong Q , Wu Q , Chen J , et al. Unveiling the rhizosphere microbiome of Dendrobium: Mechanisms, microbial interactions, and implications for sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol. 2025; 16: 1531900. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1531900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

167. Sun T , Tan W , Yang Y , Mu H . AM fungi and Piriformospora indica improve plant growth of Pinus elliottii Seedlings. Phyton. 2021; 90( 1): 171– 8. doi:10.32604/phyton.2020.013668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

168. Fang L , Xu J , Yang C . Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviates salt-alkali stress demage on Syneilesis aconitifolia. Phyton. 2023; 92( 12): 3195– 209. doi:10.32604/phyton.2023.043049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

169. Benaffari W , Soussani FE , Boutasknit A , Toubali S , Ben Hassine A , Ben Ahmed H , et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve drought tolerance of quinoa grown in compost-amended soils by altering primary and secondary metabolite levels. Phyton. 2024; 93( 9): 2285– 302. doi:10.32604/phyton.2024.055052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

170. Diagne N , Ngom M , Djighaly PI , Fall D , Hocher V , Svistoonoff S . Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and performance: importance in biotic and abiotic stressed regulation. Diversity. 2020; 12( 10): 370. doi:10.3390/d12100370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

171. Liu Y , Fang L , Zhao W , Yang C . Effects of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on physiology of Viola prionantha under salt stress. Phyton. 2023; 92( 1): 55– 69. doi:10.32604/phyton.2022.022159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

172. Boutasknit A , Baslam M , Ait-El-Mokhtar M , Anli M , Ben-Laouane R , Douira A , et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediate drought tolerance and recovery in two contrasting carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) ecotypes by regulating stomatal, water relations, and (in) organic adjustments. Plants. 2020; 9( 1): 80. doi:10.3390/plants9010080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

173. Meng S , Xiong M , Sun Y , Xiong X , Cheng L , Luo C , et al. BdUth1 mediates mitophagy by recruiting BdAtg8 to govern the pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Cell Environ. 2025; 48( 8): 6304– 6. doi:10.1111/pce.15615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

×

Cite This Article

APA Style
Das, K., Sarker, A., Deepo, D.M., Aminuzzaman, F.M., Siddique, A.B. et al. (2026). Fungi for Future Farming: Enhancing Nutrient Uptake and Stress Resilience in Sustainable Development Era. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 95(7), 3. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.079822
Vancouver Style
Das K, Sarker A, Deepo DM, Aminuzzaman FM, Siddique AB, Nasif SO, et al. Fungi for Future Farming: Enhancing Nutrient Uptake and Stress Resilience in Sustainable Development Era. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 2026;95(7):3. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.079822
IEEE Style
K. Das et al., “Fungi for Future Farming: Enhancing Nutrient Uptake and Stress Resilience in Sustainable Development Era,” Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot., vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.079822


cc Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 336

    View

  • 112

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link